Alex_notmogging
Gold
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2024
- Posts
- 954
- Reputation
- 648
i will try to keep it as short as possible .
Ive been digging a bit into threads about sarms and ive noticed in every thread it say ,, SARMs causes cancer ,,
and im wondering how do people on this forum figured that out ?
For example ostarine , one of the safest SARMs known to humas atm . Ive tried to do the research and for me the accusations of ,, Sarms causing cancer ,, doesnt really make sense to me and this is why
( in this whole time , im talking about ostarine because its a decently mild SARM )
1. Studies
There is no Human study that properly says that Sarms are causing cancer . ( pretty dumb argument but i had to add it )
2. Logic biology + studys
SARMs selectively activate androgen receptors in muscle and bone, sparing most reproductive and prostate tissue. Unlike anabolic steroids, they avoid high systemic androgen load, reducing stimulation of androgen-sensitive tumor pathways.
In some cancers , SARMs even show antiproliferative effects. Without chronic, high-dose AR overactivation, a general carcinogenic effect is biologically implausible.
3. THE ONLY case that sarms could cause cancer
SARMs still bind androgen receptors, which can promote growth in certain hormone-sensitive tissues under specific genetic or pathological conditions.
Rare pre-existing AR-driven tumors could theoretically be stimulated, though this risk appears extremely low without prolonged, high-dose exposure.
--------------
I'm not trying to shift away the fact that SARMs are not unharmful because they can suppress hormones, impact liver enzymes, and alter lipids, even if cancer risk appears minimal.
But i want to debunk the fact that sarms cause cancer because im seeing threads from 2022 till now , that some people say or said that sarms cause cancer
A example is @Orc ( not trying to disrespect u in any way because its obvious that im not a scientist and u prolly have more knowledge to that whole thing , but i want to hear ur current opinion ) but i just simply want to debunk this whole thematic for once
( and yes i acknowledge , that test is healthier for the average person but that not the point )
Ive been digging a bit into threads about sarms and ive noticed in every thread it say ,, SARMs causes cancer ,,
and im wondering how do people on this forum figured that out ?
For example ostarine , one of the safest SARMs known to humas atm . Ive tried to do the research and for me the accusations of ,, Sarms causing cancer ,, doesnt really make sense to me and this is why
( in this whole time , im talking about ostarine because its a decently mild SARM )
1. Studies
There is no Human study that properly says that Sarms are causing cancer . ( pretty dumb argument but i had to add it )
2. Logic biology + studys
SARMs selectively activate androgen receptors in muscle and bone, sparing most reproductive and prostate tissue. Unlike anabolic steroids, they avoid high systemic androgen load, reducing stimulation of androgen-sensitive tumor pathways.
In some cancers , SARMs even show antiproliferative effects. Without chronic, high-dose AR overactivation, a general carcinogenic effect is biologically implausible.
3. THE ONLY case that sarms could cause cancer
SARMs still bind androgen receptors, which can promote growth in certain hormone-sensitive tissues under specific genetic or pathological conditions.
Rare pre-existing AR-driven tumors could theoretically be stimulated, though this risk appears extremely low without prolonged, high-dose exposure.
--------------
I'm not trying to shift away the fact that SARMs are not unharmful because they can suppress hormones, impact liver enzymes, and alter lipids, even if cancer risk appears minimal.
But i want to debunk the fact that sarms cause cancer because im seeing threads from 2022 till now , that some people say or said that sarms cause cancer
A example is @Orc ( not trying to disrespect u in any way because its obvious that im not a scientist and u prolly have more knowledge to that whole thing , but i want to hear ur current opinion ) but i just simply want to debunk this whole thematic for once
( and yes i acknowledge , that test is healthier for the average person but that not the point )
