
keife
Master
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2024
- Posts
- 1,521
- Reputation
- 1,420
Title
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Can u send the study’s if u have then also cheers broWhile the exact amount of expansion varies, it can be significant, with some studies reporting mean displacements of 1.5 mm to 2.9 mm in the cheekbone area
got you bhaiCan u send the study’s if u have then also cheers bro
Ik im gonna get Marpe and Malar implantsNot enough to make visible change
Jewish ortho s better let me claim this under insurancegot you bhai
Abedini et al., Three‑dimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro‑implant‑supported maxillary skeletal expansion (2018)
REP ME TOO
- PubMed entry
- Overview and key findings available here:
“Three‑dimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro‑implant‑supported maxillary skeletal expansion” sciencedirect.com+15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+15researchgate.net+15
- Reports mean displacements: 1.5 mm paranasal; 2.5 mm right cheek; 2.9 mm left cheek.
- Full-text (SpringerOpen PDF)
- Downloadable from ResearchGate via Springer:
“Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro-implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion” (2018) researchgate.net
- This version includes in-depth methodology, 3D-plots, and 1-year follow-up data.
![]()
Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro-implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion - PubMed
<p>There are significant changes in paranasal, upper lip, and at both cheeks following expansion using MSE with greater magnitude at the cheeks area. Those changes do not relapse after 1 year (p < 0.05).</p>pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov