How does the r/truerateme scale compare to psl scale or looksmax.org standards?

[harrys]

I was rated a 6.5/7 there but I feel like if I was rated here I’d barely scratch 5.5. How accurate is r/truerateme and how realistic are psl/looksmax standards?

 

[Deleted member 1560]

If your white, your automatically a 6+ in TRM

 

[harrys]

If your white, your automatically a 6+ in TRM

Not from what I’ve seen it’s more like an automatic 5/5.5 unless you’re overweight.

 

[Deleted member 1560]

Not from what I’ve seen it’s more like an automatic 5 unless your overweight.

The last time I been there, I saw a bug eyed blonde get 6 jfl

 

[Yliaster]

On this forum we rate you without any virtue signaling basically.

 

[harrys]

The last time I been there, I saw a bug eyed blonde get 6 jfl

yeah I feel like people on trm fail to differentiate between the nuances but that’s probably why psl may be considered unrealistic.

 

[harrys]

On this forum we rate you without any virtue signaling basically.

Yeah I can definitely attest to that, people on trm are for the most part reluctant to go below a 4.5/5.

 

[justadude]

biggest difference is they rate by race. if u look at the scale the curries are obviously uglier than the others but still in the same rating slot

 

[harrys]

biggest difference is they rate by race. if u look at the scale the curries are obviously uglier than the others but still in the same rating slot

I completely agree with this, There’s a definitely a problem especially with the updated men’s scale. I also remember seeing one of the admins admitting to struggling to find ethnic people to put in the higher tiers.

 

[Deleted member 1338]

here You will not crack past the 5/10 scale unless you are O'pry

 

[godsmistake]

i've said this numerous times. ratings on a scale of 1 to N make no sense. there are only 2 ways someone can perceive you: visible/invisible to them or attractive/unattractive.

 

[.👽.]

I was rated a 6.5/7 there but I feel like if I was rated here I’d barely scratch 5.5. How accurate is r/truerateme and how realistic are psl/looksmax standards?

7 is pretty good on trm

5,5psl is very good too.

You can pm me your pics

 

[harrys]

i've said this numerous times. ratings on a scale of 1 to N make no sense. there are only 2 ways someone can perceive you: visible/invisible to them or attractive/unattractive.

Don’t you think the way someone rates you, what number they give you is their perception of you? Obviously the more attractive you are the higher your rate.

 

[Deleted member 1507]

We should rate people like this :
Subhuman < Ugly < LT Normie < Normie < HT normie < Chadlite < Chad
Numbers are too confusing since people use a different scale every time.

 

[Deleted member 14138]

I was rated a 6.5/7 there but I feel like if I was rated here I’d barely scratch 5.5. How accurate is r/truerateme and how realistic are psl/looksmax standards?

The scales used here are closer to the truth. Because they are based on biology, reproductive cues, and what the data shows. The data and evidence shows that women are attracted to tall, big boned men, with low body fat, optimal muscular development, and masculine facial features - (low facial body fat, extreme cheek bone definition, hooded eyes). The reddit site is also full of women and women tend to be people pleasers. Who give a high rating to people who don't deserve it. If you are not super ugly, you could even get a 10/10 on reddit. Where as here, if you were just "not ugly" you could get as low as a 1. Remember this is not the blue pilled world here, its mainly black pilled, and unbiased.

 

[Deleted member 14138]

I was rated a 6.5/7 there but I feel like if I was rated here I’d barely scratch 5.5. How accurate is r/truerateme and how realistic are psl/looksmax standards?

I would be willing to give you an honest rating. Out of 10. I don't do the PSL thing because its too confusing. just post it in the rating section.