how to avoid dehiscence on the jaw implant?

RazerGlazer

RazerGlazer

Clown World
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Posts
2,299
Reputation
3,916
Anybody knows?

Anyone had jaw implants and first they had dehiscence and then they revision it and now it looks normal(without dehiscence) ?
 
No way to guarantee it, but from what i've read:
  1. Have a design that doesn't go 'backwards' ie. towards your ear
  2. The more 'downward' the implant stretches the masseter the higher the risk ie. an implant that flares outwards to add width is less risky than one that projects downward to try to lengthen the ramus
  3. Overall size of implant
  4. Get a good surgeon
  5. Having super sharp designs doesnt necessarily increase the risk of it, however it makes it LOOK way worse if you do get dihescence and your implant has super sharp flared edges
Speaking as someone who got implants and had mild dihescence on one side and very mild on the other, it was barely noticeable and didnt spoil the result at all really. I think this is because my design was modest and also not too sharp / flared, although I did try to add vertical height. Had I had a huge set of implants (like this guy below) it would look so much worse
1699908158179

1699908201835


I think other than than those things theres a huge degree of luck involved

If it does happen to you, you can disguise the aesthetic deficit by using fat graft, filler or having a repair, the repairs have low success rate though

The other way you can mask it is having an external incision and covering the exposed portion with aloderm. But some european surgeons wont do this for you, as a lot of maxfacs only do intraoral incisions and they would never risk putting aloderm in through the mouth as because its non-vascularised the infection risk is high so they just stick to fat grafts. As far as I know only Eppley doesn the extraoral aloderm repair

see below:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 46986, hansmoleman and RazerGlazer
No way to guarantee it, but from what i've read:
  1. Have a design that doesn't go 'backwards' ie. towards your ear
  2. The more 'downward' the implant stretches the masseter the higher the risk ie. an implant that flares outwards to add width is less risky than one that projects downward to try to lengthen the ramus
  3. Overall size of implant
  4. Get a good surgeon
  5. Having super sharp designs doesnt necessarily increase the risk of it, however it makes it LOOK way worse if you do get dihescence and your implant has super sharp flared edges
Speaking as someone who got implants and had mild dihescence on one side and very mild on the other, it was barely noticeable and didnt spoil the result at all really. I think this is because my design was modest and also not too sharp / flared, although I did try to add vertical height. Had I had a huge set of implants (like this guy below) it would look so much worse
View attachment 2549904
View attachment 2549905

I think other than than those things theres a huge degree of luck involved

If it does happen to you, you can disguise the aesthetic deficit by using fat graft, filler or having a repair, the repairs have low success rate though

The other way you can mask it is having an external incision and covering the exposed portion with aloderm. But some european surgeons wont do this for you, as a lot of maxfacs only do intraoral incisions and they would never risk putting aloderm in through the mouth as because its non-vascularised the infection risk is high so they just stick to fat grafts. As far as I know only Eppley doesn the extraoral aloderm repair

see below:

Thanks.

Unfortunately mine looks much worse.

Idk man..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231113-193035~2.png
    Screenshot_20231113-193035~2.png
    101.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20231113-193039~2.png
    Screenshot_20231113-193039~2.png
    119.5 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Thanks.

Unfortunately mine looks much worse.

Idk man..
Can I see your designs? Is your plan to get a repair? Who was your surgeon?
 
Can I see your designs? Is your plan to get a repair? Who was your surgeon?
it was giant.

Got operated by Pagnoni.

Im planning a revision, yes. third one. thinking to do a chin wing tbh

1699992999169


1699993010762
 
  • +1
Reactions: bradpittshairline
I also have small divots at my gonions where I got my implants but I always thought it was just the implant being too small for the massetter.
 
No way to guarantee it, but from what i've read:
  1. Have a design that doesn't go 'backwards' ie. towards your ear
  2. The more 'downward' the implant stretches the masseter the higher the risk ie. an implant that flares outwards to add width is less risky than one that projects downward to try to lengthen the ramus
  3. Overall size of implant
  4. Get a good surgeon
  5. Having super sharp designs doesnt necessarily increase the risk of it, however it makes it LOOK way worse if you do get dihescence and your implant has super sharp flared edges
Speaking as someone who got implants and had mild dihescence on one side and very mild on the other, it was barely noticeable and didnt spoil the result at all really. I think this is because my design was modest and also not too sharp / flared, although I did try to add vertical height. Had I had a huge set of implants (like this guy below) it would look so much worse
View attachment 2549904
View attachment 2549905

I think other than than those things theres a huge degree of luck involved

If it does happen to you, you can disguise the aesthetic deficit by using fat graft, filler or having a repair, the repairs have low success rate though

The other way you can mask it is having an external incision and covering the exposed portion with aloderm. But some european surgeons wont do this for you, as a lot of maxfacs only do intraoral incisions and they would never risk putting aloderm in through the mouth as because its non-vascularised the infection risk is high so they just stick to fat grafts. As far as I know only Eppley doesn the extraoral aloderm repair

see below:

Have you done anything to address it? I have a similar amount to you. I’m planning on radiesse filler.
 
@RealSurgerymax proposed a possible solution that involved sewing the muscle to the implant, iirc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: RealSurgerymax
No way to guarantee it, but from what i've read:
  1. Have a design that doesn't go 'backwards' ie. towards your ear
  2. The more 'downward' the implant stretches the masseter the higher the risk ie. an implant that flares outwards to add width is less risky than one that projects downward to try to lengthen the ramus
  3. Overall size of implant
  4. Get a good surgeon
  5. Having super sharp designs doesnt necessarily increase the risk of it, however it makes it LOOK way worse if you do get dihescence and your implant has super sharp flared edges
Speaking as someone who got implants and had mild dihescence on one side and very mild on the other, it was barely noticeable and didnt spoil the result at all really. I think this is because my design was modest and also not too sharp / flared, although I did try to add vertical height. Had I had a huge set of implants (like this guy below) it would look so much worse
View attachment 2549904
View attachment 2549905

I think other than than those things theres a huge degree of luck involved

If it does happen to you, you can disguise the aesthetic deficit by using fat graft, filler or having a repair, the repairs have low success rate though

The other way you can mask it is having an external incision and covering the exposed portion with aloderm. But some european surgeons wont do this for you, as a lot of maxfacs only do intraoral incisions and they would never risk putting aloderm in through the mouth as because its non-vascularised the infection risk is high so they just stick to fat grafts. As far as I know only Eppley doesn the extraoral aloderm repair

see below:


An actually useful comment on this forum? Wow, I must be dreaming. Thanks, man.
 
  • +1
Reactions: politically correct
@RealSurgerymax proposed a possible solution that involved sewing the muscle to the implant, iirc.
its still not guaranteed that it will work tho.
 
  • +1
Reactions: RealSurgerymax
I also have small divots at my gonions where I got my implants but I always thought it was just the implant being too small for the massetter.
that dent its just the naked implant

its not normal
 
that dent its just the naked implant

its not normal
can you show your lower third and how it does look without ur fingers stretching the skin
 
looks a bit narrow but still good obv depending on the before also
1699999566977


I dont think its narrow. the width its perfect otherwise would look to squarish.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bradpittshairline
it was giant.

Got operated by Pagnoni.

Im planning a revision, yes. third one. thinking to do a chin wing tbh

View attachment 2551774

View attachment 2551775
Yeah they are very flared and that is a lot of vertical height that you added so based on what ive read, this is a high risk design, but ive seen bigger designs than this not get the issue

Part of the problem with this much flare is, even though it can amazing if your massetter covers the implant (kind of like the below), it looks obvious if you get dihescence

1700004168113
 
Last edited:
it was giant.

Got operated by Pagnoni.

Im planning a revision, yes. third one. thinking to do a chin wing tbh

View attachment 2551774

View attachment 2551775
This was my original design

1700003115456
1700003125411
1700003135446


I also got dihescence, but because my design was more rounded you basically couldnt even notice it

Don't get me wrong, allthough I was happy with my design from the side and 3/4 profile, I wished at the time I'd flared the gonions a bit more as the result from the front was ok if slightly underwhelming

The design like the one you had look amazing when you have soft tissue coverage, but the sharpness and flare means if you do get dihescence its very obvious

Maybe try a rounder design if you decide to go with implants again, maybe like a half way house between what you got and the rounder design in these pics, but no guarantees either way
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: normie_joe
This was my original design

View attachment 2552021View attachment 2552022View attachment 2552023

I also got dihescence, but because my design was more rounded you basically couldnt even notice it

The design like the one you had look amazing when you have soft tissue coverage, but the sharpness and flare means if you do get dihescence its very obvious

Maybe try a rounder design if you decide to go with implants again

Did you finally get another implant after bimax?
 
View attachment 2552019
So this indentation is what, a gap between the implant and the bone?
So its either dihescence or implant reveal,
1700003555693






 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16280
So its either dihescence or implant reveal,
View attachment 2552032





Thanks. I think implant reveal is what I have. My implant design provided vertical augmentation because my ramus was quite short, so it was necessary. But I’m hoping when I add radiesse the dents smooth out. Sounds like it should help.
 
Thanks.

Unfortunately mine looks much worse.

Idk man..
I have a bunch of questions, hope this isn’t too much but grateful if you answer.

What was the post op care routine?

Were there any specific instructions you found challenging to follow?

Any specific event or discomfort before noticing the dehiscence?

What do you think caused it?

What did Paganini have to say about it? Will you return to him for the revision?

Did he make any change to your recovery protocol?

Any advice for someone about to do the same thing?

What would you have done differently in hindsight?
 
Yeah they are very flared and that is a lot of vertical height that you added so based on what ive read, this is a high risk design, but ive seen bigger designs than this not get the issue

Part of the problem with this much flare is, even though it can amazing if your massetter covers the implant (kind of like the below), it looks obvious if you get dihescence

View attachment 2552053
This guy got implants?
 
This guy got implants?
no but this is how the result of flared implants is supposed to look if your get muscle coverage, it mimics the look of people who naturally have flared gonions like the below

1700089253768
 
No way to guarantee it, but from what i've read:
  1. Have a design that doesn't go 'backwards' ie. towards your ear
  2. The more 'downward' the implant stretches the masseter the higher the risk ie. an implant that flares outwards to add width is less risky than one that projects downward to try to lengthen the ramus
  3. Overall size of implant
  4. Get a good surgeon
  5. Having super sharp designs doesnt necessarily increase the risk of it, however it makes it LOOK way worse if you do get dihescence and your implant has super sharp flared edges
Speaking as someone who got implants and had mild dihescence on one side and very mild on the other, it was barely noticeable and didnt spoil the result at all really. I think this is because my design was modest and also not too sharp / flared, although I did try to add vertical height. Had I had a huge set of implants (like this guy below) it would look so much worse
View attachment 2549904
View attachment 2549905

I think other than than those things theres a huge degree of luck involved

If it does happen to you, you can disguise the aesthetic deficit by using fat graft, filler or having a repair, the repairs have low success rate though

The other way you can mask it is having an external incision and covering the exposed portion with aloderm. But some european surgeons wont do this for you, as a lot of maxfacs only do intraoral incisions and they would never risk putting aloderm in through the mouth as because its non-vascularised the infection risk is high so they just stick to fat grafts. As far as I know only Eppley doesn the extraoral aloderm repair

see below:

I have a coworker who just had 10mm jaw implant, great angularity on the side, but looks rounded from the from, cause angles are behind the masseters
Like you said his implant are back far towards the bone
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
14
Views
268
2marc1
2marc1
S
Replies
10
Views
337
übermog
übermog
B
Replies
1
Views
83
Youㅤ
Y
Dot1
Replies
28
Views
467
Keylozz
Keylozz

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top