![Copemaxxing](/data/avatars/l/6/6711.jpg?1650364769)
Copemaxxing
sfs,tyson,ankle,wirsts,clavicle,neanderthal pill
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2020
- Posts
- 13,341
- Reputation
- 22,085
title
@goat2x @AtomicBlackPill69
@goat2x @AtomicBlackPill69
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bruh at measuring the attractivness of the face while the person is smiling. Of fucking course the brachy will do bad when he is judged By that JFLGet some sun and fresh air buddy
But on topic
Objective:
Evaluate the esthetic perception and attractiveness of the smile with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types by brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals.
Material and Methods:
The image of a smiling individual with a mesofacial type of face was changed to create three different facial types with five different buccal corridors (2%, 10%, 15%, 22% and 28%). To achieve this effect, a photo editing software was used (Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Systems Inc, San Francisco, CA, EUA). The images were submitted to evaluators with brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces, who evaluated the degree of esthetic perception and attractiveness by means of a visual analog scale measuring 70 mm. The differences between evaluators were verified by the Mann-Whitney test. All statistics were performed with a confidence level of 95%.
Results:
Brachyfacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Mesofacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2%, 10% and 15% as more attractive. Dolichofacial individuals perceived the mesofacial type of face with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Evaluators of the female sex generally attributed higher scores than the male evaluators.