Dastan
It's never over.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2022
- Posts
- 825
- Reputation
- 752
Depends on your facial features:
- If you got a set of wide jaw, high fwhr, long chin height, compact midface with short nose, thick upper lip and not so great eye area:
Take pics from a slightly upside angle (higher than your head). This is angle is beneficial with this set of facial features cos upward photo angle increases your not so great eye area attractiveness = higher perceived CT, less UEE and straighter upper and lower eyelids, while also reducing your perceived facial width (and jaw width), chin height and upper lip thickness, while increasing the appearance of longer looking midface and nose with more downturned looking nose tip, but that's fine, cos these facial features are already good enough to withstand it.
- If you got a set of long midface with long nose, low fwhr and jaw width with short chin height and thin upper lip but good eye area:
Take pics from a slightly downward angle (lower than your head). This is angle is beneficial with this set of facial features cos downward photo angle increases your perceived chin height, facial width (and jaw width) and upper lip height and reduces the appearance of your midface and nose length, increasing the appearance of more upturned nose tip, while also not reducing your perceived eye area attractiveness that much cos you already have a high CT, no UEE and likely straight looking upper and lower eyelids.
What to do if you have a mix of the mentioned facial features that don't fit into those categories well:
- Figure out which category your particular facial features fit into more based on how "good" or "bad" your features from the mentioned for each category (= how important is it for you to cover the "bad" ones and how much the "good" ones can withstand without turning into negative features) to select the according approach (upward or downward angle) to balance out your personal set of facial features.
Examples:
- Vinnie Hacker has a wide jaw, average fwhr, long chin height and long midface with long nose and not so great eye area parameters, so in total he still clearly looks better from a downward angle (as he is prob aware of this method, it's hard to find any pics of him from an upward angle):
vs
(lmao)
- Brad Pitt has wide jaw, high fwhr and compact midface, while his eye area is also pretty good and his chin height is alright too, but even tho his facial features are quite balanced he still slightly benefits from an upward angle:
vs
This thread was inspired by the recent question of @IBlameHoax
- If you got a set of wide jaw, high fwhr, long chin height, compact midface with short nose, thick upper lip and not so great eye area:
Take pics from a slightly upside angle (higher than your head). This is angle is beneficial with this set of facial features cos upward photo angle increases your not so great eye area attractiveness = higher perceived CT, less UEE and straighter upper and lower eyelids, while also reducing your perceived facial width (and jaw width), chin height and upper lip thickness, while increasing the appearance of longer looking midface and nose with more downturned looking nose tip, but that's fine, cos these facial features are already good enough to withstand it.
- If you got a set of long midface with long nose, low fwhr and jaw width with short chin height and thin upper lip but good eye area:
Take pics from a slightly downward angle (lower than your head). This is angle is beneficial with this set of facial features cos downward photo angle increases your perceived chin height, facial width (and jaw width) and upper lip height and reduces the appearance of your midface and nose length, increasing the appearance of more upturned nose tip, while also not reducing your perceived eye area attractiveness that much cos you already have a high CT, no UEE and likely straight looking upper and lower eyelids.
What to do if you have a mix of the mentioned facial features that don't fit into those categories well:
- Figure out which category your particular facial features fit into more based on how "good" or "bad" your features from the mentioned for each category (= how important is it for you to cover the "bad" ones and how much the "good" ones can withstand without turning into negative features) to select the according approach (upward or downward angle) to balance out your personal set of facial features.
Examples:
- Vinnie Hacker has a wide jaw, average fwhr, long chin height and long midface with long nose and not so great eye area parameters, so in total he still clearly looks better from a downward angle (as he is prob aware of this method, it's hard to find any pics of him from an upward angle):
- Brad Pitt has wide jaw, high fwhr and compact midface, while his eye area is also pretty good and his chin height is alright too, but even tho his facial features are quite balanced he still slightly benefits from an upward angle:
This thread was inspired by the recent question of @IBlameHoax
Last edited:
