how to know if i have a good bone structure for gymaxxing?

[ApolloAurius]

title. is it possible to observe this without an x-ray test?

 

[pizza]

stop overthinking about this and go gymcel

 

[Deleted member 11748]

its pretty simple:

big bones = less mass needed to look big

tiny waist and hips = good V taper

broad shoulders + big ribcage = massive upper body

good insertions = aesthethic

lose weight and c for yourself.

 

[ApolloAurius]

its pretty simple:

big bones = less mass needed to look big

tiny waist and hips + good V taper

broad shoulders + big ribcage = massive upper body

good insertions = aesthethic

lose weight and c for yourself.

good

 

[blckplldrtrd]

just go to the gym either way - do a linear strength program and eat well and i promise you will look significantly better in 6/12 months

 

[Stingray]

chances are you don’t have absolutely dogshit genetics. Go and workout if you can

 

[Htobrother]

its pretty simple:

big bones = more mass needed to look big

tiny waist and hips + good V taper

broad shoulders + big ribcage = massive upper body

good insertions = aesthethic

lose weight and c for yourself.

 

[Selinity]

It's more about muscle genetics and where your gym gains are going than anything.
Guy in the pic didn't have na impressive frame, but his muscle distribution is god-tier so he was able to ascend his frame with gymcelling.

 

[Gonthar]

Post photo of your shirtless body here, cut the face if you don't want us to see it, and we'll tell you about your potential. Also add some info about you like age, height, weight, etc.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

stop overthinking about this and go gymcel

 

[joseph]

title. is it possible to observe this without an x-ray test?





View attachment 1028416

wide scapula is what you need

 

[Deleted member 5052]

You don't need good bone structure for gymcelling. Muscles create size bones don't

 

[Mongrelcel]

You don't need good bone structure for gymcelling. Muscles create size bones don't

if you don have the bones you will never look big or aesthetic

 

[Deleted member 5052]

if you don have the bones you will never look big or aesthetic

Aesthetic maybe but not size. Khabib objectively has bigger bones probably 99th percentile tier still looks way smaller than david laid because of lower muscle mass

 

[Mongrelcel]

View attachment 1028498
View attachment 1028499

Aesthetic maybe but not size. Khabib objectively has bigger bones probably 99th percentile tier still looks way smaller than david laid because of lower muscle mass

but this is a perfect example of what im talking about

khabib is 5'10, has worse proportions, and biacronial width.

if he was put next to 6'2 laid he would look pretty bad aesthetically. not matter if he increased his muscle mass to the size of his
this is exactly what im talking about