How to prove that 2𝑥 − 1 is factor of a polynomial?

Deleted member 6191

Deleted member 6191

M*d
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Posts
6,360
Reputation
8,067
E.g. of something x^3 − something 𝑥^2 + 𝑥 − whatever number .

Does long division work in this situation or do i DO synthetic? Btw retarded so I forgot how to do synthetic division.

Then I have to factor the e.g. x^3 − something 𝑥^2 + 𝑥 − whatever number.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sytyl, thecel and Zygos4Life
Did you try looking up your own asshole? That's where the answer is.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: sytyl, Kingcel32 and buckchadley31
Did you try looking up your own asshole? That's where the answer is.
rightfulcel

Sorry rules say no homosexual activity, cannot do that.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
1594567484132
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Does long division work
No. You need synthetic


You could also check what the solution to the 2x-1 is like 0.5 and this case and test if this is also a solution to the other polynomial.

This method only works to exclude the 2x-1 not to prove it because also the factor 4x-2 could be the real factor of the polynomial

@Dukeys
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 6191
Proofs are gay tbh
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5522 and Deleted member 6191
ah, you're 16. that explains it.
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: AbandonShip and Deleted member 6191
  • +1
Reactions: Zygos4Life
You can't factor a first order polynomial.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
You can't factor a first order polynomial.
Confused, it's asking "Prove that 2𝑥 − 1 is a factor of xyz" the e.g. was just a random thing. so like when given 𝑓(𝑥) prove that 2x-1 is a factor of xyz
 
  • +1
Reactions: SpearOfOrion
Confused, it's asking "Prove that 2𝑥 − 1 is a factor of xyz" the e.g. was just a random thing.
ah sorry, didnt get your question. Yes you can long division xyz by 2x-1, or use ruffini's rule. If the remainder is 0 you're good
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
ah sorry, didnt get your question. Yes you can long division xyz by 2x-1, or use ruffini's rule. If the remainder is 0 you're good
thats alr, so u mean f(x)= 2𝑥^3 − 13𝑥^2 + 24𝑥 − 9 or something would work? by example w long div. also whats ruffinis rule lol
 
E.g. of something x^3 − something 𝑥^2 + 𝑥 − whatever number .

Does long division work in this situation or do i DO synthetic? Btw retarded so I forgot how to do synthetic division.

Then I have to factor the e.g. x^3 − something 𝑥^2 + 𝑥 − whatever number.
You can just factor out the x in x^2+x

Alternatively, you need to use descarte rule of signs+ synth division for more complex functions to find the root.

But since you are online you can just graph to find the 0s with Desmos or w/e
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
You can just factor out the x in x^2+x

Alternatively, you need to use descarte rule of signs+ synth division for more complex functions to find the root.

But since you are online you can just graph to find the 0s with Desmos or w/e
I have to prove through the process of calculations. Like u said with synbth dividison. I have to review it lol. I'll check with desmos
 
No. You need synthetic


You could also check what the solution to the 2x-1 is like 0.5 and this case and test if this is also a solution to the other polynomial.

This method only works to exclude the 2x-1 not to prove it because also the factor 4x-2 could be the real factor of the polynomial

@Dukeys
Just saw what u wrote instead. I'll try this out as well thanks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5891
Bro you in high school?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
OK. Just don't choose a dificult ass course in you go to college, that math ain't nothing compared to what you will encounter in the future, in case you decide to.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
I have to prove through the process of calculations. Like u said with synbth dividison. I have to review it lol. I'll check with desmos
Yea make sure to use ros to guess better
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6191
OK. Just don't choose a dificult ass course in you go to college, that math ain't nothing compared to what you will encounter in the future, in case you decide to.
Lol, it's not hard I've just been lazy recently + it's an online course.
Gonna go into mech or civil engineering since for some reason physics a bit more doable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Timelessbrah

Similar threads

PrinceLuenLeoncur
Discussion @buddahisking
Replies
14
Views
63
buddhistking
buddhistking
ivantheterrible
Replies
18
Views
181
uniclassguy
U
gymcel64
Replies
19
Views
189
quantitativePSL
quantitativePSL
PSL DEMON
Replies
25
Views
240
PSL DEMON
PSL DEMON

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top