How to actually think about a Womens body count (mathematical formulae)

FBl

FBl

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Joined
Aug 31, 2023
Posts
3,510
Reputation
3,994
Wherever I go i see sub5s whining about a womens and mans ideal body count, be it on incel forms or mainstream social medias. This made me wonder if we can have a subjective yet more defined way of thinking about it. Let me know what you think about this and if you have any suggestions.

body_count_threshold
= tier_factor * gender_factor * (attractiveness / 6)
* (age - 22) / (avg_duration_of_relationships)
someone with body count <= body_count_threshold could be acceptable to you.

tier_factor = Tier 1 cities have more scope of dating compared to Tier 2. Hence, tier_factor = 1 (for tier 1 cities), 0.5 (for tier 2 cities)

gender_factor = 1 for women and 1.5 for men considering the lower selectiveness men have for sex by nature (on an average, don't come @ me by mentioning specific exceptions, we already know many men who would be fine with f*cking any whale and also those with higher moral standards).

attractiveness = attractiveness of the person you are considering rating on a scale of 1 to 10. This is to consider the higher number of choices they have had in terms of dating. Remember that this is an upper bound. Men below 5 and women below 3 may have 0 body count till late.

age = age of the person considered. Also, I have considered an avg starting age for serious dating as 22. One can take it to be some other value if you want to use this for people below the age of 22.

avg_duration_of_relationships = what you think should be the time between the start of one relationship, its end until the start of next relationship in years.

Example:

If you are considering a 26 yr old female with an attractiveness rating of 6 in a tier 1 city and you consider that the duration of an average stable relationship till the start of next should be 2 years, you get:

body_count_threshold = 1 * 1 * (6 / 6) * (26 - 22) / 2 = 2
Hence, for you, if her body count <=2, it could be acceptable. according to this. However, if you think 6 months on avg is fine for relationships, this number shoots up to 8. Also, those who think it is fine to change partners every two weeks (hookup and escort cels), their threshold goes to ~100 here for this person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Recessed Life and Deleted member 49130
@KING REIDYZ
 
What if she is below 22 ?
Does that mean she has a negative bc ? Lmao
Girls at age 18 itself cross 5+ easy
 
Wherever I go i see sub5s whining about a womens and mans ideal body count, be it on incel forms or mainstream social medias. This made me wonder if we can have a subjective yet more defined way of thinking about it. Let me know what you think about this and if you have any suggestions.


someone with body count <= body_count_threshold could be acceptable to you.

tier_factor = Tier 1 cities have more scope of dating compared to Tier 2. Hence, tier_factor = 1 (for tier 1 cities), 0.5 (for tier 2 cities)

gender_factor = 1 for women and 1.5 for men considering the lower selectiveness men have for sex by nature (on an average, don't come @ me by mentioning specific exceptions, we already know many men who would be fine with f*cking any whale and also those with higher moral standards).

attractiveness = attractiveness of the person you are considering rating on a scale of 1 to 10. This is to consider the higher number of choices they have had in terms of dating. Remember that this is an upper bound. Men below 5 and women below 3 may have 0 body count till late.

age = age of the person considered. Also, I have considered an avg starting age for serious dating as 22. One can take it to be some other value if you want to use this for people below the age of 22.

avg_duration_of_relationships = what you think should be the time between the start of one relationship, its end until the start of next relationship in years.

Example:

If you are considering a 26 yr old female with an attractiveness rating of 6 in a tier 1 city and you consider that the duration of an average stable relationship till the start of next should be 2 years, you get:


Hence, for you, if her body count <=2, it could be acceptable. according to this. However, if you think 6 months on avg is fine for relationships, this number shoots up to 8. Also, those who think it is fine to change partners every two weeks (hookup and escort cels), their threshold goes to ~100 here for this person.

Get thread mogged.
 
What if she is below 22 ?
Does that mean she has a negative bc ? Lmao
Girls at age 18 itself cross 5+ easy
modify the eq u stupid nigger
 
modify the eq u stupid nigger
attractiveness should be more of a parabola imo.

like so
1700660177113
 
no hymen, no diamond
 
I think formula is good lets see dx/df and dy/df
 
I honestly don’t care cause I’m not marrying a non virgin or at max 1 partner (if he’s dead). If it’s more I’ll just waste her time and if she gets pregnant I’ll be a dead beat dad. Jfl at commiting yourself to anything less than that. I just wouldn’t sleep well at night or be happy about my marriage so might as well avoid a divorce.
 
Wherever I go i see sub5s whining about a womens and mans ideal body count, be it on incel forms or mainstream social medias. This made me wonder if we can have a subjective yet more defined way of thinking about it. Let me know what you think about this and if you have any suggestions.


someone with body count <= body_count_threshold could be acceptable to you.

tier_factor = Tier 1 cities have more scope of dating compared to Tier 2. Hence, tier_factor = 1 (for tier 1 cities), 0.5 (for tier 2 cities)

gender_factor = 1 for women and 1.5 for men considering the lower selectiveness men have for sex by nature (on an average, don't come @ me by mentioning specific exceptions, we already know many men who would be fine with f*cking any whale and also those with higher moral standards).

attractiveness = attractiveness of the person you are considering rating on a scale of 1 to 10. This is to consider the higher number of choices they have had in terms of dating. Remember that this is an upper bound. Men below 5 and women below 3 may have 0 body count till late.

age = age of the person considered. Also, I have considered an avg starting age for serious dating as 22. One can take it to be some other value if you want to use this for people below the age of 22.

avg_duration_of_relationships = what you think should be the time between the start of one relationship, its end until the start of next relationship in years.

Example:

If you are considering a 26 yr old female with an attractiveness rating of 6 in a tier 1 city and you consider that the duration of an average stable relationship till the start of next should be 2 years, you get:


Hence, for you, if her body count <=2, it could be acceptable. according to this. However, if you think 6 months on avg is fine for relationships, this number shoots up to 8. Also, those who think it is fine to change partners every two weeks (hookup and escort cels), their threshold goes to ~100 here for this person.
someone needs to code a website to work these calculations like the female delusion calculator site
 
Bump this high iq thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Recessed Life

Similar threads

Growth Plate
Replies
7
Views
673
matt142
matt142
cryptt
Replies
28
Views
496
cryptt
cryptt
Growth Plate
Replies
8
Views
531
craven
craven
hiku
Replies
16
Views
434
Ppsch88...
Ppsch88...

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top