How to combat overpopulation

[Eriot Lodger]

GMO, birth control, gender equality, black pill, MGTOW, feminism, soy and raising general living standards worldwide all contribute to reducing the population.

Fewer people means fewer mouths to feed and fewer ideas of conflicting interests. If there was only 100K people then this earth could be a heaven, but unfortunately it's hell.

Post more examples of how to make the world a better place.

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Mass genocide

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Also turning more people gay ded srs

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Also turning more people gay ded srs

This forum is good at that

 

[Sprinkles]

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Also not keeping people alive for no reason. E.g. old people, criminals etc. People over 65 should be refused healthcare

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Also not keeping people alive for no reason. E.g. old people, criminals etc. People over 65 should be refused healthcare

I would be in favor of the death penalty, but keeping murderers alive is probably better from a long-term perspective. Paedophiles can also cause trauma that makes people grow up to stray away from the nuclear family.

The idea of not treating the old is very cruel and I also think that spending medical supplies on people who are non-fertile would increase the odds of young people to die off and not having children instead.

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Humans torture animals in the animal agriculture industry. They're poisoning the soil.

 

[optimisticzoomer]

I would be in favor of the death penalty, but keeping murderers alive is probably better from a long-term perspective. Paedophiles can also cause trauma that makes people grow up to stray away from the nuclear family.

The idea of not treating the old is very cruel and I also think that spending medical supplies on people who are non-fertile would increase the odds of young people to die off and not having children instead.

Birth rates aren't increasing though. While it's good to lower birth rates (people cope with muh this leads to more old people... Yes but the human population is not at risk of an extinction, and even if it was, who cares?), the main reason why the population has increased so much is healthcare, less babies dying, people living longer. So the most natural approach is to reduce the unnatural intervention of death which would usually control the population

 

[moggathon]

GMO, birth control, gender equality, black pill, MGTOW, feminism, soy and raising general living standards worldwide all contribute to reducing the population.

Fewer people means fewer mouths to feed and fewer ideas of conflicting interests. If there was only 100K people then this earth could be a heaven, but unfortunately it's hell.

Post more examples of how to make the world a better place.

Genocide

 

[Entschuldigung]

Bombing India would be a good one

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Birth rates aren't increasing though. While it's good to lower birth rates (people cope with muh this leads to more old people... Yes but the human population is not at risk of an extinction, and even if it was, who cares?), the main reason why the population has increased so much is healthcare, less babies dying, people living longer. So the most natural approach is to reduce the unnatural intervention of death which would usually control the population

I don't care about what's natural. An ended life is always a victory, but the best way not to have more people is to attack the problem at the root cause, which is birth. The old also don't cause as many problems as the young and expend less calories.

 

[WhoTookVendetta]

Bombing India would be a good one

and africa

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Bombing India would be a good one

The west consumes more resources, so they should be prioritized

 

[optimisticzoomer]

I don't care about what's natural. An ended life is always a victory, but the best way not to have more people is to attack the problem at the root cause, which is birth. The old also don't cause as many problems as the young and expend less calories.

An ended life is always a victory but you told me it was cruel to stop saving old people?

Ok I go back to my first point. We need to wipe out the entirety of India and China, and Africa.

Ideally we must come up with a way of mass sterilisation of males so they can't get anyone pregnant. Something that wouldn't have detrimental ecological impacts

 

[Afterchanger]

world is not overpopulated but sure whatever you say netanyahu

 

[Lefty Rankin]

GMO, birth control, gender equality, black pill, MGTOW, feminism, soy and raising general living standards worldwide all contribute to reducing the population.

Fewer people means fewer mouths to feed and fewer ideas of conflicting interests. If there was only 100K people then this earth could be a heaven, but unfortunately it's hell.

Post more examples of how to make the world a better place.

You're very naive to to think this place would be heaven if there were only 100k mouths to feed. Is this post possibly satire?

 

[Eriot Lodger]

An ended life is always a victory but you told me it was cruel to stop saving old people?

Ok I go back to my first point. We need to wipe out the entirety of India and China, and Africa.

Ideally we must come up with a way of mass sterilisation of males so they can't get anyone pregnant. Something that wouldn't have detrimental ecological impacts

I would ideally be in favor of ending the animal agriculture industry too, but I think we should just stop breeding them and let currently existing animals live out their natural lives. Same with people.

A nuclear program is an interesting idea, but it should encompass all the continents. Anything less would be arbitrary.

 

[optimisticzoomer]

I would ideally be in favor of ending the animal agriculture industry too, but I think we should just stop breeding them and let currently existing animals live out their natural lives. Same with people.

A nuclear program is an interesting idea, but it should encompass all the continents. Anything less would be arbitrary.

Yes, based
At least stopping cattle production

 

[Eriot Lodger]

You're very naive to to think this place would be heaven if there were only 100k mouths to feed. Is this post possibly satire?

People would get along better if we lived in small communities. Tribalism could be tackles differently now with the current level of technology, utilities such as the internet and more access to general resources.

 

[Debetro]

Euthanasia and sterilization

 

[Lefty Rankin]

People would get along better if we lived in small communities. Tribalism could be tackles differently now with the current level of technology, utilities such as the internet and more access to general resources.

Yeah, but you underestimate how evil people are. Some people don't want to get along. Some just wanna be fucking mean. Just cause. And they want power. It would just be a matter of time before some mean mother fucker came along, who's clever enough to not get himself killed along the way, and take a great deal of power by any means necessary. And a great many people would follow someone just like that. People are stupid too.

100k with all the resources/technology we have at the moment would be a bloodbath unlike anything the world has ever seen before, proportionally speaking.

 

[thereallegend]

not a real thing

 

[📎♿️⚙️]

By killing all sex havers

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Yeah, but you underestimate how evil people are. Some people don't want to get along. Some just wanna be fucking mean. Just cause. And they want power. It would just be a matter of time before some mean mother fucker came along, who's clever enough to not get himself killed along the way, and take a great deal of power by any means necessary. And a great many people would follow someone just like that. People are stupid too.

100k with all the resources/technology we have at the moment would be a bloodbath unlike anything the world has ever seen before, proportionally speaking.

But that also goes to my point that the world would be better off with fewer people. Even if all the 100K ended up in a bad spot it would still be less than the hundreds of millions who suffer disease, oppression, tragedy, starvation etc. The proportions seem irrelevant to me, but even if I grant you that the amount of sufferers relative to the sum total is more important than the sum total of sufferers then I still don't see any substantive argument for why that would end up being the case. More people, more psychopaths being born, more risk of fuck up, that's how I see it.

 

[Lefty Rankin]

But that also goes to my point that the world would be better off with fewer people. Even if all the 100K ended up in a bad spot it would still be less than the hundreds of millions who suffer disease, oppression, tragedy, starvation etc. The proportions seem irrelevant to me, but even if I grant you that the amount of sufferers relative to the sum total is more important than the sum total of sufferers then I still don't see any substantive argument for why that would end up being the case. More people, more psychopaths being born, more risk of fuck up, that's how I see it.

Humans will only ever fuck up. Doesn't matter what you try to do to prevent it.

 

[Eriot Lodger]

By killing all sex havers

Decrease STD awareness. Then again, condoms are good because they prevent fertilization. They're a double-edged sword in that sense.

 

[canthal]

nuke india

 

[Eriot Lodger]

Humans will only ever fuck up. Doesn't matter what you try to do to prevent it.

So how many would you advocate for; 10K, 1K? Give me a number

 

[Eriot Lodger]

nuke india

What did the indians ever do?

 

[Lefty Rankin]

So how many would you advocate for; 10K, 1K? Give me a number

About 20 billion more than we've already got at the moment.

 

[sickdawgie]

it's finally been solved thank you

 

[Eriot Lodger]

About 20 billion more than we've already got at the moment.

So you want total hell?

 

[Eriot Lodger]

it's finally been solved thank you

Wrong thread but glad it helped!

 

[sickdawgie]

Wrong thread but glad it helped!

No I meant thanks for solving overpopulation, but the sugar did help a bit I think so yea

 

[canthal]

What did the indians ever do?

too many kids plus they smell funny

 

[Eriot Lodger]

too many kids plus they smell funny

They have the highest ratio of LGBT inhabitants though which would help in erasing the genders and nuking the nuclear family. Plus a lot of the babies are born with grotesque deformities that could help people stray away from faith and god.

 

[Lefty Rankin]

So you want total hell?

I don't believe it would look like that. More people = more innovation and cool shit that we cannot yet imagine. Don't fall for the stupid globalist lies that we'd all starve. Or that nonsense about climate change.

I mean, I do believe in climate change. This evenings' climate was a little bit cooler than yesterday evenings'.

 

[Eriot Lodger]

I don't believe it would look like that. More people = more innovation and cool shit that we cannot yet imagine. Don't fall for the stupid globalist lies that we'd all starve. Or that nonsense about climate change.

I mean, I do believe in climate change. This evenings' climate was a little bit cooler than yesterday evenings'.

I think we won't need that many people soon when A.I. takes over, even the creative endeavors like art and innovation. Maybe in the next 100 years.

 

[Lefty Rankin]

I think we won't need that many people soon when A.I. takes over, even the creative endeavors like art and innovation. Maybe in the next 100 years.

AI will always be flawed no matter what. Art will lose its value.