D
Deleted member 4362
⠀ ⠀
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2019
- Posts
- 31,021
- Reputation
- 36,232
They should forever be in your debt, especially given they did not attempt corrective procedures
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They should have taken the necessary steps to ensure a goodlooking child. They failed me as a sonShouldn't be mad at em, they were bluepilled + they would've chosen you to have chad genes if they could
Exactly it’s their duty to pay for surgery, not make their subhuman suffer throughout their most fertile years, what kind of parent doesn’t want their child to pass on their genes.I strength mog my dad so ive been fighting him a lot recently. He’s gonna be Payin for this Fkin bimax.
I am.i think you should be more mad at the fact your parents decided to raise you in the west as an ethnic
you were most likely destined to live a happy normie life in your home country
But a kid which isn’t getting female attention should be addressed early not gaslighted into studying or other useless copeseugenics isn't real, even if your parents are attractive you can still end up as ugly, even if your parents are ugly you can end up attractive.
One time my dad told me “You’re not entitled to sex”I strength mog my dad so ive been fighting him a lot recently. He’s gonna be Payin for this Fkin bimax.
this is false tbheugenics isn't real, even if your parents are attractive you can still end up as ugly, even if your parents are ugly you can end up attractive.
individual dogs of a breed are still ugly if there wasn't any variance you wouldn't even recognize your own specific dog, and all breed dogs are plagued by breed specific diseases.this is false tbh
otherwise dog breeding wouldn't exist or even evolution for that matter
you can effectively eliminate traits/genes from the genetic pool by culling the undesirables
most men historically don't reproduce.But a kid which isn’t getting female attention should be addressed early not gaslighted into studying or other useless copes
Yh cos dogshit parent jflindividual dogs of a breed are still ugly if there wasn't any variance you wouldn't even recognize your own specific dog, and all breed dogs are plagued by breed specific diseases.
most men historically don't reproduce.
first of all dogs aren't supposed to be attractiveindividual dogs of a breed are still ugly if there wasn't any variance you wouldn't even recognize your own specific dog, and all breed dogs are plagued by breed specific diseases.
it's been this way since antiquity, even when humans had to be good parents or else their offspring died, even when we were living in small tribal communities where women didn't have that much to choose from.Yh cos dogshit parent jfl![]()
many breeds are specifically cosmetic and serve no other purpose, the variance within breeds is enough for you to be able to recognize individuals, which also means that variance is large enough to produce ugly individuals.first of all dogs aren't supposed to be attractive
and i never said there wasn't any variance within separate dog breeds
all dogs, that being chihuahuas, pit bulls, german shepherds etc essentially descend from one type of wolf, the grey wolf
meaning via eugenics humans have manipulated and isolated the ideal traits they desired and created their own classes of grey wolf
the specific diseases are due to a small gene pool and inbreeding which can easily be avoided
it utterly depends on how heritable attractiveness and bones aremany breeds are specifically cosmetic and serve no other purpose, the variance within breeds is enough for you to be able to recognize individuals, which also means that variance is large enough to produce ugly individuals.
if you bred humans to be attractive, you'd still end up with genetic recombination that produces ugly individuals, not to mention that it wouldn't work very well because it takes about 3 decades to produce a single generation of humans, the project would outlive the beauty standards that were present when it began.
women are the biggest eugenicists on the face of the planet already and yet there's still ugly, low functioning, poor people, and selection criteria set for your program would still be milder than the requirements modern women already have to begin with.it utterly depends on how heritable attractiveness and bones are
if attractiveness/bone structure has a heritability rate of higher than lets say 0.5 then theoretically a looks eugenics program should work
like everything else in life, genetic inheritance really isn't that random and is actually rather predictable even for traits that are highly polygenic
smart parents have smart children, tall parents have tall children, athletic parents have athletic children etc etc
evolution is eugenics just on a larger scale
That doesn't mean eugenics aren't realeugenics isn't real, even if your parents are attractive you can still end up as ugly, even if your parents are ugly you can end up attractive.
thing is a eugenics program would involve males and females as neither would be making the final decision, therefore it would be a million times more effective than a 4/10 ltb getting pumped and dumped by a tyronewomen are the biggest eugenicists on the face of the planet already and yet there's still ugly, low functioning, poor people, and selection criteria set for your program would still be milder than the requirements modern women already have to begin with.
bone structure depends a lot on your environment you grow up with, modern humans have poor jaws and not enough space for their teeth because they don't chew enough through their early life, not because they lost the genes for it.
Lol @ thinking elites would reduce the global pop. though, the future will be even more subhumansthing is a eugenics program would involve males and females as neither would be making the final decision, therefore it would be a million times more effective than a 4/10 ltb getting pumped and dumped by a tyrone
the main reason male incels exist even to this day and age is because ugly, boneless people are allowed to reproduce (mainly ugly and boneless women as theyre the modern day selectors)
attractiveness has a heritability rate of 0.5-0.7 meaning ugly people produce ugly offspring
so if we cull subhumans from the herd
recessed, deformed ugly incels will cease to exist, its as simple as that tbh
it more or less means you'll never be able to breed specific humans to be attractive for the time period in which they live, it takes about 1.5 to 2 decades for a human to reach reproductive age and another 1.5 to 2 to find out whether they're even attractive, ugly children aren't necessarily ugly adults, or vice versa.That doesn't mean eugenics aren't real
it stops being so clear cut once you realize that most attractive people still have ugly traits, they aren't attractive because they've only got positive traits, they're usually attractive because there's a good balance of positive and negative.thing is a eugenics program would involve males and females as neither would be making the final decision, therefore it would be a million times more effective than a 4/10 ltb getting pumped and dumped by a tyrone
the main reason male incels exist even to this day and age is because ugly, boneless people are allowed to reproduce (mainly ugly and boneless women as theyre the modern day selectors)
attractiveness has a heritability rate of 0.5-0.7 meaning ugly people produce ugly offspring
so if we cull subhumans from the herd
recessed, deformed ugly incels will cease to exist, its as simple as that tbh
this tbhLol @ thinking elites would reduce the global pop. though, the future will be even more subhumans
yet again, the heritability of attractiveness is 0.5-0.7, how many times do i have to tell you thisit more or less means you'll never be able to breed specific humans to be attractive for the time period in which they live, it takes about 1.5 to 2 decades for a human to reach reproductive age and another 1.5 to 2 to find out whether they're even attractive, ugly children aren't necessarily ugly adults, or vice versa.
through natural methods at least, but at that point it stops being eugenics.
it stops being so clear cut once you realize that most attractive people still have ugly traits, they aren't attractive because they've only got positive traits, they're usually attractive because there's a good balance of positive and negative.
most of the 'recessed' traits you're thinking of are lifestyle induced, weak jaws are the result of the foods modern people eat, not their genetics.
these studies are extremely easily manipulated and their conclusions don't mean a whole lot, it reminds me a lot of the study on shoulder to hip ratio in men that concluded that 1.6 was perfect based on imagery that made everyone below or above 1.6 look deformed.yet again, the heritability of attractiveness is 0.5-0.7, how many times do i have to tell you this
brad pitt, jordan barret, hernan drago etc don't have well developed mandibles because they mewed or had had a tough meat heavy diet growing up, they have well developed mandibles because of their genes
when the heritability rate of something is 0.5+ there's only so much the environment can do
meaning most attractive people have a good bone structure thanks to their genes
their bone structure is what makes them attractive which is why a tyrone and chad all while both having polar opposite phenotypes and observable characteristics are seen as sexually attractive individuals
you can select traits such as bone structure and skulls via eugenics hence why its possible to go from a grey wolf to a pug
the positive traits being inherited here are the skulls of the individualsthese studies are extremely easily manipulated and their conclusions don't mean a whole lot, it reminds me a lot of the study on shoulder to hip ratio in men that concluded that 1.6 was perfect based on imagery that made everyone below or above 1.6 look deformed.
what positive traits are being inherited here, and by what beauty standards.
it was less than a decade ago when the ideal female body by modern american standards was considered repulsive.
attractiveness is not the sole determinant, let alone the main one, of genetic quality though. you are conflating eugenics with looksit more or less means you'll never be able to breed specific humans to be attractive for the time period in which they live, it takes about 1.5 to 2 decades for a human to reach reproductive age and another 1.5 to 2 to find out whether they're even attractive, ugly children aren't necessarily ugly adults, or vice versa.
through natural methods at least, but at that point it stops being eugenics.
it stops being so clear cut once you realize that most attractive people still have ugly traits, they aren't attractive because they've only got positive traits, they're usually attractive because there's a good balance of positive and negative.
most of the 'recessed' traits you're thinking of are lifestyle induced, weak jaws are the result of the foods modern people eat, not their genetics.