How To Fix FWHR When

[randomvanish]

you have no need for bimax. my mandible and maxilla is not recessed but i have a fwhr of 1,8 .


how can i fix this?

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

ZSO/Cheekbone implants but might fuck up ES ratio

 

[LastHopeForNorman]

you have good fwhr

fwhr is failo only when too low
ie 1.8>

 

[Deleted member 5786]

Fwhr is cope

 

[Deleted member 10615]

180 is fine, it gets an issue at below 170

 

[Biiyo03]

180 is fine, it gets an issue at below 170

when is it considered narrow

below 170?

i have 1.75-1.8 i think

 

[Biiyo03]

1.8-1.83, is fine bro chill tf out

6 pslers and above are usually 1.9 but theres a lot of people who have less and 6 psl or more

 

[Deleted member 10615]

when is it considered narrow

below 170?

i have 1.75-1.8 i think

very slightly below


Across participants, the average fWHR was 1.73 (SD = 0.16) for females and 1.83 (SD = 0.17) for males.


but ive seen studies saying the average is lower so idk


fwhr is cope anyway i have 190 and still rotting

 

[Biiyo03]

very slightly below


Across participants, the average fWHR was 1.73 (SD = 0.16) for females and 1.83 (SD = 0.17) for males.


but ive seen studies saying the average is lower so idk


fwhr is cope anyway i have 190 and still rotting

is ur avi u ?

 

[Deleted member 10615]

is ur avi u ?

yes

 

[Biiyo03]

yes

5 psl fix ur shit fucking skin though

 

[one job away]

you have no need for bimax. my mandible and maxilla is not recessed but i have a fwhr of 1,8 .


how can i fix this?

Tie the rope around your Midface section instead of you neck and then take a deep dive

 

[randomvanish]

ZSO/Cheekbone implants but might fuck up ES ratio

i got 0,43 es ratio, so i can get a zygo implant without fucking up harmony i guess

 

[StrangerDanger]

i got 0,43 es ratio, so i can get a zygo implant without fucking up harmony i guess

0.43 is too low, you already have close set eyes
it would be risky

 

[randomvanish]

0.43 is too low, you already have close set eyes
it would be risky

my ipd is 66mm

 

[StrangerDanger]

my ipd is 66mm

you have a 153mm skull? it's very wide
ES ratio is more important than FWHR
then the problem is high set brows or long midface

 

[randomvanish]

you have a 153mm skull? it's very wide
ES ratio is more important than FWHR
then the problem is high set brows or long midface

yeah but it's not about the skull right? my bizygomatic distance is 134mm but skull is wider. so i have lack of zygomatic prominence i guess

 

[randomvanish]

you have a 153mm skull? it's very wide
ES ratio is more important than FWHR
then the problem is high set brows or long midface

i don't have high set eyebrows it's middle set at worst

 

[randomvanish]

you have a 153mm skull? it's very wide
ES ratio is more important than FWHR
then the problem is high set brows or long midface

my midface ratio is 1.01

 

[randomvanish]

0.43 is too low, you already have close set eyes
it would be risky

ohh by measuring my es ratio is 66 / 134 = 0,49

but with photoshop i calculated different. probably because i have narrow bizygo distance while i have wider skull right?

 

[randomvanish]

think like this guy. this guy has giant zygos harmonic with his skull while i have good skull width without any good zygo width i guess

 

[StrangerDanger]

ohh by measuring my es ratio is 66 / 134 = 0,49

but with photoshop i calculated different. probably because i have narrow bizygo distance while i have wider skull right?

what do you mean your skull is wider than bizygo
are you measuring behind your ears
bizygo should be your face width

 

[StrangerDanger]

think like this guy. this guy has giant zygos harmonic with his skull while i have good skull width without any good zygo width i guess

just measure the widest distance of the face (not behind ears)

 

[randomvanish]

what do you mean your skull is wider than bizygo
are you measuring behind your ears
bizygo should be your face width

i don't have calipher right now by squeezing my head between door and wall like this

LOL

i have 134 mm bizygomatic distance and i have 66 mm ipd.

but with photoshop es ratio is 0,43. i don't know how.

 

[StrangerDanger]

i don't have calipher right now by squeezing my head between door and wall like this
View attachment 1345082 LOL

i have 134 mm bizygomatic distance and i have 66 mm ipd.

but with photoshop es ratio is 0,43. i don't know how.

are you sure your ipd is 66mm

 

[randomvanish]

are you sure your ipd is 66mm

yes it's really easy to measure.

 

[StrangerDanger]

yes it's really easy to measure.

somethings wrong

 

[Lorsss]

FWHR is a useless ratio.
what really matters is midface ratio

 

[randomvanish]

FWHR is a useless ratio.
what really matters is midface ratio

how come? i got 1.01 midface but fwhr around 1,83~

 

[randomvanish]

FWHR is a useless ratio.
what really matters is midface ratio

all the chads that i can mimic have 2~2,05 fwhr

 

[randomvanish]

somethings wrong

i need a calipher i guess to calculate my fwhr but , basically i need a 141~144 bizygo distance for the best es ratio right? since my ipd is 66

 

[StrangerDanger]

i need a calipher i guess to calculate my fwhr but , basically i need a 141~144 bizygo distance for the best es ratio right? since my ipd is 66

yeah 141-142 would be ideal

 

[randomvanish]

yeah 141-142 would be ideal

just measured johnny depp and he probably has 145~148mm zygo along with 64mm ipd.

so es ratio around 0,43

 

[StrangerDanger]

just measured johnny depp and he probably has 145~148mm zygo along with 64mm ipd.

so es ratio around 0,43

How did you get those measurements? Id guess around 140 maybe lower
Pitt is 140 for reference

 

[randomvanish]

How did you get those measurements? Id guess around 140 maybe lower
Pitt is 140 for reference
View attachment 1345139

by calculating iris size. iris is 11,7 for majority of the people,

check this out

The Iris CAN Be Used To MEASURE THE FACE CONFIRMED

A study conducted in 2016 involving 1000 Brazilians ranging from 6 to 22 found that the human iris was consistently useful for conducting facial measurements https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180330&type=printable The images selected follow the EXACT...

lookism.net

 

[randomvanish]

How did you get those measurements? Id guess around 140 maybe lower
Pitt is 140 for reference
View attachment 1345139

MEASURING YOUR FAVOURITE FACES FROM A PICTURE BREAKDOWN

Yeah, it's possible. I have been working on the way to do it for a few months now, and while I'm not the first person to attempt it (I actually did find a study done where they succeeded in measuring faces from a picture) I am the first person to take it as far as I have. The details of the...

lookism.net

 

[Deleted member 9670]

very slightly below


Across participants, the average fWHR was 1.73 (SD = 0.16) for females and 1.83 (SD = 0.17) for males.


but ive seen studies saying the average is lower so idk


fwhr is cope anyway i have 190 and still rotting

is that measured from the midpoint of eyebrows or upper eyelids?

 

[Deleted member 10615]

is that measured from the midpoint of eyebrows or upper eyelids?

im not sure

 

[StrangerDanger]

by calculating iris size. iris is 11,7 for majority of the people,

check this out

The Iris CAN Be Used To MEASURE THE FACE CONFIRMED

A study conducted in 2016 involving 1000 Brazilians ranging from 6 to 22 found that the human iris was consistently useful for conducting facial measurements https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180330&type=printable The images selected follow the EXACT...

lookism.net

But wtf is happening on these pictures

Id say 138-140 cause looks like it relative to Pitt who that guy has already taken measurements of

 

[randomvanish]

View attachment 1345141View attachment 1345142View attachment 1345144View attachment 1345149View attachment 1345152
But wtf is happening on these pictures
View attachment 1345153View attachment 1345146
Id say 138-140 cause looks like it relative to Pitt who that guy has already taken measurements of

damnn what's my problem ? i calculate my face and depp's somehow too much.

isn't it like this ?

if iris (11.77) is 347 pixels and bizygomatic distance is 4250

then bizygo distance must be 144 mm


right?

 

[StrangerDanger]

damnn what's my problem ? i calculate my face and depp's somehow too much.

isn't it like this ?
View attachment 1345155


if iris (11.77) is 347 w
then zygo must be 144 mm


right?

Yes thats what I did
Try these

and

 

[randomvanish]

View attachment 1345156

this one i found 137,5

 

[randomvanish]

this one i found 137,5

however that one is not a good pic to find out i guess due to head tilt

 

[randomvanish]

this one is 146mm

 

[Deleted member 9670]

increasing fwhr would make your es ratio worse

 

[randomvanish]

increasing fwhr would make your es ratio worse

yeah but thankfully my ipd can handle that, around 66mm

 

[Deleted member 9670]

yeah but thankfully my ipd can handle that, around 66mm

you could get mse, zygo implants

 

[randomvanish]

you could get mse, zygo implants

my imw is 45 and its u shape but i think my smile look kinda retarded, narrow.

i might need mse but i cannot spend a year with braces and my nose is 41mm , it would get wider

so, i'll get zygo implants

 

[dakchuh]

my ipd is 66mm

same. i have 66mm IPD, 0.415 ES, but 0.9 midface. my skull width and height are proportional with each other but not to my eyes

 

[JosephGarrot123]

fwhr is cope to a certain extent. my face is too wide that i need bone reduction