hinduism is the greatest religion, tbh

Aiwass

Aiwass

Temp. Banned
Joined
Jan 6, 2026
Posts
1,316
Reputation
1,216
best philosophy
best art
best beliefs

its beautiful
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: LTNUser, sayonara, mitsuki6643 and 8 others
hinduism is a nigger jew religion
blue nigga brahmin god saar :soy:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, Chromosome-X, kevbsa and 2 others
its Christianity ofc

objectively
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, Chromosome-X, Centurion_Hunter and 5 others
hinduism is a nigger jew religion
blue nigga brahmin god saar :soy:
u know nothing about hinduism

"nigger jew" religion? wow, u are retarded
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LTNUser and Chromosome-X
u know nothing about hinduism

"nigger jew" religion? wow, u are retarded
make sure you dont get ran over by a train baljeet :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: callard
fucking love u.

yk ball

even tho im not a hindu my family is and it really is cool along with buddhism
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and Eidolon
jokes asides I think Christianity is the most affluent religion and definitely most impactful.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Nerd
Reactions: LTNUser, currycelll, callard and 3 others
im tryna see something, why don't you rank all religions on a list, no need to give any reason
 
Hinduism is just a butchered up version of Zoroastrianism.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Swarthy Knight and ecstazy
hinduism is a nigger jew religion
blue nigga brahmin god saar :soy:
nigga it was there before jew niggers
It is the Vedic religion, which came from the aryan invasion and shit
oldest religion for some reason
best philosophy
best art
best beliefs

its beautiful
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eidolon
Hinduism is just a butchered up version of Zoroastrianism.
it was there before Persian Ahura mazda shit
but purely based on history

wouldn't it be Christianity?
Christianity sucks cause it lacks philosophical depth compared to Eastern religions
Buddhism is far better than Jesus
Meditation Buddhism GIF
shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eidolon and Swarthy Knight
Agnostism
 
  • Love it
Reactions: gintoki sataka
it was there before Persian Ahura mazda shit

Christianity sucks cause it lacks philosophical depth compared to Eastern religions
Buddhism is far better than Jesus
Meditation Buddhism GIF
shit

Yes. Buddha alone mogs all Abrahamic desert faiths
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: grav, Eidolon and gintoki sataka
why would u base it purely off history?
That's a completely materialistic way of judging a religion. Nothing spirtual about it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aiwass
has to be satire
 
  • +1
Reactions: callard
You're confusing Judaism with Hinduism. Hinduism is way older than Zoroastrianism
Maybe, but didn’t Zoroastrianism have cow worship as well?
 
it was there before Persian Ahura mazda shit

Christianity sucks cause it lacks philosophical depth compared to Eastern religions
Buddhism is far better than Jesus
Meditation Buddhism GIF
shit
Christianity is the most theologically depth RELGION wtf are you on about. you don’t have to like it and that’s fine but to blatantly lie about it when the religion has the most philosophy attributed to it of any your faith is ludicrous.

I mean wtf do you retards think the trinity is ? That alone is more philosophically dense than anything in eastern faiths and bear in mind eastern Christianity (Orginal Christianity still practiced today by hundreds of millions) is very different to the sanitised western branches so your wrong on so many levels just don’t speak brah

Buddah isn’t better then Jesus that’s cope

I get it’s popular and a trend to attack Christianity we are used to it and have a thick skin about it and don’t GAF but this is pure lunacy on your end. If you prefer Hinduism or Buddhism jsut say that nobody will argue with you on this because honestly nobody cares about the opinions of heathens and Pagans even me a religious dude took 0 offence to this post. but don’t make up bullshit
 
Last edited:
best philosophy
best art
best beliefs

its beautiful
Elaborate and Justify.
The description given by you is vague and other religions repeat the same thing. Would help me know more
 
catholicism is the most blackpilled "religion" (hate saying religion when it should be considered the truth)

the true philosophy
the most honest and aesthetic art
the most loyal people you will meet
the best scientists
the best athletes
etc.
 
catholicism is the most blackpilled "religion" (hate saying religion when it should be considered the truth)

the true philosophy
the most honest and aesthetic art
the most loyal people you will meet
the best scientists
the best athletes
etc.
Many prominent physicists, including Erwin Schrödinger, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, were deeply influenced by the Upanishads due to striking conceptual parallels between ancient Indian philosophy and modern quantum physics.

Erwin Schrödinger explicitly stated that the Upanishadic idea of Atman = Brahman (the self is one with universal consciousness) helped him make sense of quantum theory.
He noted that consciousness is a singularity, not plural, and that the observer and observed are fundamentally connected—mirroring quantum principles like superposition and the observer effect.

Niels Bohr, a pioneer of quantum mechanics, famously said, “I go into the Upanishads to ask questions,” reflecting his belief that the Upanishads offered profound insights into the nature of reality, complementing his scientific work.

The Upanishads’ emphasis on non-duality, interconnectedness, and consciousness as foundational to reality resonates with key quantum concepts such as entanglement, wave-particle duality, and the role of observation in shaping reality.
Physicists found in these ancient texts not just philosophical comfort, but intellectual alignment with their discoverie:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: oxyyy
Christianity is the most theologically depth RELGION wtf are you on about. you don’t have to like it and that’s fine but to blatantly lie about it when the religion has the most philosophy attributed to it of any your faith is ludicrous.

I mean wtf do you retards think the trinity is ? That alone is more philosophically dense than anything in eastern faiths and bear in mind eastern Christianity (Orginal Christianity still practiced today by hundreds of millions) is very different to the sanitised western branches so your wrong on so many levels just don’t speak brah

Buddah isn’t better then Jesus that’s cope

I get it’s popular and a trend to attack Christianity we are used to it and have a thick skin about it and don’t GAF but this is pure lunacy on your end. If you prefer Hinduism or Buddhism jsut say that nobody will argue with you on this because honestly nobody cares about the opinions of heathens and Pagans even me a religious dude took 0 offence to this post. but don’t make up bullshit
### Introduction: Defining Philosophical Depth in Religious Contexts

Philosophical depth in a religion can be assessed by examining the complexity, diversity, and sophistication of its metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, and soteriological frameworks. It involves how a tradition grapples with fundamental questions about reality, knowledge, morality, and ultimate liberation or salvation. Sanatan Dharma, often referred to as Hinduism, is an ancient, pluralistic tradition rooted in the Vedas, Upanishads, and various darshanas (philosophical schools). Christianity, emerging from Jewish roots in the 1st century CE, centers on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ as revealed in the Bible.

This analysis compares the two, arguing that Sanatan Dharma exhibits greater philosophical depth due to its broader scope, tolerance for paradox, and integration of diverse schools of thought that encourage ongoing inquiry rather than dogmatic closure. While Christianity offers profound insights into personal redemption and moral absolutism, its reliance on revelation over rational exploration limits its philosophical breadth compared to Hinduism's expansive, experiential approaches. The following sections explore key areas, drawing on historical, textual, and comparative sources to substantiate this view. This "twenty-page" explanation is structured thematically for clarity, equivalent to an extended essay.

### Section 1: Historical and Foundational Origins

Sanatan Dharma, meaning "eternal order" or "eternal way," traces its roots to the Indus Valley Civilization (circa 3000 BCE) and the Vedic texts (1500–500 BCE), making it one of the world's oldest continuous traditions. Its philosophical core developed through the Upanishads, which pose profound questions like "Who am I?" and "What is the nature of reality?" without a single founder or centralized authority. This lack of dogmatism allows for evolution, incorporating influences from Buddhism, Jainism, and regional practices, resulting in a "compilation of many traditions and philosophies."

Christianity, founded on the teachings of Jesus Christ (circa 4 BCE–30 CE), builds on Jewish monotheism and was formalized through councils like Nicaea (325 CE). Its philosophy draws from Greek thinkers (e.g., Plato via Augustine) but prioritizes divine revelation in scripture over speculative inquiry. While thinkers like Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotelian logic into theology, Christianity's emphasis on faith as the primary path to truth contrasts with Hinduism's rational and meditative explorations. Hinduism's antiquity and adaptability provide deeper layers of historical philosophical accretion, fostering schools like Nyaya (logic) and Mimamsa (ritual hermeneutics) that predate Western philosophy.

### Section 2: Metaphysics – Concepts of Ultimate Reality

Hinduism's metaphysics is extraordinarily rich, centered on Brahman as the impersonal, all-encompassing Absolute Reality that transcends yet pervades the universe (panentheism). The Atman-Brahman identity ("Tat Tvam Asi" – Thou art That) from the Upanishads posits that individual souls are not separate from the divine but illusions (maya) to be transcended through realization. This monism, especially in Advaita Vedanta (non-dualism) by Adi Shankara (8th century CE), integrates polytheism (330 million deities as manifestations) with monotheism, allowing for henotheism where one deity is supreme while acknowledging others.

Diverse schools add depth: Samkhya's dualism of Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter), Vaisheshika's atomism, and Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism) by Ramanuja, which posits a personal God with attributes. This pluralism embraces paradox – reality as both personal and impersonal, finite and infinite – encouraging intellectual flexibility.

Christianity's metaphysics is monotheistic, with God as a personal, triune being (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) distinct from creation. The doctrine of creation ex nihilo (from nothing) emphasizes God's transcendence and immanence through the Incarnation. However, it rejects pantheism or monism, viewing the world as real but fallen. Philosophical depth here lies in theodicy (e.g., Augustine's free will defense for evil) and scholasticism, but it lacks Hinduism's multiplicity of ontological frameworks. Hinduism's ability to hold contradictory views (e.g., theistic and atheistic schools like Samkhya) demonstrates greater metaphysical sophistication.

| Aspect | Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) | Christianity |
|--------|---------------------------|-------------|
| Ultimate Reality | Brahman: Impersonal, panentheistic, with personal manifestations; multiple interpretations (monism, dualism). | God: Personal, triune, transcendent creator; singular interpretation. |
| Worldview | Cyclical cosmos, maya (illusion), Atman-Brahman unity. | Linear history, real but fallen creation, separation from God. |
| Depth Indicator | Plural schools allow paradox and evolution. | Unified dogma emphasizes revelation over speculation. |

### Section 3: Epistemology – Paths to Knowledge

Hinduism recognizes multiple pramanas (means of knowledge): perception, inference, testimony, analogy, postulation, and non-perception. The Nyaya school develops formal logic akin to Aristotle's syllogisms but with five-membered arguments, while Vedanta prioritizes shruti (revealed texts) and anubhava (personal experience) through meditation. Knowledge is soteriological – jnana (wisdom) leads to moksha (liberation) – and inclusive, validating intuition and mysticism alongside reason.

Christianity's epistemology centers on faith and revelation (sola scriptura in Protestantism), with reason as a handmaid (fides et ratio). Apologetics (e.g., Anselm's ontological argument) uses philosophy to defend faith, but ultimate truth is inaccessible without divine grace. This fideism limits depth compared to Hinduism's rational pluralism, where even atheism (Charvaka) is debated within the tradition.

### Section 4: Ethics – Moral Frameworks

Dharma (righteous duty) in Hinduism is contextual, varying by varna (class), ashrama (life stage), and karma. The Bhagavad Gita integrates karma yoga (action), bhakti (devotion), and jnana (knowledge) as paths, emphasizing ahimsa (non-violence) and detachment. Ethical depth arises from karma's law of cause-effect, promoting individual accountability over collective punishment.

Christian ethics derive from divine commands (Ten Commandments), agape love, and original sin's redemption through Christ. Virtue ethics (via Aquinas) add nuance, but the focus on grace over works contrasts with Hinduism's self-purification. Hinduism's relativistic dharma allows deeper exploration of moral ambiguity, though criticized for justifying caste.

| Ethical Principle | Sanatan Dharma | Christianity |
|-------------------|---------------|-------------|
| Core Concept | Dharma: Contextual duty, karma-driven. | Love: Agape, sin-redemption. |
| Accountability | Individual rebirth cycles. | Collective original sin, personal faith. |
| Depth | Flexible, integrates multiple yogas. | Absolute, revelation-based. |

### Section 5: Soteriology – Liberation and Salvation

Moksha in Hinduism is liberation from samsara (rebirth cycle) via self-realization, achievable through multiple margas (paths). Concepts like yajna (sacrifice) as creative and eternal parallel yet differ from Christian redemption. This pluralism – from Advaita's non-dual union to Dvaita theism – offers profound existential flexibility.

Christian salvation is through faith in Christ's atoning sacrifice, leading to eternal life or damnation. While deep in addressing human fallenness, it is singular, rejecting reincarnation. Hinduism's cyclical view and emphasis on personal effort provide more philosophical layers for contemplating existence.

### Section 6: Theological Dialogue and Similarities

Both share self-sacrificial divinity: Vedic Purusha vs. Christ's Eucharist. Trinity parallels Trimurti (Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva). However, Hinduism's non-exclusivity ("all paths valid") fosters deeper interfaith engagement.

### Section 7: Critiques and Counterarguments

Critics argue Christianity's uniformity provides clearer truth claims. Hinduism's diversity can seem fragmented, but this enables profound inquiry. Social issues like caste are ethical flaws, yet Christianity has historical injustices (e.g., slavery justification).

### Section 8: Influence on Global Philosophy

Hinduism influenced Western thinkers (Schopenhauer, Emerson) via its depth in consciousness studies. Christianity shaped ethics and law, but Hinduism's meditative practices offer deeper psychological insights.

### Section 9: Modern Relevance and Pluralism

In a globalized world, Hinduism's tolerance aligns with postmodern pluralism, providing tools for existential depth amid uncertainty.

### Section 10: Conclusion – Why Sanatan Dharma Holds More Depth

Sanatan Dharma's philosophical depth surpasses Christianity's due to its ancient, multifaceted systems that embrace ambiguity, reason, and experience without dogmatic constraints. While Christianity excels in personal relational theology, Hinduism's breadth – from logic to mysticism – invites endless exploration, making it the more profound tradition for philosophical inquiry. This is not to diminish Christianity but to highlight Hinduism's unique contributions to human thought.

well grok ai said this
But tbh I have known interest in philosophy,y and I will accept that Christianity is good compared to other Abrahamic religions, but at philosopical level eastern religions are better
 
### Introduction: Defining Philosophical Depth in Religious Contexts

Philosophical depth in a religion can be assessed by examining the complexity, diversity, and sophistication of its metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, and soteriological frameworks. It involves how a tradition grapples with fundamental questions about reality, knowledge, morality, and ultimate liberation or salvation. Sanatan Dharma, often referred to as Hinduism, is an ancient, pluralistic tradition rooted in the Vedas, Upanishads, and various darshanas (philosophical schools). Christianity, emerging from Jewish roots in the 1st century CE, centers on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ as revealed in the Bible.

This analysis compares the two, arguing that Sanatan Dharma exhibits greater philosophical depth due to its broader scope, tolerance for paradox, and integration of diverse schools of thought that encourage ongoing inquiry rather than dogmatic closure. While Christianity offers profound insights into personal redemption and moral absolutism, its reliance on revelation over rational exploration limits its philosophical breadth compared to Hinduism's expansive, experiential approaches. The following sections explore key areas, drawing on historical, textual, and comparative sources to substantiate this view. This "twenty-page" explanation is structured thematically for clarity, equivalent to an extended essay.

### Section 1: Historical and Foundational Origins

Sanatan Dharma, meaning "eternal order" or "eternal way," traces its roots to the Indus Valley Civilization (circa 3000 BCE) and the Vedic texts (1500–500 BCE), making it one of the world's oldest continuous traditions. Its philosophical core developed through the Upanishads, which pose profound questions like "Who am I?" and "What is the nature of reality?" without a single founder or centralized authority. This lack of dogmatism allows for evolution, incorporating influences from Buddhism, Jainism, and regional practices, resulting in a "compilation of many traditions and philosophies."

Christianity, founded on the teachings of Jesus Christ (circa 4 BCE–30 CE), builds on Jewish monotheism and was formalized through councils like Nicaea (325 CE). Its philosophy draws from Greek thinkers (e.g., Plato via Augustine) but prioritizes divine revelation in scripture over speculative inquiry. While thinkers like Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotelian logic into theology, Christianity's emphasis on faith as the primary path to truth contrasts with Hinduism's rational and meditative explorations. Hinduism's antiquity and adaptability provide deeper layers of historical philosophical accretion, fostering schools like Nyaya (logic) and Mimamsa (ritual hermeneutics) that predate Western philosophy.

### Section 2: Metaphysics – Concepts of Ultimate Reality

Hinduism's metaphysics is extraordinarily rich, centered on Brahman as the impersonal, all-encompassing Absolute Reality that transcends yet pervades the universe (panentheism). The Atman-Brahman identity ("Tat Tvam Asi" – Thou art That) from the Upanishads posits that individual souls are not separate from the divine but illusions (maya) to be transcended through realization. This monism, especially in Advaita Vedanta (non-dualism) by Adi Shankara (8th century CE), integrates polytheism (330 million deities as manifestations) with monotheism, allowing for henotheism where one deity is supreme while acknowledging others.

Diverse schools add depth: Samkhya's dualism of Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter), Vaisheshika's atomism, and Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism) by Ramanuja, which posits a personal God with attributes. This pluralism embraces paradox – reality as both personal and impersonal, finite and infinite – encouraging intellectual flexibility.

Christianity's metaphysics is monotheistic, with God as a personal, triune being (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) distinct from creation. The doctrine of creation ex nihilo (from nothing) emphasizes God's transcendence and immanence through the Incarnation. However, it rejects pantheism or monism, viewing the world as real but fallen. Philosophical depth here lies in theodicy (e.g., Augustine's free will defense for evil) and scholasticism, but it lacks Hinduism's multiplicity of ontological frameworks. Hinduism's ability to hold contradictory views (e.g., theistic and atheistic schools like Samkhya) demonstrates greater metaphysical sophistication.

| Aspect | Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) | Christianity |
|--------|---------------------------|-------------|
| Ultimate Reality | Brahman: Impersonal, panentheistic, with personal manifestations; multiple interpretations (monism, dualism). | God: Personal, triune, transcendent creator; singular interpretation. |
| Worldview | Cyclical cosmos, maya (illusion), Atman-Brahman unity. | Linear history, real but fallen creation, separation from God. |
| Depth Indicator | Plural schools allow paradox and evolution. | Unified dogma emphasizes revelation over speculation. |

### Section 3: Epistemology – Paths to Knowledge

Hinduism recognizes multiple pramanas (means of knowledge): perception, inference, testimony, analogy, postulation, and non-perception. The Nyaya school develops formal logic akin to Aristotle's syllogisms but with five-membered arguments, while Vedanta prioritizes shruti (revealed texts) and anubhava (personal experience) through meditation. Knowledge is soteriological – jnana (wisdom) leads to moksha (liberation) – and inclusive, validating intuition and mysticism alongside reason.

Christianity's epistemology centers on faith and revelation (sola scriptura in Protestantism), with reason as a handmaid (fides et ratio). Apologetics (e.g., Anselm's ontological argument) uses philosophy to defend faith, but ultimate truth is inaccessible without divine grace. This fideism limits depth compared to Hinduism's rational pluralism, where even atheism (Charvaka) is debated within the tradition.

### Section 4: Ethics – Moral Frameworks

Dharma (righteous duty) in Hinduism is contextual, varying by varna (class), ashrama (life stage), and karma. The Bhagavad Gita integrates karma yoga (action), bhakti (devotion), and jnana (knowledge) as paths, emphasizing ahimsa (non-violence) and detachment. Ethical depth arises from karma's law of cause-effect, promoting individual accountability over collective punishment.

Christian ethics derive from divine commands (Ten Commandments), agape love, and original sin's redemption through Christ. Virtue ethics (via Aquinas) add nuance, but the focus on grace over works contrasts with Hinduism's self-purification. Hinduism's relativistic dharma allows deeper exploration of moral ambiguity, though criticized for justifying caste.

| Ethical Principle | Sanatan Dharma | Christianity |
|-------------------|---------------|-------------|
| Core Concept | Dharma: Contextual duty, karma-driven. | Love: Agape, sin-redemption. |
| Accountability | Individual rebirth cycles. | Collective original sin, personal faith. |
| Depth | Flexible, integrates multiple yogas. | Absolute, revelation-based. |

### Section 5: Soteriology – Liberation and Salvation

Moksha in Hinduism is liberation from samsara (rebirth cycle) via self-realization, achievable through multiple margas (paths). Concepts like yajna (sacrifice) as creative and eternal parallel yet differ from Christian redemption. This pluralism – from Advaita's non-dual union to Dvaita theism – offers profound existential flexibility.

Christian salvation is through faith in Christ's atoning sacrifice, leading to eternal life or damnation. While deep in addressing human fallenness, it is singular, rejecting reincarnation. Hinduism's cyclical view and emphasis on personal effort provide more philosophical layers for contemplating existence.

### Section 6: Theological Dialogue and Similarities

Both share self-sacrificial divinity: Vedic Purusha vs. Christ's Eucharist. Trinity parallels Trimurti (Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva). However, Hinduism's non-exclusivity ("all paths valid") fosters deeper interfaith engagement.

### Section 7: Critiques and Counterarguments

Critics argue Christianity's uniformity provides clearer truth claims. Hinduism's diversity can seem fragmented, but this enables profound inquiry. Social issues like caste are ethical flaws, yet Christianity has historical injustices (e.g., slavery justification).

### Section 8: Influence on Global Philosophy

Hinduism influenced Western thinkers (Schopenhauer, Emerson) via its depth in consciousness studies. Christianity shaped ethics and law, but Hinduism's meditative practices offer deeper psychological insights.

### Section 9: Modern Relevance and Pluralism

In a globalized world, Hinduism's tolerance aligns with postmodern pluralism, providing tools for existential depth amid uncertainty.

### Section 10: Conclusion – Why Sanatan Dharma Holds More Depth

Sanatan Dharma's philosophical depth surpasses Christianity's due to its ancient, multifaceted systems that embrace ambiguity, reason, and experience without dogmatic constraints. While Christianity excels in personal relational theology, Hinduism's breadth – from logic to mysticism – invites endless exploration, making it the more profound tradition for philosophical inquiry. This is not to diminish Christianity but to highlight Hinduism's unique contributions to human thought.

well grok ai said this
But tbh I have known interest in philosophy,y and I will accept that Christianity is good compared to other Abrahamic religions, but at philosopical level eastern religions are better
Christianity is eastern and eastern religions outeide of Christianity are philosophically bankrupt
Both Hinduism and Buddhism have no account for morality they can’t even agree upon knowledge claims when pressed they just say “contradictions are a part of life and that’s how it should be :feelsuhh:“ how can a RELGION that allows for contradictions in terms of transcendentals be remotely “Sensible” I’ve even debated the eastern religions here and they have no response

Watch Jay dyer an actual Philopher debate and retort the gunmetal ground Buddhism stands upon. Christianity is literally the only philosophically sound belief system that doesn’t contradict and fall into absurdities.



Actually watch these and see him debate the eastern beliefs on their metaphysical and philosophical claims and watch how easy it is to show how redundant and retarded eastern faiths are
 
Last edited:
allat only to be reincarnated as a dalit :feelswhy:
 
Tis the truth BHAIIII jaaaniiii

She also used one off her hands to finger my anus and Jack me off whist slaying

4 arm hoes FTW and you know I love Jeeta hoes

Luckily (for you) she's not part of my religion. I got a bunch of blasphemous Christcuck posts in the locker that'd make you wanna go ER :feelshaha:
 
📍
 

Attachments

  • imagem_2026-01-14_193549237.png
    imagem_2026-01-14_193549237.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 0

Similar threads

1966Ford
Replies
1
Views
137
Survived abortion
Survived abortion
swaggers
Replies
66
Views
317
Ju-on / 呪怨
Ju-on / 呪怨
N
Replies
11
Views
87
Eidolon
Eidolon
PrinceLuenLeoncur
Replies
34
Views
201
Adonis123
Adonis123
neurodivergent
Replies
3
Views
90
Eidolon
Eidolon

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top