How many humans do you think it takes to kill an elephant

IHATEINDIANS

IHATEINDIANS

Black Truecel
Joined
Nov 6, 2024
Posts
2,731
Reputation
4,640
I'd imagine at least 500 complete bare minimum easily over a thousand realistically

They could kill an insane amount in just a single stomp
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: back/forward, Gonthar, TheBlackpilledOne and 2 others
I'd imagine at least 500 complete bare minimum easily over a thousand realistically

They could kill an insane amount in just a single stomp
bro wassup with these random number humans vs animals debates holy shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: deadstock, TheBlackpilledOne and IHATEINDIANS
Only killable with weapons tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: IHATEINDIANS
A dozen with spears is all it took to take down the largest of the species the straight-tusked elephants that were 2x the size of modern ones


1000180645
1000180646
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: the_machinist_786, TheBlackpilledOne and IHATEINDIANS
One LTTE fighter

@Jason Voorhees
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and TheBlackpilledOne
Attachment
 
  • +1
Reactions: IHATEINDIANS
A dozen with spears is all it took to take down the largest of the spevies the straight-tusked elephants that were 2x the size of modern ones


View attachment 3697840View attachment 3697841
true I should have specified barehanded, that is what I meant
 
true I should have specified barehanded, that is what I meant
Idk why you niggas keep mentioning bare handed. Humans literally never hunted bare handed like ever.

Even early hominins that can barely be called human used basic tools like rocks, sticks, or sharpened bones. It is unnatural for humans to fight without tools. Humans were never meant to fight bare handed.
 
  • Hmm...
  • Nerd
  • +1
Reactions: TheBlackpilledOne, back/forward and IHATEINDIANS
A dozen with spears is all it took to take down the largest of the species the straight-tusked elephants that were 2x the size of modern ones


View attachment 3697840View attachment 3697841
100 homo sapiens vs 30 neanderthals, who would win
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheBlackpilledOne and Jason Voorhees
Idk why you niggas keep mentioning bare handed. Humans literally never hunted bare handed like ever.

Even early hominins that can barely be called human used basic tools like rocks, sticks, or sharpened bones. It is unnatural for humans to fight without tools. Humans were never meant to fight bare handed.
Because it's an interesting hypothetical, not meant to be realistic

Obviously humans are one of if not the only species never made to fight with their own body to it is interesting to put them against animals which are
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Because it's an interesting hypothetical, not meant to be realistic

Obviously humans are one of if not the only species never made to fight with their own body to it is interesting to put them against animals which are
It wouldn't be fun with spears because 10 guys with spears realistically could kill almost anything
 
  • +1
Reactions: back/forward and Jason Voorhees
Idk why you niggas keep mentioning bare handed. Humans literally never hunted bare handed like ever.

Even early hominins that can barely be called human used basic tools like rocks, sticks, or sharpened bones. It is unnatural for humans to fight without tools. Humans were never meant to fight bare handed.
OP nerfs humans so animal would have chance.

And in this case, people themselves become weapons, whether they want it or not. First the weak will die, and then the strong will use their death to their advantage and win. Humans are OP for a reason, after all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees

Similar threads

InanimatePragmatist
Replies
53
Views
435
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
N
Replies
0
Views
99
NateJacobs
N
Aviddegree40571
Replies
12
Views
215
Aviddegree40571
Aviddegree40571

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top