How to win any religious argument

itzyaboyJJ

itzyaboyJJ

That shiet peak yo
Joined
Mar 27, 2024
Posts
13,393
Reputation
36,970
First have one of these as your avi/pfp
IMG 8351
IMG 8310 IMG 8093
van gogh would be best option

Then in your written response to said argument
Copy some shit from google and add sum smart words like “precisely” or “indeed”

Finally add some old relic photo from some tribe In the deep jungle like this



IMG 8414

@2025cel @JeanneDArcAlter @LTNUser @134applesauce456 @R1PPer
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Stewart.Belgrade, Shrek2OnDvD, vernier and 14 others
200IQ guide ngl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, vernier, Aypo129 and 6 others
probably more effective than actually forming a solid argument
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Aypo129, JeanneDArcAlter and 4 others
@PrinceLuenLeoncur @buddhistking @Nimrod
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Stewart.Belgrade, Aypo129, R1PPer and 2 others
What did he do, I'm ngl, kinda confused?
He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.
:blackpill:
@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129, JeanneDArcAlter, LTNUser and 1 other person
He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.
:blackpill:
@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser
Brutal
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter, LTNUser and itzyaboyJJ
@PrinceLuenLeoncur @buddhistking @Nimrod
My avi is dellisola dude and i get my info from schizo facebook groups, reels, documentaries from bitchute rumble youtube and articles from conspiracy sites
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Raja Porus, Aypo129, 2025cel and 2 others
  • Woah
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter, itzyaboyJJ and LTNUser
Buddhistking is agnostic.
Exactly they don't get that Buddhism is not like Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Hinduism and I don't worship any God nor believe that any God is real, I am agnostic pure as in I don't know either way
 
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter, itzyaboyJJ and 2025cel
Indeed

Why atheism today? God “the Father” has been thoroughly refuted; and so has “the Judge” and “the Reward-giver.” The same for God’s “free will”: he doesn’t listen, – and even if he did, he wouldn’t know how to help anyway. The worst part of it is: he seems unable to communicate in an intelligible manner: is he unclear ?

1000024311
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Stewart.Belgrade, Bars, JeanneDArcAlter and 2 others
Thoughts? @PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Raja Porus, 2025cel and itzyaboyJJ
My avi is dellisola dude and i get my info from schizo facebook groups, reels, documentaries from bitchute rumble youtube and articles from conspiracy sites
Nah he’s wrong. You need to mention philosophy use big words that normies don’t understand assert your dominance using this then you’ll win
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ, Aypo129 and 2025cel
He’s mirin the thread bhai
Well I hope
He parted away from us after retiring as ur partner real talk yo.
:blackpill:
@SoverignJohnathon @Aypo129 @The Homelander @vitaminD @LTNUser
I have never debated a religious person before
But what's the point of debating a religious person at all
Trying to make him give up his views🤔
WHy 🤯
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and 2025cel
Indeed

1×1×1 = 1 , not 1+1+1=1

Trinity is true

View attachment 3534895
Honestly it’s a cringe Muslim argument tbh because they don’t even understand the basics of counting by division vs by identity. It’s their own ignorance in this subject that causes them to do what @JeanneDArcAlter did.

Like if you have one piece do paper and rip it into 3 so you have 3 new paper? No you have one paper ripped into 3. Simple ass shit, but Islam is for low IQs
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and 2025cel
Nah he’s wrong. You need to mention philosophy use big words that normies don’t understand assert your dominance using this then you’ll win
Just say you're stupid already
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and 2025cel
Honestly it’s a cringe Muslim argument tbh because they don’t even understand the basics of counting by division vs by identity. It’s their own ignorance in this subject that causes them to do what @JeanneDArcAlter did.

Like if you have one piece do paper and rip it into 3 so you have 3 new paper? No you have one paper ripped into 3. Simple ass shit, but Islam is for low IQs
Do your ripped paper pieces individually have the same value as the whole paper?
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Do you ripped paper pieces individually have the same value as the whole paper?
Yes because the ripped pieces of paper have the same ontological status and thus are of the same essense. But Muslims because their inbred brains don’t work they will say “Akhiiiiii it’s 3 new pieces of paper completely unrelated allahu ackbar :feelsuhh:

This is why I can’t take Mohammedens srs
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and JeanneDArcAlter
Yes because the ripped pieces of paper have the same ontological status and thus are of the same essense. But Muslims because their inbred brains don’t work they will say “Akhiiiiii it’s 3 new pieces of paper completely unrelated allahu ackbar :feelsuhh:

This is why I can’t take Mohammedens srs
Drawing a parallel to how 3 infinities are as large as one infinity I believe
But some infinities are bigger than each other so your point is moot albeit I'm not sure whether that thing is for additions of the same infinity or just different sets of certain categories of numbers
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
no counter to nihilism :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Drawing a parallel to how 3 infinities are as large as one infinity I believe
But some infinities are bigger than each other so your point is moot
Does your brain work?

It’s about categories vs identity

The grouping the category of god remains due to the essense being the same ontologically and indivisible. The distinction counting by identity exists in 2nd order imposition where you count the persons based on their distinctions in this case 3 paper pieces cos they are distinct.

Learn philosophy and then come back to me before you chat shit like all other brain dead zpisslamists. And then Mohammedens wonder why I have 0 respect for their gay retarded cult
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter, itzyaboyJJ and Nimrod
The grouping the category of god remains due to the essense being the same ontologically and indivisible.
I'll say it again
The categories draw parallels with infinity
As in that they're indivisble and identical
When you divide an infinity by 3 the 3 infinities are smaller than the initial infinity despite being indivisible and identical
It's pretty easy and I don't believe immanent concepts get an exception from that although I could be wrong
 
I'll say it again
The categories draw parallels with infinity
As in that they're indivisble and identical
When you divide an infinity by 3 the 3 infinities are smaller than the initial infinity despite being indivisible and identical
It's pretty easy and I don't believe immanent concepts get an exception from that although I could be wrong
Wow do you not get the point?


The three ripped pieces of paper are still “One” piece of paper for we are counting by the catagory of what it is based on first Oder imposition and division this is how people count today and in the past.

You’re just spouting word salad and infinity cannot be divided :lul: that’s why it’s “infinity”.
In everyday life, we often mix these approaches. For example, when counting the number of items a collection, we rely on clear identities. Yet when discussing the nature of a concept (like justice or beauty.

So a building can have multiple rooms by division but it’s still one building holistically unified as one despite having distinctions in its divisibility and identity of rooms. So you count gods divine nature by division as the wholeness of the Essense remains shared equally between the Hypostasis making ONE UNIFIED WHOLE however you count the Hypostasis based on identity as they exist in unique Modes.
 
Wow do you not get the point?


The three ripped pieces of paper are still “One” piece of paper for we are counting by the catagory of what it is based on first Oder imposition and division this is how people count today and in the past.

You’re just spouting word salad and infinity cannot be divided :lul: that’s why it’s “infinity”.
In everyday life, we often mix these approaches. For example, when counting the number of items a collection, we rely on clear identities. Yet when discussing the nature of a concept (like justice or beauty.

So a building can have multiple rooms by division but it’s still one building holistically unified as one despite having distinctions in its divisibility and identity of rooms. So you count gods divine nature by division as the wholeness of the Essense remains shared equally between the Hypostasis making ONE UNIFIED WHOLE however you count the Hypostasis based on identity as they exist in unique Modes.
Your knowledgeable albeit not intelligent
 

Similar threads

Rabbi
Replies
54
Views
711
PrinceLuenLeoncur
PrinceLuenLeoncur
Sloppyseconds
Replies
52
Views
8K
160cmcurry
160cmcurry
leF
Replies
37
Views
8K
mitsuki6643
mitsuki6643
BucketCrab
Replies
33
Views
5K
nonchalantcel
nonchalantcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top