Klasik616
π½π‘πππ π₯ππ‘π‘ππ π©π€ π©ππ ππ€π§π
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2024
- Posts
- 14,303
- Reputation
- 26,619
VS
Pick one
Serious
@thecel @FUE Mogger
@Pei
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ramus definitely dictate your gonial angle right?high gonial angle incel
vs
low gonial angle boyfriend
The difference is just boneshigh gonial angle incel
vs
low gonial angle boyfriend
Gonial angle stayed the same, all you did was increase his forward growthhigh gonial angle incel
vs
low gonial angle boyfriend
What about the presence of an antegonial notch, when the ramus extends over the mandible's angle?most people look better with higher gonial angles they end up with short chins and heads if it's too low, because the ramus isn't tall enough to accommodate it.
that being said here's what it actually looks like when you have a low-ish angle, the angle of your mental protuberance is usually determined by the angle of your mandible so when it's low it points straight forward, mine reaches almost to the tip of my nose.
View attachment 3173109
this is to say that your morph isn't actually accurate, because it retains the same angle of the mental protuberance as the before, if he actually had a low angle his chin would be shorter.
that can affect the angle of the protuberance hence why I said the angle of the mandible and not the gonion.What about the presence of an antegonial notch, when the ramus extends over the mandible's angle?
That's not even the GA. You increased his sagittal growth and made his ramus taller.high gonial angle incel
vs
low gonial angle boyfriend
So in a hypothetical case where the ramus is the same height but one mandible has a chin/mental protuberance pointing downwards, giving it a notch.that can affect the angle of the protuberance hence why I said the angle of the mandible and not the gonion.
but people with higher gonial angles probably also have more sloping past the ramus if they have a notch.
evolutionarily speaking lower is better due to the hinge function of the mandible, the higher it is the weaker your bite force, but I don't think sloping past the gonion affects this much.
So in a hypothetical case where the ramus is the same height but one mandible has a chin/mental protuberance pointing downwards, giving it a notch.
And the other just being a right angle mandible with no other sloping or curves.
They'll both have equal bite force?
The former is surely more aesthetic while the latter can be considered more evolutionary correct or whatever, but the jaw's function is still carried out in the same way. Isn't it?
Get some neuronsThat's not even the GA. You increased his sagittal growth and made his ramus taller.
Brutal. High will always be better. It avoids having a giga square face.Another gonial angle cel:
View attachment 3249889