william2605
Luminary
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2023
- Posts
- 7,522
- Reputation
- 5,596
99% of kids at that age look better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
But not a great one for becoming so goodthat isnt a bad base
His oldest son has a chance because he is the best looking sonBut not a great one for becoming so good
Cope how chico was a mid child and became 9+base is cope until you hit puberty
9+ in my basementCope how chico was a mid child and became 9+
He already had good ratios mid child, but during puberty there is forward and horizontal growth of facial bones, which wouldve made him look more dimorphic.Cope how chico was a mid child and became 9+
You cant be low average and became a 9+He already had good ratios mid child, but during puberty there is forward and horizontal growth of facial bones, which wouldve made him look more dimorphic.
Plus there wouldve been changes in his soft tissue distribution that wouldve made him more angular
Then how do you also think this?You cant be low average and became a 9+
I said thats something is strange since hes really 9+ but he was low averageThen how do you also think this?
View attachment 4708486
What about eyes his eyes become amazingpuberty changes everything
forward growth, jaw projection, brow development, orbital support
most of that matures during mid late teens
a “bad base” doesn’t mean a bad final result bone structure isn’t finished
But why do most children who aren’t good-looking end up becoming “demi-gods” later on, like Chico?puberty changes everything
forward growth, jaw projection, brow development, orbital support
most of that matures during mid late teens
a “bad base” doesn’t mean a bad final result bone structure isn’t finished
his eyes didn’t transformWhat about eyes his eyes become amazing
most kids are not sexually dimorphic yetBut why do most children who aren’t good-looking end up becoming “demi-gods” later on, like Chico?
most kids are very good looking ,chico not .most kids are not sexually dimorphic yet
survivorship bias
you only notice the rare 1% who had elite genetics hidden under baby fat
He didnt looksmax. Its natural, genetics. You will never look like that
kid attractiveness is based on softness and neotenymost kids are very good looking ,chico not .
But became one of the best looking face ,how can you explain this?
Thats is attractiveness not objective beauty rating .kid attractiveness is based on softness and neoteny
adult male attractiveness is based on projection, structure, and sexual dimo
objective beauty is structural harmony at skeletal maturityThats is attractiveness not objective beauty rating .
Amazing userobjective beauty is structural harmony at skeletal maturity
rating a pre puberty face is like judging an unfinished sculpture
Yeah, correctobjective beauty is structural harmony at skeletal maturity
rating a pre puberty face is like judging an unfinished sculpture
Are you kidding me?