Horse faced normie to chadlite.

slime

slime

Just another man.
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Posts
2,630
Reputation
4,635
1587666901287
1587666906676
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Hades, Deleted member 5891, MusicMaxxingMidget and 2 others
That's too compact. You look like a 5 year old there
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 4804, Deleted member 2205, Somalipirate and 2 others
*Chadelite to Chad
 
Looks good but my midface looks longer because of lens distortion
8D93474B 737D 4A9A B7CA 14ECF92F608C

you should morph this one instead.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 5385 and Deleted member 3043
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5891
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4804, LordNorwood, Deleted member 5632 and 1 other person
I think @Jagged0 measured it somewhere around 0.70
are you thinking of midface ratio? Or did u mean 1.7. Ideal FWHR is 1.8 - 2.0
 
are you thinking of midface ratio? Or did u mean 1.7. Ideal FWHR is 1.8 - 2.0
Yes my fhwr is that low bro. My midface ratio is 0.88.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4804 and Deleted member 6129
Aren't you blackpilled? why are you getting angry at me for telling you the harsh truth.
You are a bad troll JFL. I don’t even feel like arguing with you because your trolling is so low effort. Maybe learn from @DaddyBigPenis
It can't be 0.7
Calculate it yourself. I’m sure that my midface ratio is 0.88 and my fhwr is 1.7 maybe even less cause i’m kinda being generous here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043, Deleted member 685 and Deleted member 2661
@Greeicy we should create a long midface gang.
 
@Greeicy we should create a long midface gang.
I legit don’t even care. Users here told me I would look good with a beard since It frauds my midface and face width. If you actually believe attractiveness is determined by midface ratio alone then I have some bad news for you
94E7D17B 47B4 41D0 83C7 10283AD6B721

1FBEBF9E 3247 4E4F A421 B999EF22D027

But I guess it’s over because my midface ratio is below 1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685 and Incoming
I legit don’t even care. Users here told me I would look good with a beard since It frauds my midface and face width. If you actually believe attractiveness is determined by midface ratio alone then I have some bad news for you
View attachment 371071
View attachment 371074
But I guess it’s over because my midface ratio is below 1
Ah you were saying 0.7 not 1.7. 1.7 is not that bad tbh, considering 1.8 is in ideal range. Honestly though it might be lower, I got 1.67 from that photo and your head was tilted upward slightly. But u look decent imo. Good beard. My fwhr is low as well

Screen Shot 2020 04 24 at 43251 AM
 
Last edited:
Ah you were saying 0.7 not 1.7. 1.7 is not that bad tbh, considering 1.8 is in ideal range. Honestly though it might be lower, I got 1.67 from that photo and your head was tilted upward slightly. But u look decent imo. Good beard.

View attachment 371193
My head is not tilted upwards in this pic. 1.67? That’s so much lower than I thought.
 
@medialcanthuscel
 
His face needs to be wider, not shorter.

You pillocks don't get it.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: medialcanthuscel and Deleted member 685
His face needs to be wider, not shorter.

You pillocks don't get it.
Why? The absolute size doesn't matter unless you want a bigger head, it's the ratios that are important. In his case the midface ratio is low as well as FWHR, so shortening the midface brings both of them to a better value. If you just made the zygos wider without changing IPD (as with MSE) then the midface ratio is still too low.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 685
Why? The absolute size doesn't matter unless you want a bigger head
Of course it matters, it's a dimorphic trait.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685

Similar threads

L
Replies
3
Views
59
piec
P
hybobu
Replies
0
Views
79
hybobu
hybobu
cromagnon
Replies
36
Views
408
Phantomivy
Phantomivy
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
4
Views
72
CopiumX
CopiumX

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top