HOW TO GROW YOUR "BONES" WAY FASTER THAN BONESMASHING USING FIBROSIS

[prettyboypill]

fast low effort thread cause iam dumb and lazy, but i bet that u gon love it

Why Facial Bone “Growth” From Impact Is Almost Always Fibrosis — Not Real Bone Change​

I’ve been digging into the biomechanics behind facial changes from impacts, pressure, or “bonesmashing,” and I think a lot of people in these communities misunderstand what’s actually happening.


TL;DR: Most visible changes are fibrosis, not periosteal bone growth.


Here’s why:

1. Bone modeling in adults is extremely limited​

After puberty, periosteal modeling slows down drastically.
Even under ideal mechanical and hormonal conditions, the max real bone gain is something like:

• 0.1–2 mm per YEAR

And that’s with controlled, low-force, high-frequency mechanical loading — not random impacts.

2. Impacts don’t stimulate bone — they stimulate fibroblasts​

When you hit your face, you’re not giving the bone a clean mechanical strain signal.
You’re creating:

• micro-hematomas
• low-grade inflammation
• TGF-β release
• fibroblast → myofibroblast conversion
• collagen deposition (scar-like tissue)

This creates fibrosis, which is thick, firm, and feels “bony” to the touch — but it’s not bone.

3. Fibrosis changes your look WAY more than bone ever could​

This is the part people underestimate.


Fibrosis can add:

• 3–10 mm of thickness
• in just months
• visually widening cheekbones, jawline, temples, etc.

Meanwhile bone growth is:

• extremely slow
• extremely small
• barely visible without imaging

This is why fighters, boxers, and martial artists often look like their bones grew — in reality it’s thickened, fibrotic soft tissue over the bone.

4. Fibrosis is why changes from “impact techniques” happen so fast​

Real bone would never grow 3–5 mm in a few months.
Fibrosis can.
And it’s permanent-ish.


So if someone sees quick changes from impact, pressure, chewing devices, whatever — it’s almost certainly connective-tissue thickening, not osteoblast activity.

5. This isn’t necessarily “good” or “bad” — just reality​

Fibrosis can make the face look:

• harder
• wider
• more angular

But it can also become:

• uneven
• lumpy
• chronically inflamed
• stiff

It’s not a controlled process like bone modeling; it’s a scar-response.

btw this is just corrected by gpt but its my idea

 

[acm]

CHATJEWPEETEE

so, how do we get said "fibrosis"

 

[Grievous]

Bro can this shit site load I can't send me DNR and shit thread sticker

 

[the foid stalker]

 

[h76]

fast low effort thread cause iam dumb and lazy, but i bet that u gon love it

Why Facial Bone “Growth” From Impact Is Almost Always Fibrosis — Not Real Bone Change​

I’ve been digging into the biomechanics behind facial changes from impacts, pressure, or “bonesmashing,” and I think a lot of people in these communities misunderstand what’s actually happening.


TL;DR: Most visible changes are fibrosis, not periosteal bone growth.


Here’s why:

1. Bone modeling in adults is extremely limited​

After puberty, periosteal modeling slows down drastically.
Even under ideal mechanical and hormonal conditions, the max real bone gain is something like:

• 0.1–2 mm per YEAR

And that’s with controlled, low-force, high-frequency mechanical loading — not random impacts.

2. Impacts don’t stimulate bone — they stimulate fibroblasts​

When you hit your face, you’re not giving the bone a clean mechanical strain signal.
You’re creating:

• micro-hematomas
• low-grade inflammation
• TGF-β release
• fibroblast → myofibroblast conversion
• collagen deposition (scar-like tissue)

This creates fibrosis, which is thick, firm, and feels “bony” to the touch — but it’s not bone.

3. Fibrosis changes your look WAY more than bone ever could​

This is the part people underestimate.


Fibrosis can add:

• 3–10 mm of thickness
• in just months
• visually widening cheekbones, jawline, temples, etc.

Meanwhile bone growth is:

• extremely slow
• extremely small
• barely visible without imaging

This is why fighters, boxers, and martial artists often look like their bones grew — in reality it’s thickened, fibrotic soft tissue over the bone.

4. Fibrosis is why changes from “impact techniques” happen so fast​

Real bone would never grow 3–5 mm in a few months.
Fibrosis can.
And it’s permanent-ish.


So if someone sees quick changes from impact, pressure, chewing devices, whatever — it’s almost certainly connective-tissue thickening, not osteoblast activity.

5. This isn’t necessarily “good” or “bad” — just reality​

Fibrosis can make the face look:

• harder
• wider
• more angular

But it can also become:

• uneven
• lumpy
• chronically inflamed
• stiff

It’s not a controlled process like bone modeling; it’s a scar-response.

btw this is just corrected by gpt but its my idea

Well formatted thread lil bro u deserve a bump

 

[prettyboypill]

CHATJEWPEETEE

idk how to write in english properly+ if i would write this would just be an sentence lmao
but gpt or not its an good and new idea isnt?

 

[acm]

idk how to write in english properly+ if i would write this would just be an sentence lmao
but gpt or not its an good and new idea isnt?

I will take your idea into consideration

 

[prettyboypill]

Well formatted thread lil bro u deserve a bump

mfs care more abt how it was writted than the idea itself

 

[prettyboypill]

CHATJEWPEETEE

so, how do we get said "fibrosis"

ruin your face with that hammer, mostly bonesmashing gains are by that btw, its caused by inflammation and collagen deposis

 

[HundredManSlayer]

androgenic was talking about this with bonesmashing

everybody says bonesmashing is cope and doesn't work, but when i tried it and tried it inconsistently at that my zygos got bigger and more projected. like within a few weeks.

cope for bone growth yeah, but there 100 percent is something getting added there

 

[looks>books]

S

fast low effort thread cause iam dumb and lazy, but i bet that u gon love it

Why Facial Bone “Growth” From Impact Is Almost Always Fibrosis — Not Real Bone Change​

I’ve been digging into the biomechanics behind facial changes from impacts, pressure, or “bonesmashing,” and I think a lot of people in these communities misunderstand what’s actually happening.


TL;DR: Most visible changes are fibrosis, not periosteal bone growth.


Here’s why:

1. Bone modeling in adults is extremely limited​

After puberty, periosteal modeling slows down drastically.
Even under ideal mechanical and hormonal conditions, the max real bone gain is something like:

• 0.1–2 mm per YEAR

And that’s with controlled, low-force, high-frequency mechanical loading — not random impacts.

2. Impacts don’t stimulate bone — they stimulate fibroblasts​

When you hit your face, you’re not giving the bone a clean mechanical strain signal.
You’re creating:

• micro-hematomas
• low-grade inflammation
• TGF-β release
• fibroblast → myofibroblast conversion
• collagen deposition (scar-like tissue)

This creates fibrosis, which is thick, firm, and feels “bony” to the touch — but it’s not bone.

3. Fibrosis changes your look WAY more than bone ever could​

This is the part people underestimate.


Fibrosis can add:

• 3–10 mm of thickness
• in just months
• visually widening cheekbones, jawline, temples, etc.

Meanwhile bone growth is:

• extremely slow
• extremely small
• barely visible without imaging

This is why fighters, boxers, and martial artists often look like their bones grew — in reality it’s thickened, fibrotic soft tissue over the bone.

4. Fibrosis is why changes from “impact techniques” happen so fast​

Real bone would never grow 3–5 mm in a few months.
Fibrosis can.
And it’s permanent-ish.


So if someone sees quick changes from impact, pressure, chewing devices, whatever — it’s almost certainly connective-tissue thickening, not osteoblast activity.

5. This isn’t necessarily “good” or “bad” — just reality​

Fibrosis can make the face look:

• harder
• wider
• more angular

But it can also become:

• uneven
• lumpy
• chronically inflamed
• stiff

It’s not a controlled process like bone modeling; it’s a scar-response.

btw this is just corrected by gpt but its my idea

So what should i do? Keep hammer mashing?

 

[prettyboypill]

androgenic was talking about this with bonesmashing

everybody says bonesmashing is cope and doesn't work, but when i tried it and tried it inconsistently at that my zygos got bigger and more projected. like within a few weeks.

cope for bone growth yeah, but there 100 percent is something getting added there

people want bones but bone growth is infinity slower than soft tissues (even on perfect bone modeling (that cant be caused by impact)) at best u can get milimeters in years

 

[prettyboypill]

y

S

So what should i do? Keep hammer mashing?

ye but take care about losing bones by that

 

[looks>books]

y

ye but take care about losing bones by that

How like drink more milk?

 

[prettyboypill]

How like drink more milk?

JFL no ammout of milk can prevent u from negative ΔB

 

[dawooddX]

found an undiscovered method thats related wit bone stimulation hahaa. part of them ws fibrosis.

genuienly thank u for this infomration u have no idea how much it contributed to it.

good thread

 

[Etson]

androgenic was talking about this with bonesmashing

everybody says bonesmashing is cope and doesn't work, but when i tried it and tried it inconsistently at that my zygos got bigger and more projected. like within a few weeks.

cope for bone growth yeah, but there 100 percent is something getting added there

I believe someone said its tissue being added there. It's likely fibrous tissue, which adds a thin layer of bulk, it's not the actual bone growing, it's more like scar-tissue, it can add 1–3 mm of permanent projection in some cases.