How do yall rate? (no greys)

NVM_Ignacio

NVM_Ignacio

Mistral
Joined
Aug 1, 2024
Posts
2,117
Reputation
1,356
I have seen many people rate guys so differently that I dont know what to think. Whats more important, ratios or bonemass? I have heard people saying @androgenic is ugly but hes clearly chad overall and in multiple experiments in dating apps girls thirst over him, so clearly most people got no idea how to rate. What do yall think?
 
Im so brainrotted by wasting time on here I can just instinctually tell also I analyze peoples faces in public without thinking about it

I think 70% ratios 30% bone mass maybe but it changes when theres too much or too little of either
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NVM_Ignacio
Im so brainrotted by wasting time on here I can just instinctually tell also I analyze peoples faces in public without thinking about it
Yeah, Id bet half this forum does the same lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamemandible7
I have seen many people rate guys so differently that I dont know what to think. Whats more important, ratios or bonemass? I have heard people saying @androgenic is ugly but hes clearly chad overall and in multiple experiments in dating apps girls thirst over him, so clearly most people got no idea how to rate. What do yall think?
all i gotta say is ratings on here are accurate, u can tell within seconds after rating so much and been on here what a mtn htn and ltn and cl looklike
 
  • +1
Reactions: NVM_Ignacio and iblamemandible7
Im so brainrotted by wasting time on here I can just instinctually tell also I analyze peoples faces in public without thinking about it

I think 70% ratios 30% bone mass maybe but it changes when theres too much or too little of either
im too blind to see their faces JFL
 
I think a good way to rate is to imagine what the person would have been rated like if the person was unknown and posted on this forum. Good rule of thumb for famous people
 
  • Woah
Reactions: NVM_Ignacio
all i gotta say is ratings on here are accurate, u can tell within seconds after rating so much and been on here what a mtn htn and ltn and cl looklike
Id say yeah they are more accurate here and even more by guys who are good raters but some of these newgens just overrate or underrate insanely so I wouldnt take their opinion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anothersub5 and loyolaxavvierretard
Most people here dont know how to rate since they dont go outside and have forgotten how an average person looks like. For me if someone is average Hltn-Lmtn, if someone looks a little better than the average mtn, if some is good looking but nothing special hmtn-Lhtn, if someone is stereotypically good looking is htn to Lcl and if someone is on a model/celebrity tier good looking is CL to Chad. And Ratios are always more important than bone mass.
 
Most people here dont know how to rate since they dont go outside and have forgotten how an average person looks like. For me if someone is average Hltn-Lmtn, if someone looks a little better than the average mtn, if some is good looking but nothing special hmtn-Lhtn, if someone is stereotypically good looking is htn to Lcl and if someone is on a model/celebrity tier good looking is CL to Chad. And Ratios are always more important than bone mass.
Valid point. idk here ive been rated literally from high ltn to low chadlite (different pics and throughout time) so yeah its obviously inaccurate. Whatever I already know my rating basing on the best raters and my daily life experience
 
  • +1
Reactions: Babillus
Whatever I already know my rating basing on the best raters and my daily life experience
The only real rating and the only one that matters is how people treat you irl I guess.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NVM_Ignacio

Similar threads

mewingmaxxer
Replies
10
Views
337
abcd
A
okokok
Replies
14
Views
262
limerence
limerence
N
Replies
10
Views
256
Skara
Skara
got.daim
Replies
39
Views
414
Meteor21
Meteor21
got.daim
Replies
35
Views
552
flippasav
flippasav

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top