How to win any religious argument

[Deleted member 67738]

First have one of these as your avi/pfp

Spoiler

van gogh would be best option

Then in your written response to said argument
Copy some shit from google and add sum smart words like “precisely” or “indeed”

Finally add some old relic photo from some tribe In the deep jungle like this





@2025cel @JeanneDArcAlter @LTNUser @134applesauce456 @R1PPer

 

[Deleted member 117288]

200IQ guide ngl

 

[superpsycho]

probably more effective than actually forming a solid argument

 

[Deleted member 67738]

200IQ guide ngl

The one and only @RXnd rn :

 

[LTNUser]

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @buddhistking @Nimrod

 

[Deleted member 117288]

The one and only @RXnd rn :

What did he do, I'm ngl, kinda confused?

 

[Deleted member 67738]

What did he do, I'm ngl, kinda confused?

He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.

@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser

 

[Deleted member 117288]

He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.

@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser

Brutal

 

[Deleted member 131328]

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @buddhistking @Nimrod

My avi is dellisola dude and i get my info from schizo facebook groups, reels, documentaries from bitchute rumble youtube and articles from conspiracy sites

 

[Deleted member 117288]

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @buddhistking @Nimrod

Buddhistking is agnostic.

 

[buddhistking]

Buddhistking is agnostic.

Exactly they don't get that Buddhism is not like Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Hinduism and I don't worship any God nor believe that any God is real, I am agnostic pure as in I don't know either way

 

[Raja Porus]

Indeed

Why atheism today? God “the Father” has been thoroughly refuted; and so has “the Judge” and “the Reward-giver.” The same for God’s “free will”: he doesn’t listen, – and even if he did, he wouldn’t know how to help anyway. The worst part of it is: he seems unable to communicate in an intelligible manner: is he unclear ?

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Thoughts? @PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[Raja Porus]

Thoughts? @PrinceLuenLeoncur

Indeed

1×1×1 = 1 , not 1+1+1=1

Trinity is true

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Indeed

1×1×1 = 1 , not 1+1+1=1

Trinity is true

View attachment 3534895

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

My avi is dellisola dude and i get my info from schizo facebook groups, reels, documentaries from bitchute rumble youtube and articles from conspiracy sites

Nah he’s wrong. You need to mention philosophy use big words that normies don’t understand assert your dominance using this then you’ll win

 

[Aypo129]

He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.

@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser

I have never debated a religious person before
But what's the point of debating a religious person at all
Trying to make him give up his views
WHy

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Indeed

1×1×1 = 1 , not 1+1+1=1

Trinity is true

View attachment 3534895

Honestly it’s a cringe Muslim argument tbh because they don’t even understand the basics of counting by division vs by identity. It’s their own ignorance in this subject that causes them to do what @JeanneDArcAlter did.

Like if you have one piece do paper and rip it into 3 so you have 3 new paper? No you have one paper ripped into 3. Simple ass shit, but Islam is for low IQs

 

[Deleted member 131328]

Nah he’s wrong. You need to mention philosophy use big words that normies don’t understand assert your dominance using this then you’ll win

Just say you're stupid already

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Honestly it’s a cringe Muslim argument tbh because they don’t even understand the basics of counting by division vs by identity. It’s their own ignorance in this subject that causes them to do what @JeanneDArcAlter did.

Like if you have one piece do paper and rip it into 3 so you have 3 new paper? No you have one paper ripped into 3. Simple ass shit, but Islam is for low IQs

Do your ripped paper pieces individually have the same value as the whole paper?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Do you ripped paper pieces individually have the same value as the whole paper?

Yes because the ripped pieces of paper have the same ontological status and thus are of the same essense. But Muslims because their inbred brains don’t work they will say “Akhiiiiii it’s 3 new pieces of paper completely unrelated allahu ackbar “

This is why I can’t take Mohammedens srs

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Yes because the ripped pieces of paper have the same ontological status and thus are of the same essense. But Muslims because their inbred brains don’t work they will say “Akhiiiiii it’s 3 new pieces of paper completely unrelated allahu ackbar “

This is why I can’t take Mohammedens srs

Drawing a parallel to how 3 infinities are as large as one infinity I believe
But some infinities are bigger than each other so your point is moot albeit I'm not sure whether that thing is for additions of the same infinity or just different sets of certain categories of numbers

 

[160cmcurry]

no counter to nihilism

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Drawing a parallel to how 3 infinities are as large as one infinity I believe
But some infinities are bigger than each other so your point is moot

Does your brain work?

It’s about categories vs identity

The grouping the category of god remains due to the essense being the same ontologically and indivisible. The distinction counting by identity exists in 2nd order imposition where you count the persons based on their distinctions in this case 3 paper pieces cos they are distinct.

Learn philosophy and then come back to me before you chat shit like all other brain dead zpisslamists. And then Mohammedens wonder why I have 0 respect for their gay retarded cult

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

The grouping the category of god remains due to the essense being the same ontologically and indivisible.

I'll say it again
The categories draw parallels with infinity
As in that they're indivisble and identical
When you divide an infinity by 3 the 3 infinities are smaller than the initial infinity despite being indivisible and identical
It's pretty easy and I don't believe immanent concepts get an exception from that although I could be wrong

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I'll say it again
The categories draw parallels with infinity
As in that they're indivisble and identical
When you divide an infinity by 3 the 3 infinities are smaller than the initial infinity despite being indivisible and identical
It's pretty easy and I don't believe immanent concepts get an exception from that although I could be wrong

Wow do you not get the point?


The three ripped pieces of paper are still “One” piece of paper for we are counting by the catagory of what it is based on first Oder imposition and division this is how people count today and in the past.

You’re just spouting word salad and infinity cannot be divided that’s why it’s “infinity”.
In everyday life, we often mix these approaches. For example, when counting the number of items a collection, we rely on clear identities. Yet when discussing the nature of a concept (like justice or beauty.

So a building can have multiple rooms by division but it’s still one building holistically unified as one despite having distinctions in its divisibility and identity of rooms. So you count gods divine nature by division as the wholeness of the Essense remains shared equally between the Hypostasis making ONE UNIFIED WHOLE however you count the Hypostasis based on identity as they exist in unique Modes.

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Wow do you not get the point?


The three ripped pieces of paper are still “One” piece of paper for we are counting by the catagory of what it is based on first Oder imposition and division this is how people count today and in the past.

You’re just spouting word salad and infinity cannot be divided that’s why it’s “infinity”.
In everyday life, we often mix these approaches. For example, when counting the number of items a collection, we rely on clear identities. Yet when discussing the nature of a concept (like justice or beauty.

So a building can have multiple rooms by division but it’s still one building holistically unified as one despite having distinctions in its divisibility and identity of rooms. So you count gods divine nature by division as the wholeness of the Essense remains shared equally between the Hypostasis making ONE UNIFIED WHOLE however you count the Hypostasis based on identity as they exist in unique Modes.

Your knowledgeable albeit not intelligent