How come there isn't a leaderboard on here for post:rep ratio differences of users?

TalesFromTheSlums

TalesFromTheSlums

Too high IQ to post here or waste any time anymore
Joined
Jan 5, 2025
Posts
1,426
Reputation
3,337
We got a leaderboard for most posts; most reps; most trophies; VIP supporters; mods; etc.

Why is there not a board that lists the top 50 or 100 users by their post:rep ratios, mathematically?

It's quite easy to do with maths -- so it's not really a valid excuse.

I think I actually now know why this doesn't exist...

Because I'd be on that list. The site only wants shitposters/rotters/Chads to join leaderboards, but neglects ratiomoggers. They don't want a list of those with 1:2 or 1:3 ratios because this screws up the "system." More posters gradually scale with equivalent ratios, which means a 1:2 at 50 is 50 to 100, but a 1:2 at 100,000 is 200,000. This means total rep is useless -- it should be RELATIVENESS NOT ABSOLUTENESS. Relative rating always mogs absolutes because they say much more. They tell us how many reps a user gains relative to their posting amount.

The mods/Jews/Master want to create some specific system wherein only SOME "valuations" matter, i.e., who can post the most (usually lifeless, stupid shitposters) or total reps (usually relative to posts, so postmaxxing basically). They don't want to rank users in more useful ways.

There is NO SUCH LIST that -- outstanding -- puts users on by their highest post:rep ratio differentials. No one cares if some retard spams 100,000 posts but has a shit 0.8 ratio.

Usually the more a user posts their reps keep growing, but the ratio is always relative in this effect -- i.e.,
average user on here, from my analysis, has less than a 1:2 ratio 100%.

Most users are ~1:1

Smaller figures are ~1:2

Quite rare to find ~1:3 -- probably not even 3% of users likely.

Finding > 1:4 is extremely rare overall -- less than 1% of users.


In other words, total reps are worthless -- what's important/distinctive is THE RATIO between them, which tells us how often one has to post to reps/how many reps, and how relative these two figures remain in conjunction. Totals don't fucking matter since totals often stay relative by scale -- but the ratio of one to the other is far more important. You dumb fuck "mods."
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: phenylpiracetam, itzyaboyJJ, TiktokUser and 2 others
Top 1% checking in

1739859369912
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: vitaminD, EthiopianMaxxer, Mythicos and 2 others
699E7260 3923 435C 8D84 CFB55263062F
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer, vitaminD and itzyaboyJJ
Top 50% checking in
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: vitaminD, Mythicos and itzyaboyJJ
low iq if you cant figure this out
 
  • +1
Reactions: LLsurgeryEnthusiast and itzyaboyJJ
Is Mine Bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
@itzyaboyJJ @grungymallard97 @EthiopianMaxxer @REGULUS
Look at his bio then read the title of this post :lul::feelskek::feelskek:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: REGULUS, grungymallard97, EthiopianMaxxer and 1 other person
So apparently my post to rep is

That means I'm top 0.01%?

( low IQ I was wrong its normal or decent)

1000176713
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: widdi, HostSamurai and itzyaboyJJ
  • JFL
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer and The Homelander
  • JFL
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
@itzyaboyJJ @grungymallard97 @EthiopianMaxxer @REGULUS
Look at his bio then read the title of this post :lul::feelskek::feelskek:
This guy thinks he’s legit a sigma I’ve seen his posts before:lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer and The Homelander
@itzyaboyJJ @grungymallard97 @EthiopianMaxxer @REGULUS
Look at his bio then read the title of this post :lul::feelskek::feelskek:
too high iq i guess;

1740487675282


@2025cel @5'7 zoomer
 
  • JFL
Reactions: The Homelander, 5'7 zoomer and 2025cel
There would be a bunch of 1 post accounts with 500 reputation
 
  • +1
Reactions: mightbeover
We got a leaderboard for most posts; most reps; most trophies; VIP supporters; mods; etc.

Why is there not a board that lists the top 50 or 100 users by their post:rep ratios, mathematically?

It's quite easy to do with maths -- so it's not really a valid excuse.

I think I actually now know why this doesn't exist...

Because I'd be on that list. The site only wants shitposters/rotters/Chads to join leaderboards, but neglects ratiomoggers. They don't want a list of those with 1:2 or 1:3 ratios because this screws up the "system." More posters gradually scale with equivalent ratios, which means a 1:2 at 50 is 50 to 100, but a 1:2 at 100,000 is 200,000. This means total rep is useless -- it should be RELATIVENESS NOT ABSOLUTENESS. Relative rating always mogs absolutes because they say much more. They tell us how many reps a user gains relative to their posting amount.

The mods/Jews/Master want to create some specific system wherein only SOME "valuations" matter, i.e., who can post the most (usually lifeless, stupid shitposters) or total reps (usually relative to posts, so postmaxxing basically). They don't want to rank users in more useful ways.

There is NO SUCH LIST that -- outstanding -- puts users on by their highest post:rep ratio differentials. No one cares if some retard spams 100,000 posts but has a shit 0.8 ratio.

Usually the more a user posts their reps keep growing, but the ratio is always relative in this effect -- i.e.,
average user on here, from my analysis, has less than a 1:2 ratio 100%.

Most users are ~1:1

Smaller figures are ~1:2

Quite rare to find ~1:3 -- probably not even 3% of users likely.

Finding > 1:4 is extremely rare overall -- less than 1% of users.


In other words, total reps are worthless -- what's important/distinctive is THE RATIO between them, which tells us how often one has to post to reps/how many reps, and how relative these two figures remain in conjunction. Totals don't fucking matter since totals often stay relative by scale -- but the ratio of one to the other is far more important. You dumb fuck "mods."
i had a 1:7 post-rep ratio and would always provide high-iq responses and advice and what not but people would just reply “thanks bro” and not rep my shit so i started shitposting
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Сигма Бой

Similar threads

D
Replies
26
Views
304
Bugmaxxed
Bugmaxxed
mug
Replies
4
Views
64
mug
mug
silently_said
Replies
2
Views
101
Deleted member 99995
D
lifeless
Replies
10
Views
541
Inosebreathonly
I

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top