How cheekbone settedness could be classified more accurately

[Deleted member 240873]

So the way people measure cheekbone settedness is by drawing the line of the midface height and bizygomatic width, looking at that intersection point and seeing if the distance from the base of the line of the midface height to the intersection i devided my midface height is is below or above (I believe I recall) 82%
I think @SlayerJonas made a thread on why this is shit and almost everyone has high set cheekbones by that measurement
So the conclusion of that thread is that not only the highest point of it matters (which is what is currently measured) but "how far the cheekbone extends down"

So heres a way that could be measured
Here we require some math:
First mark some points on the ogee curve we use the method of least squares for a basis of polynomials over R to degree of a reasonable n to find a polynomial that approximates the ogee curve over an interval
Now that we see the shape of the ogee curve:

Something like this
We want to have a way of getting a value for "how high the lower part" is now
We see that it has a turning point at just where the "lower part" visually ends
Now we use the second derivative to determine that point and plug it into our approximation polynomial to receive a value on how high set it its
And for this ideal ranges could be found as with any measurement
So now we use a combination of this measurement alongside the one previously used for a more accurate asessment of height of the cheekbone settedness

I don't really care too much about the introcate details of face ratings (anymore maybe) but just came to mind and thought why not write it down rq as it might be useful for you
Ts is obviously not backed by studies or anything but as we are making up new measurements day by day this might just be an a bit more useful one with the downside that it requires a bit of math

Yea thats it hope this is correct, I have slept for less than 10h of sleep in the last 3 days so it might very well not be or there might be a better way of doing ts

I could maybe make a thread going into the details more in the future if you want

Tags:
@hej1377
@Aryan Incel
@Sadist
@Klasik616
@mohi_100

 

[Deleted member 240873]

@Sayori

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Inb4 dnr

 

[Sayori]

So the way people measure cheekbone settedness is by drawing the line of the midface height and bizygomatic width, looking at that intersection point and seeing if the distance from the base of the line of the midface height to the intersection i devided my midface height is is below or above (I believe I recall) 82%
I think @SlayerJonas made a thread on why this is shit and almost everyone has high set cheekbones by that measurement
So the conclusion of that thread is that not only the highest point of it matters (which is what is currently measured) but "how far the cheekbone extends down"

So heres a way that could be measured
Here we require some math:
First mark some points on the ogee curve we use the method of least squares for a basis of polynomials over R to degree of a reasonable n to find a polynomial that approximates the ogee curve over an interval
Now that we see the shape of the ogee curve:
View attachment 4668963
Something like this
We want to have a way of getting a value for "how high the lower part" is now
We see that it has a turning point at just where the "lower part" visually ends
Now we use the second derivative to determine that point and plug it into our approximation polynomial to receive a value on how high set it its
And for this ideal ranges could be found as with any measurement
So now we use a combination of this measurement alongside the one previously used for a more accurate asessment of height of the cheekbone settedness

I don't really care too much about the introcate details of face ratings (anymore maybe) but just came to mind and thought why not write it down rq as it might be useful for you
Ts is obviously not backed by studies or anything but as we are making up new measurements day by day this might just be an a bit more useful one with the downside that it requires a bit of math

Yea thats it hope this is correct, I have slept for less than 10h of sleep in the last 3 days so it might very well not be or there might be a better way of doing ts

I could maybe make a thread going into the details more in the future if you want

Tags:
@hej1377
@Aryan Incel
@Sadist
@Klasik616
@mohi_100

Dnr

will read

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Dnr

will read

Default Sayori post in a thread with any effort

 

[Sayori]

So the way people measure cheekbone settedness is by drawing the line of the midface height and bizygomatic width, looking at that intersection point and seeing if the distance from the base of the line of the midface height to the intersection i devided my midface height is is below or above (I believe I recall) 82%
I think @SlayerJonas made a thread on why this is shit and almost everyone has high set cheekbones by that measurement
So the conclusion of that thread is that not only the highest point of it matters (which is what is currently measured) but "how far the cheekbone extends down"

So heres a way that could be measured
Here we require some math:
First mark some points on the ogee curve we use the method of least squares for a basis of polynomials over R to degree of a reasonable n to find a polynomial that approximates the ogee curve over an interval
Now that we see the shape of the ogee curve:
View attachment 4668963
Something like this
We want to have a way of getting a value for "how high the lower part" is now
We see that it has a turning point at just where the "lower part" visually ends
Now we use the second derivative to determine that point and plug it into our approximation polynomial to receive a value on how high set it its
And for this ideal ranges could be found as with any measurement
So now we use a combination of this measurement alongside the one previously used for a more accurate asessment of height of the cheekbone settedness

I don't really care too much about the introcate details of face ratings (anymore maybe) but just came to mind and thought why not write it down rq as it might be useful for you
Ts is obviously not backed by studies or anything but as we are making up new measurements day by day this might just be an a bit more useful one with the downside that it requires a bit of math

Yea thats it hope this is correct, I have slept for less than 10h of sleep in the last 3 days so it might very well not be or there might be a better way of doing ts

I could maybe make a thread going into the details more in the future if you want

Tags:
@hej1377
@Aryan Incel
@Sadist
@Klasik616
@mohi_100

Seems interesting but I don't really see much value in this unless ur a very serious rater

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Seems interesting but I don't really see much value in this unless ur a very serious rater

Yea me too, I won't be putting that to use for sure but I thought why not get it out there if it could help and only costs a couole min

 

[Sayori]

Yea me too, I won't be putting that to use for sure but I thought why not geti it out there for people to use

Might as well

you know what would really get reps

The UC device

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

Good thread, i think this way of looking at cheekbone setness makes a lot more sense and most of the reason why i did aqualyx.

Same reason why barret and opry seems similar in terms of zygo setness if you go by bz but when looking its clear Sean's is higher

 

[Sayori]

Good thread, i think this way of looking at cheekbone setness makes a lot more sense and most of the reason why i did aqualyx.

Same reason why barret and opry seems similar in terms of zygo setness if you go by bz but when looking its clear Sean's is higher

join me in zygo filler

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Might as well

you know what would really get reps

The UC device

Yea but idgaf abt helping randoms with that tbh

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

join me in zygo filler

Nigga im trynna highmax my skull not widthmax, only filler ill probs get is maybe chin

And im too much of a bitch to diy that shit

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Good thread, i think this way of looking at cheekbone setness makes a lot more sense and most of the reason why i did aqualyx.

Same reason why barret and opry seems similar in terms of zygo setness if you go by bz but when looking its clear Sean's is higher

Exactly, I thought of those examples aswell, sean has very high lower parts and overall not big cheekbones with that but very angular and shapey ones barrets still are high in both regards but overall bigger and bulgier so the lower part is lower aswell

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Nigga im trynna highmax my skull not widthmax, only filler ill probs get is maybe chin

And im too much of a bitch to diy that shit

You could get it done professionally aswell, would just be a couple hundred bucks more

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Dnr

will read

Nigga im trynna highmax my skull not widthmax, only filler ill probs get is maybe chin

And im too much of a bitch to diy that shit

Who do I tag here
Shouldve prolly put in looksmaxxing aswell right

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

Who do I tag here
Shouldve prolly put in looksmaxxing aswell right

This is what i mean by there being 0 looksmaxxers, this is only relevant to hardmaxxers, or people diy filler or fat dissolver, which is few maybe @Orka Id he decides some more diy in that area

 

[Sayori]

So the way people measure cheekbone settedness is by drawing the line of the midface height and bizygomatic width, looking at that intersection point and seeing if the distance from the base of the line of the midface height to the intersection i devided my midface height is is below or above (I believe I recall) 82%
I think @SlayerJonas made a thread on why this is shit and almost everyone has high set cheekbones by that measurement
So the conclusion of that thread is that not only the highest point of it matters (which is what is currently measured) but "how far the cheekbone extends down"

So heres a way that could be measured
Here we require some math:
First mark some points on the ogee curve we use the method of least squares for a basis of polynomials over R to degree of a reasonable n to find a polynomial that approximates the ogee curve over an interval
Now that we see the shape of the ogee curve:
View attachment 4668963
Something like this
We want to have a way of getting a value for "how high the lower part" is now
We see that it has a turning point at just where the "lower part" visually ends
Now we use the second derivative to determine that point and plug it into our approximation polynomial to receive a value on how high set it its
And for this ideal ranges could be found as with any measurement
So now we use a combination of this measurement alongside the one previously used for a more accurate asessment of height of the cheekbone settedness

I don't really care too much about the introcate details of face ratings (anymore maybe) but just came to mind and thought why not write it down rq as it might be useful for you
Ts is obviously not backed by studies or anything but as we are making up new measurements day by day this might just be an a bit more useful one with the downside that it requires a bit of math

Yea thats it hope this is correct, I have slept for less than 10h of sleep in the last 3 days so it might very well not be or there might be a better way of doing ts

I could maybe make a thread going into the details more in the future if you want

Tags:
@hej1377
@Aryan Incel
@Sadist
@Klasik616
@mohi_100

U know what Ill use it in ur honor tenor

when I do diy filler in 2 weeks

I'm currently on bam 15 I'll do it after this 2 week cycle

 

[Deleted member 240873]

U know what Ill use it in ur honor tenor

when I do diy filler in 2 weeks

I'm currently on bam 15 I'll do it after this 2 week cycle

But tbh for u this prob won't be useful, like you will know your face well enough
And the calculation is not fun at all and prob not easy if you dont know what I'm trying to say in the tread and even then u just get a number that doesn't give info about the shape of em and how it works with the rest of your face
This would be more useful to quantify it and perhaps implement in the fuxking faceiq app as it would requires pretty much just the user to drag some points around

 

[Sayori]

Nigga im trynna highmax my skull not widthmax, only filler ill probs get is maybe chin

And im too much of a bitch to diy that shit

Chin is so easy

tag me if u make a thread on chin filler

 

[Deleted member 240873]

@thecel
@Tigermoggerlol
@pfl
@mohi_100
@Orka

 

[mohito]

To assess zygomatic height, u should look at the start of the cheekbone near the ear and the end of the zygomatic arch. If it slopes downward, its low set but if the distance forms approximately a straight line, its high set. At least this is how i think

 

[Deleted member 240873]

To assess zygomatic height, u should look at the start of the cheekbone near the ear and the end of the zygomatic arch. If it slopes downward, its low set but if the distance forms approximately a straight line, its high set. At least this is how i think

Yea thats how you visually asess it
Ts is more quantifying it in a way that would allow it to be implemented into an app for example

 

[Deleted member 240873]

@abzz
@xzylecrey
@Scandicel
@Fridx
@HighLtn

 

[Fridx]

Just be caucasian theory

 

[abzz!]

@abzz
@xzylecrey
@Scandicel
@Fridx
@HighLtn

explain more in further thread

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Just be caucasian theory

Caucasians are actually by far the ones with the " lower parts the highest"

 

[Deleted member 240873]

explain more in further thread

I'll try to make one in a couple of weeks

 

[Fridx]

Caucasians are actually by far the ones with the " lower parts the highest"

What
Just say if its good or not

 

[Deleted member 240873]

What
Just say if its good or not

Idk how good exactly it is, its more abt measuring it in the thread
But generally I think its very good to have the "lower parts high"

 

[Fridx]

Idk how good exactly it is, its more abt measuring it in the thread
But generally I think its very good to have the "lower parts high"

Idk what u mean with lower parts high but caucasians mostly have good zygos

 

[Scandicel]

So the way people measure cheekbone settedness is by drawing the line of the midface height and bizygomatic width, looking at that intersection point and seeing if the distance from the base of the line of the midface height to the intersection i devided my midface height is is below or above (I believe I recall) 82%
I think @SlayerJonas made a thread on why this is shit and almost everyone has high set cheekbones by that measurement
So the conclusion of that thread is that not only the highest point of it matters (which is what is currently measured) but "how far the cheekbone extends down"

So heres a way that could be measured
Here we require some math:
First mark some points on the ogee curve we use the method of least squares for a basis of polynomials over R to degree of a reasonable n to find a polynomial that approximates the ogee curve over an interval
Now that we see the shape of the ogee curve:
View attachment 4668963
Something like this
We want to have a way of getting a value for "how high the lower part" is now
We see that it has a turning point at just where the "lower part" visually ends
Now we use the second derivative to determine that point and plug it into our approximation polynomial to receive a value on how high set it its
And for this ideal ranges could be found as with any measurement
So now we use a combination of this measurement alongside the one previously used for a more accurate asessment of height of the cheekbone settedness

I don't really care too much about the introcate details of face ratings (anymore maybe) but just came to mind and thought why not write it down rq as it might be useful for you
Ts is obviously not backed by studies or anything but as we are making up new measurements day by day this might just be an a bit more useful one with the downside that it requires a bit of math

Yea thats it hope this is correct, I have slept for less than 10h of sleep in the last 3 days so it might very well not be or there might be a better way of doing ts

I could maybe make a thread going into the details more in the future if you want

Tags:
@hej1377
@Aryan Incel
@Sadist
@Klasik616
@mohi_100

Did read!

Might try this out

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Idk what u mean with lower parts high but caucasians mostly have good zygos

Sean o pry: "high lower part" vs johnny depp with the opposite

 

[Deleted member 240873]

@turkcelfatcel
Your back from the ignore

 

[Fridx]

View attachment 4669238
View attachment 4669239
Sean o pry: "high lower part" vs johnny depp with the opposite

Would you mind telling me about mine if ive sent a pic
Just a part of my zygos

 

[Deleted member 240873]

Would you mind telling me about mine if ive sent a pic
Just a part of my zygos

Send it

 

[xzylecrey]

Seems interesting but I don't really see much value in this unless ur a very serious rater

Yea me too, I won't be putting that to use for sure but I thought why not get it out there if it could help and only costs a couole min