Zenis
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2023
- Posts
- 12,834
- Reputation
- 17,428
Jfl at retarded niggas thinking, im high iq brooo i will manipulate you probably cant even talk to local salaryman without thinking about it thrice
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
over for highiq copers of this forumJfl at retarded niggas thinking, im high iq brooo i will manipulate you probably cant even talk to local salaryman without thinking about it thrice
No it isn't.IQ is a bad way of measuring intelligence.
Emotional intelligenceHere we go again...
I'm waiting for someone to properly define EQ then we can start talking about it.
Iq to be considered retarded is below 70, average IQ in US and Europe was around 70 a hundred years ago as shown by flynn effect.No it isn't.
Yes, and what would that be?Emotional intelligence
1. Impossible to accurately get these stats. Flynn effect is BS, it's just stats from 1934 to 1978 in the US. You can't measure 1920s average iqIq to be considered retarded is below 70, average IQ in US and Europe was around 70 a hundred years ago as shown by flynn effect.
It's obviously a shit measurement
ability to understand and control your own feelings, while also being good at understanding how others feel and responding to them.Yes, and what would that be?
IQ is a measurement for education level and not your natural intelligence, your second point literally admits this.1. Impossible to accurately get these stats. Flynn effect is BS, it's just stats from 1934 to 1978 in the US. You can't measure 1920s average iq
2. Even if it was. It was heavily dragged down by uneducated religious people, who weren't the brightest(JFL at trying to say they weren't retards)
Intelligent people are better at this.ability to understand and control your own feelings, while also being good at understanding how others feel and responding to them.
You need to prove it's not bullshit, not the other way. It legit has no proof other than "Iq increased from x year to y year"IQ is a measurement for education level and not your natural intelligence, your second point literally admits this.
also you'll need to provide proof that it's bullshit.
IQ is a utter dogshit metric that can't measure general intelligence.
also jfl at the 'nah bro it was only 90 years ago', that's even fucking worse for IQ being a valid metric dude.
Do you know how IQ is calculated? It starts off as a raw number and is turned into 100, you can simply compare the average raw number fifty years ago to one now, they're different. What you're asking for is fucking retarded and shows you don't know what IQ is.You need to prove it's not bullshit, not the other way. It legit has no proof other than "Iq increased from x year to y year"
Iq measures your ability to learn and recognize patterns. Obviously it is correlated with education. The more you learn, the easier it gets
Same thing with 90 years ago and now. Looking at the amounts of stuff people learn now and what they were learning then - it is a clear case for today's people superiority. We simply can learn more complex things and in bigger amounts
He is coping cause he got an iq score of 120 in muh mensa onlineDo you know how IQ is calculated? It starts off as a raw number and is turned into 100, you can simply compare the average raw number fifty years ago to one now, they're different. What you're asking for is fucking retarded and shows you don't know what IQ is.
Again you're admitting IQ is just a measurement for education, It says very little about your natural mental abilities.
Caged at thisView attachment 3162803
if you ain't chill as him, don't expect anything less.