How to convo mog chad? (Socialmaxxing key)

[irrumator praetor]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

 

[Mizi44]

 

[lokit]

sure whatever bro

 

[irrumator praetor]

View attachment 4246004

its worth bhai

 

[irrumator praetor]

sure whatever bro

bros getting flashbacks from the post

 

[ykim]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

Please stop conveying social charisma and conversational skills as "mogging"
You are only exercising your little neurons and personality traits.
Conversations are flow like tennis, looks are only relevant for conversational appeal. Intelligence and terminology matters most in conversations.
Stop talking like an absolute retard, fucking;
"convomog"
"socialmax"
"socialmaxxing"
"I can socialmax with people i convomog"
Greycellery and low intellect radiation coming through my screen like a radioisotope blasting my retinas.
You are talking complete nonsense and have no idea how the human mind operates in social settings, nor sociology altogether.

Please for the love of your own neural activation read a book or go outside and talk to "subhumans". You will realise they are intellectually superior to you and will outrun your low intellect and giggle at this watered down post.

 

[irrumator praetor]

Please stop conveying social charisma and conversational skills as "mogging"
You are only exercising your little neurons and personality traits.
Conversations are flow like tennis, looks are only relevant for conversational appeal. Intelligence and terminology matters most in conversations.
Stop talking like an absolute retard, fucking;
"convomog"
"socialmax"
"socialmaxxing"
"I can socialmax with people i convomog"
Greycellery and low intellect radiation coming through my screen like a radioisotope blasting my retinas.
You are talking complete nonsense and have no idea how the human mind operates in social settings, nor sociology altogether.

Please for the love of your own neural activation read a book or go outside and talk to "subhumans". You will realise they are intellectually superior to you and will outrun your low intellect and giggle at this watered down post.

Brother I derive this from my rich and varied experience and you're literally grey

This might be a brutal pill to swallow but I suggest you explore a lot of varied environments. What people find interesting and convo worthy is relative, same as their status (wealth-looks-experiences). Its undeniable. You probably couldn't talk with opry or chico and possibly relate on anything other than surface level. You'd end up boring the shit out of them. Hence, even if you're able to connect, they look down upon you. This is true everywhere: richer people looking down upon poorer, chads looking down upon incels. Factor in variation and put everything on a spectrum, this is what you get. A system of relative connection and social ability, some people being literal gods compared to others, in extreme cases. Its water, but if you weight people with this in mind more often, you will be able to notice why you're more confident around others and less around some other people. Why you've better standing in group A rather than group B.

The average person is able to charm a retard but unable to entertain a top percentile person. Simple as. You can flow very well with subhumans and people you mog, similar to swimming in calmer waters. Yes, intelligence matters, but experiences make the difference. And chad inevitably mogs across class and looks experience.

 

[irrumator praetor]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

Also I would like to add, your relative status is determined immediately by high status or successful people, they see what you're about immediately and rank you accordingly. The more successful the person, the faster and better they figure you out. Once that happens they of course treat you accordingly, because people don't like to waste time. Water again, but they also have tried and tested ways of asking specific questions to figure you out ASAP. Its like the snap of a finger, the social equivalent of the 0.13 milliseconds or whatever. Women do appearance wise, men are actually worse cuz they rate you appearance and status wise.

 

[sexgod]

Please stop conveying social charisma and conversational skills as "mogging"
You are only exercising your little neurons and personality traits.
Conversations are flow like tennis, looks are only relevant for conversational appeal. Intelligence and terminology matters most in conversations.
Stop talking like an absolute retard, fucking;
"convomog"
"socialmax"
"socialmaxxing"
"I can socialmax with people i convomog"
Greycellery and low intellect radiation coming through my screen like a radioisotope blasting my retinas.
You are talking complete nonsense and have no idea how the human mind operates in social settings, nor sociology altogether.

Please for the love of your own neural activation read a book or go outside and talk to "subhumans". You will realise they are intellectually superior to you and will outrun your low intellect and giggle at this watered down post.

aaalright shakespeare

 

[PsychoDsk]

Honestly
The existential dread we call life is always a cool subject to bring up
If they look at you weird or seem disinterested you can brush it off as them being iqcels and still mog them

 

[irrumator praetor]

Honestly
The existential dread we call life is always a cool subject to bring up
If they look at you weird or seem disinterested you can brush it off as them being iqcels and still mog them

Bro this is about actually being fun at parties and events, in group gatherings. Not reducing all conversation to first principle topics like life and death

 

[ykim]

Still talking complete nonsense, agree to disagree I guess.

 

[irrumator praetor]

In other words: you can only social max with people that are relative or equal to you (on your level), you can rarely shoot upward, and in order to properly do so, you must genuinely looks and class ascend (so attain way better and more experiences related to that ascension). No "smart networking" until you ascend (thus appearance and success are an important part of operating in society, it seems shallow but its just functional)

 

[ykim]

Brother I derive this from my rich and varied experience and you're literally grey

This might be a brutal pill to swallow but I suggest you explore a lot of varied environments. What people find interesting and convo worthy is relative, same as their status (wealth-looks-experiences). Its undeniable. You probably couldn't talk with opry or chico and possibly relate on anything other than surface level. You'd end up boring the shit out of them. Hence, even if you're able to connect, they look down upon you. This is true everywhere: richer people looking down upon poorer, chads looking down upon incels. Factor in variation and put everything on a spectrum, this is what you get. A system of relative connection and social ability, some people being literal gods compared to others, in extreme cases. Its water, but if you weight people with this in mind more often, you will be able to notice why you're more confident around others and less around some other people. Why you've better standing in group A rather than group B.

The average person is able to charm a retard but unable to entertain a top percentile person. Simple as. You can flow very well with subhumans and people you mog, similar to swimming in calmer waters. Yes, intelligence matters, but experiences make the difference. And chad inevitably mogs across class and looks experience.

I'm beginning to understand your point now you aren't watering it down.
The top percentile have a strong ego and otherwise the rest is described as the Halo Effect in psychology.

 

[ykim]

But your point on "You probably couldn't talk with Opry or Chico and possibly relate with them on anything besides surface level and would end up boring the shit out of them" is completely taking it out of the water and stripping context and human realism.
You couldn't even get the point of looking Bill Gates in the eyes, nevermind anybody out of your class.
If you were more realistic I'd understand your point, otherwise it's irrelevance.

 

[Imogincels]

Talk to people in ur own social hierachy if u try to befriend guys above you they see u as a pathetic joke

 

[ykim]

And I can understand we both have different worldviews, I study psychology and sociology and you go by blackpill. That's fair enough, I can understand that since most of you lack any logic whatsoever and anyone who says otherwise to looks is a "grey".

 

[PsychoDsk]

Bro this is about actually being fun at parties and events, in group gatherings. Not reducing all conversation to first principle topics like life and death

In other words: you can only social max with people that are relative or equal to you (on your level), you can rarely shoot upward, and in order to properly do so, you must genuinely looks and class ascend (so attain way better and more experiences related to that ascension). No "smart networking" until you ascend (thus appearance and success are an important part of operating in society, it seems shallow but its just functional)

I disagree bro
It’s literally all about being charismatic and portraying friendly body language. Sure some billionaires wouldn’t glimpse at you but 99% of ppl are just regular ppl (no matter what kind of status they have)
And ofcourse being goodlooking accounts for 80% of the work anyway

People don’t live in different dimensions, there’s always something relatable between each other, it’s literally all about how charismatic u are and how you make the other person feel

 

[ykim]

I disagree bro
It’s literally all about being charismatic and portraying friendly body language. Sure some billionaires wouldn’t glimpse at you but 99% of ppl are just regular ppl (no matter what kind of status they have)
And ofcourse being goodlooking accounts for 80% of the work anyway

People don’t live in different dimensions, there’s always something relatable between each other, it’s literally all about how charismatic u are and how you make the other person feel

Nailed it, this guy doesn't understand any fundamental of psychology or human sociology.

 

[PsychoDsk]

Nailed it, this guy doesn't understand any fundamental of psychology or human sociology.

Ofcourse I don’t because I don’t care and it’s simply irrelevant
U just talk and it flows, overcomplicating anything is just useless

 

[irrumator praetor]

I'm beginning to understand your point now you aren't watering it down.
The top percentile have a strong ego and otherwise the rest is described as the Halo Effect in psychology.

its not about successful people being irrationally egotistic, its about genuine 1:1 eye-level connection that equally entertains both parties. You might consider the convo with chad interesting, but if he merely entertained you, he doesn't reciprocate. Talking about on average. Not for every single topic or scenario. Jestering is excluded, thats not social maxxing at all. Yes, theres also the halo effect on top of all that. But what you may find interesting chad may find it simply boring or something he already experienced enough of. He most likely experienced more interesting and fun things, thus would inevitably consider you behind him, in terms of experiences and relation. Im overly generalizing, you may disagree with me because we're thinking of different things or scenarios. You can bring up an example where you think Im wrong and I can illuminate what I mean

 

[ykim]

Ofcourse I don’t because I don’t care and it’s simply irrelevant
U just talk and it flows, overcomplicating anything is just useless

I was saying OP doesn't not you.

 

[PsychoDsk]

I was saying OP doesn't not you.

Yes agree
OP u should learn human sociology and psychology ASAP
Start studymaxxing!!

 

[irrumator praetor]

And I can understand we both have different worldviews, I study psychology and sociology and you go by blackpill. That's fair enough, I can understand that since most of you lack any logic whatsoever and anyone who says otherwise to looks is a "grey".

I go by general blackpill terms and some experience. I also use "chad" generally, along axis of both wealth and looks. Chad is also relative

 

[ykim]

its not about successful people being irrationally egotistic, its about genuine 1:1 eye-level connection that equally entertains both parties. You might consider the convo with chad interesting, but if he merely entertained you, he doesn't reciprocate. Talking about on average. Not for every single topic or scenario. Jestering is excluded, thats not social maxxing at all. Yes, theres also the halo effect on top of all that. But what you may find interesting chad may find it simply boring or something he already experienced enough of. He most likely experienced more interesting and fun things, thus would inevitably consider you behind him, in terms of experiences and relation. Im overly generalizing, you may disagree with me because we're thinking of different things or scenarios. You can bring up an example where you think Im wrong and I can illuminate what I mean

I'd absolutely love to enlighten you on my view so we can come to an agreement but I really cannot be bothered. Might do tomorrow

 

[irrumator praetor]

It’s literally all about being charismatic and portraying friendly body language.

Clearly I should define what the goal is: both parties feel like they've somehow gained from the interaction, it was funny or interesting, hence both sides think the other side is cool. So, in group approval. Friendly body language is a default, being charismatic is relative (at a certain point, it stops being relative for the vast majority ie. you reach charisma for normies. Charisma becomes more demanding the higher up you go though. People of higher magnitude simply require more from you, "better" charisma)

People don’t live in different dimensions

of course some do. You just didn't think about cases where they do. Comparisons are rare. You could never relate to a member of royalty. Being next to them for a week will destroy your self esteem and confidence. So and so

 

[Puffa234234]

Greycellery and low intellect radiation coming through my screen like a radioisotope blasting my retinas.
You are talking complete nonsense and have no idea how the human mind operates in social settings, nor sociology altogether.

Please for the love of your own neural activation read a book or go outside and talk to "subhumans". You will realise they are intellectually superior to you and will outrun your low intellect and giggle at this watered down post.

How bro felt after typing this:

 

[irrumator praetor]

Yes agree
OP u should learn human sociology and psychology ASAP
Start studymaxxing!!

maybe later

 

[ykim]

Clearly I should define what the goal is: both parties feel like they've somehow gained from the interaction, it was funny or interesting, hence both sides think the other side is cool. So, in group approval. Friendly body language is a default, being charismatic is relative (at a certain point, it stops being relative for the vast majority ie. you reach charisma for normies. Charisma becomes more demanding the higher up you go though. People of higher magnitude simply require more from you, "better" charisma)

of course some do. You just didn't think about cases where they do. Comparisons are rare. You could never relate to a member of royalty. Being next to them for a week will destroy your self esteem and confidence. So and so

If you didn't water the first thread down so much and explained it like this then I'd have read it completely differently.
You are making sense now besides a handful of things.

 

[PsychoDsk]

Being next to them for a week will destroy your self esteem and confidence. So and so

Meh, depends what you base your self esteem and confidence on.

And no one has anything to gain from an interaction nor is that the purpose of one usually. Most interactions and human contact is simply to battle boredom and release endorphins aka feel something.

I’m not talking with my broke junkie homeboy because I want something from him nor is he talking to me to gain something. We just hit it off and bonded. That’s how it usually goes.

I mean royalty is an extreme exaggeration, you’d never get in contact with any of them anyway and if u did there’s still a chance u form a bond just by entertaining each other. Convos don’t need to have an end-goal or something relatable to each other, if a person falls from the stairs in an odd way while you’re talking and u both just start laughing, voila you’re bonded

It’s not that deep imo
Either u click with someone or u don’t

 

[kranerman23123]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

Teen detected per behavior #5

I can tell if you are a teen/teen cel evisceration thread

You all make it very obvious, just know if you are a teen I can immediately tell based off the way you type Notable teen behaviors: trying really hard to fit in by using buzzwords and lingo such as "jfl, cage, brutal" etc Being overly aggressive and calling everyone "you're retarded, you...

looksmax.org

 

[irrumator praetor]

But your point on "You probably couldn't talk with Opry or Chico and possibly relate with them on anything besides surface level and would end up boring the shit out of them" is completely taking it out of the water and stripping context and human realism.
You couldn't even get the point of looking Bill Gates in the eyes, nevermind anybody out of your class.
If you were more realistic I'd understand your point, otherwise it's irrelevance.

The examples are extremes for obvious reasons. If you look at your immediate environment though, there has to always be the more successful person you can relate less with. If that isn't the case, then you aren't in an environment where you're surrounded by or have some people more successful than you. If the gap between you and them isn't too big, you could connect (more likely in the immediate environment). But lets take a popular example for this gap: the classic college incel meeting college chad. The gap in potentiality here is so big, my reasoning finds rational and real life grounding. This relates to the forum. Lets look at a corporate workplace: same case. It depends on the environment. If you're in a diverse environment that has a hierarchy, my rationale applies more than "everyone is equal bro if you just smile" no, people judge you and a lot of them already form opinions of you. Its a competitive environment, rather than a friendly one. This is also the environment strangers find themselves in, its the more common environment where we're more likely in need of finding an ingroup aka socialmaxxing. My reasoning pertains to socialmaxxing

 

[irrumator praetor]

Teen detected per behavior #5

I can tell if you are a teen/teen cel evisceration thread

You all make it very obvious, just know if you are a teen I can immediately tell based off the way you type Notable teen behaviors: trying really hard to fit in by using buzzwords and lingo such as "jfl, cage, brutal" etc Being overly aggressive and calling everyone "you're retarded, you...

looksmax.org

bro notices patterns

 

[irrumator praetor]

Meh, depends what you base your self esteem and confidence on

real shit such as money and looks

And no one has anything to gain from an interaction nor is that the purpose of one usually

Consciously, some of the time it isn't. Subconsciously and in all other cases, it is. Relating to ingroups (friends, friend circles) (we might be in different environments) it absolutely always actually is. A relationship is a contract. I wanna hang out with you because of x and y, ...

I’m not talking with my broke junkie homeboy because I want something from him

L social maxxing, If your roles were reversed he would likely have left u in the dust, just saying. Also likely you're wasting your time or not getting quality social time spent like you could've

That’s how it usually goes.

seriously depends

and if u did there’s still a chance u form a bond just by entertaining each other.

no

if a person falls from the stairs in an odd way while you’re talking and u both just start laughing, voila you’re bonded

sorry this is cope

Either u click with someone or u don’t

this is true

 

[Foreverbrad]

All interactions are transactions, to speak with a Chad you have to offer him something in return for the reflected glory of his status.

 

[HighIQ ubermensch]

You're saying this like Chad knows any more than subhumans who gossip all day

 

[Napoleon1800]

Please stop conveying social charisma and conversational skills as "mogging"
You are only exercising your little neurons and personality traits.
Conversations are flow like tennis, looks are only relevant for conversational appeal. Intelligence and terminology matters most in conversations.
Stop talking like an absolute retard, fucking;
"convomog"
"socialmax"
"socialmaxxing"
"I can socialmax with people i convomog"
Greycellery and low intellect radiation coming through my screen like a radioisotope blasting my retinas.
You are talking complete nonsense and have no idea how the human mind operates in social settings, nor sociology altogether.

Please for the love of your own neural activation read a book or go outside and talk to "subhumans". You will realise they are intellectually superior to you and will outrun your low intellect and giggle at this watered down post.

grey attempts to iqmog the 2020 OG

 

[irrumator praetor]

You're saying this like Chad knows any more than subhumans who gossip all day

yes he does

 

[Restitutor Orbis]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

Simply having excess information about a large range of conversational topics does not give you the edge in a conversation. That edge comes from wit, charm and empathy. Let me give an example:

Person 1 (charming, witty, empathic, unknowing) has a conversation with person 2 (non-charming, dry, less empathic, knowing). In that case, person 1 will conversationmog person 2, as the way they ask, listen and try to understand on their own terms is more engaging and socially calibrated than person 1 answering like an automaton without any gesticulation, dramatic pause, shift of tone, etc.

 

[Napoleon1800]

You're saying this like Chad knows any more than subhumans who gossip all day

No shit he does, chads are usually richer + smarter + more life experience

 

[Napoleon1800]

Simply having excess information about a large range of conversational topics does not give you the edge in a conversation. That edge comes from wit, charm and empathy. Let me give an example:

Person 1 (charming, witty, empathic, unknowing) has a conversation with person 2 (non-charming, dry, less empathic, knowing). In that case, person 1 will conversationmog person 2, as the way they ask, listen and try to understand on their own terms is more engaging and socially calibrated than person 1 answering like an automation without any gesticulation, dramatic pause, shift of tone, etc.

I’ll be honest subhumans geniunely sound like monkey retards or are high iq autists talking about complex topics like coding or money which is nice

Normies talking physically makes me cringe it’s all degenerate low iq surface level convos about sex, music, sports, drugs, teasing etc i fucking hate it so much

Chads tbh I don’t fucking know what they talk about, but they always seem so happy and smooth and smart and it all seems to be perfect and fit into place like clockwork

 

[irrumator praetor]

Simply having excess information about a large range of conversational topics does not give you the edge in a conversation

Ok yes it absolutely does because conversations flow from topic to topic. Being able to lead from a topic to another is considered social skill. Talking is literally about seeing what some other person is about. Like taking a look around in their head. If you're able to keep a convo for longer, you're more skilled, thus higher status

That edge comes from wit, charm and empathy.

Religious words that are attributed to chad because of the reasons I stated. What is wit? What I stated. Charm? Social IQ, comes from the capital of experiences. Empathy, same.

person 2

usually incel. Usually

 

[Restitutor Orbis]

Ok yes it absolutely does because conversations flow from topic to topic. Being able to lead from a topic to another is considered social skill. Talking is literally about seeing what some other person is about. Like taking a look around in their head. If you're able to keep a convo for longer, you're more skilled, thus higher status

Not saying that it doesn't matter, but chad can lead a convo to any sorta shallow retard topic he likes and will still come off as witty and smart because of the way he communicates, not because of what he communicates.

Religious words that are attributed to chad because of the reasons I stated. What is wit? What I stated. Charm? Social IQ, comes from the capital of experiences. Empathy, same.

Fair point.

 

[irrumator praetor]

Not saying that it doesn't matter, but chad can lead a convo to any sorta shallow retard topic he likes and will still come off as witty and smart because of the way he communicates, not because of what he communicates

Thats only the additional halo effect, yes chad can get away with socially being a retard and maybe starting on a stupid topic

 

[islamiczionist]

Nga thinks Mr beast is some all knowing lord-

 

[irrumator praetor]

Nga thinks Mr beast is some all knowing lord-

yes he actually is, btw he is literally a Lord because he hires so many people and undertakes crazy productions. So much money passes through his operations that I bet he contributes more to the economy and exchange of money, goods and services than a bunch of smaller businesses. Hes also 6ft3 blue eyes good jaw chad. Nothing is accidental

 

[irrumator praetor]

Nga thinks Mr beast is some all knowing lord-

compared to the normie he is literally a high iq alien

 

[irrumator praetor]

Nga thinks Mr beast is some all knowing lord-

like if he spent 24h of his invaluable time with a normie (human equivalent to a cockroach or ant) he would absolutely waste it, and a lot of money would actually be lost because he wasted that time with a normie. Also, you'd have to lock him in a room to do this, because he is aware of this as well. He would also be bored to bits. Theres not a single conversation normie can have with MrBeast that would infatuate him. Not a single convo mr beast could find interesting, something he would want to partake in

 

[mewzilla]

I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog (I define this as a relative measure between men; One man can convomog another if he has better quality topics to talk about assuming they're able to connect ofc) I will give an example:

Relative chad talks to relative subhuman: subhuman wants to connect cuz hes mogged, chad is able to lead the convo and successfully socialmax with the subhuman and have an amazing conversation. For the entire duration, chad is easily overlooking the subhuman from a higher point of "knowledge", he convomogs the subhuman. As in, the only thing they can connect about, chad knows enough or more about the topics than the subhuman, because the chads set of experiences is richer than that of the subhuman. So the subhuman is limited by life in a sense, while chad talks with the subhuman on a topic the subhuman considers on his level and novel/interesting/worth talking about, chad looks down onto this and considers it an inferior topic (but for the hypothetical, he entertains the subhuman for a time being).

I also noticed if Im way too mogged out of existence, not only am I not able to conversationally connect with the Chad, but even if I could, it would be on something he considers boring or inferior (inverse of the last example). Such mogger deities are essentially untouchable socially and status wise. Think about it: if hes multi millionaire model, theres absolutely no way to RELATE to him. Socialmaxxing is based on each other's RELATIVE life positions. If you could talk to Mr Beast for a whole day, theres nothing you could tell him what he doesn't already know, thats relevant or important anyway. He is a deity compared to you. You two can't even equally communicate. Like, hes in the stratosphere and you're in Mariana trench.

Yep thats all for the thread. How to socialmax with chad and convo mog chad? Just be chad or mog chad. Be richer than chad, be born better. Theres some successful people you might want to be able to connect with, but you simply are not on their level. People subconsciously notice this. You can easily be chad among subhumans, and a subhuman amongst chads. This sounds water but when applied to legit social skills and game its important to know. Consider the thread as a reminder at least.

"I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog"
LEAST NT SENTENCE OF ALL TIME

 

[irrumator praetor]

"I noticed that I can easily socialmax with people I convomog"
LEAST NT SENTENCE OF ALL TIME

young nigga hussling amongst the normies bru, im 2020 og