How many digits of a number can you remember at once

[Deleted member 80562]

It’s a good test of working memory

 

[Deleted member 110111]

0.

 

[Deleted member 91545]

Idk

 

[Deleted member 80562]

0.

Dumbass

 

[Deleted member 80562]

Idk

Me neither

I’m gonna test

 

[Deleted member 62760]

How do you even check that

 

[Deleted member 110111]

Dumbass

wym. t

 

[Deleted member 80562]

How do you even check that

Generate a random number look at it for a few seconds and then see how many digits you can remember I guess

 

[fluxx]

3.141592654

 

[Deleted member 107430]

80

 

[Deleted member 107430]

average iq is 7
in europe

 

[JohnBaza]

It’s a good test of working memory

7

 

[R@m@]

Theres no numbers in nature

 

[Deleted member 80562]

Theres no numbers in nature

Yes there is

 

[kebinGarnett]

Probably like 11

 

[CantStopTheMog]

It’s a good test of working memory

Probs like 10 idk tho

 

[Deleted member 114545]

it depends on the number. if you tell me 10 gorillion has 60 0s I could recite it easily.

 

[Panzram]

It’s a good test of working memory

I got like 9 or 10 at human benchmark some time ago.

 

[R@m@]

Yes there is

Fibonacci sequence

 

[Deleted member 91545]

I got 9 and then the thing couldnt generate numbers higher

 

[Deleted member 51715]

I used to remember all my friends lunch numbers so I can get second lunches if they weren't there

 

[kebinGarnett]

Too much screen time fucks my memory though.
I remember only being able to remember around 7 digits after rotting

 

[reasonably_likeable]

tfw brain

 

[reasonably_likeable]

why the jfl, goy88? can't take the mog?

i genuinely caged irl when i did this for the first time and it showed 7 as the average result. fucking lol.

 

[Deleted member 91545]

Human Benchmark

humanbenchmark.com

8

 

[reasonably_likeable]

Too much screen time fucks my memory though.
I remember only being able to remember around 7 digits after rotting

stop "rotting" and you'll easily be able to get to 20+, bro! just stop "rotting"!

 

[kebinGarnett]

stop "rotting" and you'll easily be able to get to 20+, bro! just stop "rotting"!

I don’t understand what you’re saying

 

[reasonably_likeable]

I don’t understand what you’re saying

because you are rotting

 

[Deleted member 107430]

View attachment 3458185

tfw brain

i got 218ms reaction time

 

[kebinGarnett]

because you are rotting

Your quotations and commas were confusing me. 20+ seems unrealistic

 

[Deleted member 80562]

Human Benchmark

humanbenchmark.com

10 twice in a row

 

[reasonably_likeable]

i got 218ms reaction time

first try, lmao

no wonder i see through all the low iq coping here so easily (not referring to you, but posts of other copers who genuinely think they are based just because they stumbled upon this shithole of a forum in general)

 

[reasonably_likeable]

Your quotations and commas were confusing me. 20+ seems unrealistic

it's piss-easy with an actual high iq/advanced frontal cortex; people e-stating everything here, iq included, is a different pair of shoes

 

[Deleted member 107430]

first try, lmao

no wonder i see through all the low iq coping here so easily (not referring to you, but posts of other copers who genuinely think they are based just because they stumbled upon this shithole of a forum in general)

brutal mog

 

[Deleted member 118189]

They made me do this on IQ when I was younger, I think it was like 20

 

[Deleted member 80562]

i got 218ms reaction time

 

[reasonably_likeable]

10 twice in a row

how do you even log in to internet forums? do you have someone assisting you?

 

[Deleted member 91545]

first try, lmao

no wonder i see through all the low iq coping here so easily (not referring to you, but posts of other copers who genuinely think they are based just because they stumbled upon this shithole of a forum in general)

I dont believe you at all lmao

 

[reasonably_likeable]

They made me do this on IQ when I was younger, I think it was like 20

no, they haven't. no test includes this, and manual time counting is nowhere as accurate, therefore pointless

 

[Deleted member 107430]

View attachment 3458201

easy to do it on mobile

 

[reasonably_likeable]

I dont believe you at all lmao

oh no

 

[Deleted member 81171]

I did 12 on humanbenchmark

 

[Deleted member 118189]

no, they haven't. no test includes this, and manual time counting is nowhere as accurate, therefore pointless

Yes they have lol, for memory

 

[imightbewrong42]

meh, could do better

i am shitting right now tho

 

[reasonably_likeable]

Yes they have lol, for memory

no, they haven't. did you even read my post?

they have, maybe, given you a paper with a bunch of words and tracked how much of them you could read/say out loud in a minute, but that's it.

besides ... why not just do that test now? i think we both know the answer, little bitch.

 

[imightbewrong42]

where the fuck is the screenshot fuuck

meh, could do better

i am shitting right now tho

 

[Deleted member 118189]

no, they haven't. did you even read my post?

they have, maybe, given you a paper with a bunch of words and tracked how much of them you could read/say out loud in a minute, but that's it.

besides ... why not just do that test now? i think we both know the answer, little bitch.

Okay bro I think I can already tell the type of person that you are, I legit used to take them all the time, whatever no point or arguing lol

 

[reasonably_likeable]

Okay bro I think I can already tell the type of person that you are, I legit used to take them all the time, whatever no point or arguing lol

there is no way you are a biological male

 

[Deleted member 118189]

there is no way you are a biological male

Why? Yes I’m trans

 

[NorwoodAscender]

2