Humans are carnivores

asdvek

asdvek

Nautica Malone
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Posts
61,040
Reputation
95,718
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: tkz3, Andremln, SplashJuice and 8 others
don't be a retard pls
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LaytonC, MiserableMan, mcmentalonthemic and 4 others
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
Jewish propaganda, ima eat goy slop nigga
 
THIS IS A JEWISH THREAD HES TRYING RO POISON US
 
  • +1
Reactions: Apchun144, piec and optimisticzoomer
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LTNUser, NatureRapist, piec and 1 other person
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
Guess the bite force of gorillas then log off
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, LTNUser, yussimania and 2 others
sheep in wolfs clothing, we should be eating plants instead of meat smh
 
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
why the fuck everyone can eat vegetables and fruits then, If we were truly carnivores we would not be able to digest fruits or vegetables.
 
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
even some normies know that, is it true what tyler1 say that u arent a real raw meat eater cuz u drink water instead of blood and sometimes even cook meat?
 
Human teeth can withstand 800lbs of force on it

Wolf teeth can stand 400lbs

We're more of a carnivore than wolves yet niggas say we're omnivore
Nitrogen isotope data gut morphology tastes cave painting everything proves we are carnivores
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: LTNUser and asdvek
 
F students have 1200 lbs of force
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, piec and asdvek
fallacy of cherry picking,
Atypical cases do not reinforce a rule.
Cases of "vegetarian" lions are not representative of their species.
Nope

It's 100% proof an obligate carnivore won't immediately starve to death

It lived 10 years there is no genetic variation that would make
it unapplicable to lions
 
i fucking love meat fuck vegetables disgusting green leaves
 
Nope

It's 100% proof an obligate carnivore won't immediately starve to death

It lived 10 years there is no genetic variation that would make
it unapplicable to lions
Surprising, but nevertheless, first, you cannot generalize all lions and say that ''they can survive without meat'', lions are obligate carnivores, logically they need nutrients that they would only find in meat, although Little Tyke survived without meat, that does not mean that exception to the rule is applicable to all lions, and you cannot compare the digestive system of a lion with a human.
 
2025 is the year when niggas say the coldest most blatantly common sense takes and niggas will still find a way to disagree
 
Surprising, but nevertheless, first, you cannot generalize all lions and say that ''they can survive without meat'', lions are obligate carnivores, logically they need nutrients that they would only find in meat, although Little Tyke survived without meat, that does not mean that exception to the rule is applicable to all lions, and you cannot compare the digestive system of a lion with a human.
Human stomach ph 1.5 lion 2.0

Human small intestine length 6m lion 6-7m

Human large intestine length 1.5m lion 1m

Yes it actually is applicable to all lions because he was had a normal lion body
 
  • +1
Reactions: asdvek
Why do we even need to eat grains
 
  • +1
Reactions: asdvek
Human stomach ph 1.5 lion 2.0

Human small intestine length 6m lion 6-7m

Human large intestine length 1.5m lion 1m

Yes it actually is applicable to all lions because he was had a normal lion body
Lions and humans share some digestive parameters, but that doesn't make them physiologically identical. Lions are obligate carnivores (short gut ratio, lack of plant digestive enzymes, and dependence on taurine), while humans are omnivores. Little Tyke's survival is a rare exception and anomaly, not a new biological rule.
 
Lions and humans share some digestive parameters, but that doesn't make them physiologically identical. Lions are obligate carnivores (short gut ratio, lack of plant digestive enzymes, and dependence on taurine), while humans are omnivores. Little Tyke's survival is a rare exception and anomaly, not a new biological rule.
Amylase wasnt selected against as theres no reason to

Gut ratio is an irrelevant cope we eat the same food as lions and have nearly identical lengths and more acid stomach acid

Little tyke is the only test

Just as humans would obviously lions would die in nature if eating plants mostly

Humans also need taurine just not as much as lions and cats
 
Amylase wasnt selected against as theres no reason to

Gut ratio is an irrelevant cope we eat the same food as lions and have nearly identical lengths and more acid stomach acid

Little tyke is the only test

Just as humans would obviously lions would die in nature if eating plants mostly

Humans also need taurine just not as much as lions and cats
You're mixing isolated facts with wrong conclusions.
Lions lack AMY1 and can't digest starches humans can.
Gut ratio isn't irrelevant: lions have 3-4× body length intestines, humans 8-10×.That's why we can digest fiber and they can't.
Lions have stronger stomach acid to process raw meat, not the other way around.
And yes, taurine is essential for them because they can't synthesize it - we can,
one lion surviving without meat doesn't overturn biology; that's an anecdote, not data.
 
You're mixing isolated facts with wrong conclusions.
Lions lack AMY1 and can't digest starches humans can.
Gut ratio isn't irrelevant: lions have 3-4× body length intestines, humans 8-10×.That's why we can digest fiber and they can't.
Lions have stronger stomach acid to process raw meat, not the other way around.
And yes, taurine is essential for them because they can't synthesize it - we can,
one lion surviving without meat doesn't overturn biology; that's an anecdote, not data.
Amylase isn't an evolution it's a trait we didn't select against

Explain why gut ratio matters when the raw length is the same and we eat the same foods

No we cant digest fiber lol

Nope humans have more acidic stomach

Humans cant synthesize infinite taurine

Explain which gene the lion had that made it survive
 
  • Woah
Reactions: LTNUser
Nitrogen isotope data gut morphology tastes cave painting everything proves we are carnivores
What's isotope data?
 
Amylase isn't an evolution it's a trait we didn't select against

Explain why gut ratio matters when the raw length is the same and we eat the same foods

No we cant digest fiber lol

Nope humans have more acidic stomach

Humans cant synthesize infinite taurine

Explain which gene the lion had that made it survive
1:Amylase is literally a textbook example of dietary evolution. Populations that ate more starch have more AMY1 copies that’s positive selection. Lions never developed it because they don’t eat starch 2:Gut ratio matters because it shows digestive adaptation, not just size. Omnivores have longer guts relative to body size to ferment fiber and starches lions don’t. And no, we don’t eat the same food; lions can’t digest plants or grains at all 3:We partially ferment fiber into SCFAs via gut microbiota lions can’t. That’s a key omnivore trait 4.Lions have roughly the same or stronger acidity (pH ~1.5) needed to digest raw flesh and bones. Ours fluctuates around 1.5–2.0 for a mixed diet 5:We don’t need infinite taurine we synthesize enough from cysteine and methionine. Lions can’t synthesize any, which is why they’re obligate carnivores 5:No gene was found her case was never studied genetically. Most likely she got animal proteins from milk and eggs. One anecdote doesn’t override established feline physiology.
 
What's isotope data?
Literal proof humans ate more meat than wolves and hyenas 50k years ago and recently

Like it's 100% proof it's not debatable
 
1:Amylase is literally a textbook example of dietary evolution. Populations that ate more starch have more AMY1 copies that’s positive selection. Lions never developed it because they don’t eat starch 2:Gut ratio matters because it shows digestive adaptation, not just size. Omnivores have longer guts relative to body size to ferment fiber and starches lions don’t. And no, we don’t eat the same food; lions can’t digest plants or grains at all 3:We partially ferment fiber into SCFAs via gut microbiota lions can’t. That’s a key omnivore trait 4.Lions have roughly the same or stronger acidity (pH ~1.5) needed to digest raw flesh and bones. Ours fluctuates around 1.5–2.0 for a mixed diet 5:We don’t need infinite taurine we synthesize enough from cysteine and methionine. Lions can’t synthesize any, which is why they’re obligate carnivores 5:No gene was found her case was never studied genetically. Most likely she got animal proteins from milk and eggs. One anecdote doesn’t override established feline physiology.
Yes no shit because people with higher AMY1 survived more AFTER agriculture because every poor person (99%) was forced to eat grains and those with low AMY1 copies fucking died

You still have to prove how gut ratio matters for digestion if the food being eaten is the same and the digestive system length is the same absolute wise

Nope lions have 2.0+ ph humans 1.5 ph retard even 3.0 is carnivore

If we ate cooked meat and plants then our ph wouldn't have been selected to kill pathogens in raw meat

Yes youre right we need less taurine but we dont actually know how much we need at all

Wait so lion survived 10 years on eggs and milk wow
 
  • AMY1 duplication predates agriculture it’s proof of long-term starch adaptation, not a “poor farmer mutation.”
  • Gut ratio matters because digestion scales with body size, not absolute meters. Humans have ~10× body length intestines, lions 3-4× that’s omnivore vs. obligate carnivore physiology.
  • Human stomach acidity fluctuates (1.5–3.5) and evolved to handle diverse, pathogen-rich foods not raw flesh.
  • Little Tyke didn’t live on plants she ate milk and eggs (animal nutrients).
  • Humans synthesize taurine, lions can’t.
 
Yes no shit because people with higher AMY1 survived more AFTER agriculture because every poor person (99%) was forced to eat grains and those with low AMY1 copies fucking died

You still have to prove how gut ratio matters for digestion if the food being eaten is the same and the digestive system length is the same absolute wise

Nope lions have 2.0+ ph humans 1.5 ph retard even 3.0 is carnivore

If we ate cooked meat and plants then our ph wouldn't have been selected to kill pathogens in raw meat

Yes youre right we need less taurine but we dont actually know how much we need at all

Wait so lion survived 10 years on eggs and milk wow
 
You don't need studies. Just eat and look what feels better.

 
You don't need studies. Just eat and look what feels better.

View attachment 4206376
1760371615470


lmao what a bunch of faggots, do they have passionate anal sex with each other after the photo session as well?
 
  • AMY1 duplication predates agriculture it’s proof of long-term starch adaptation, not a “poor farmer mutation.”
  • Gut ratio matters because digestion scales with body size, not absolute meters. Humans have ~10× body length intestines, lions 3-4× that’s omnivore vs. obligate carnivore physiology.
  • Human stomach acidity fluctuates (1.5–3.5) and evolved to handle diverse, pathogen-rich foods not raw flesh.
  • Little Tyke didn’t live on plants she ate milk and eggs (animal nutrients).
  • Humans synthesize taurine, lions can’t.
There is literally no proof AMY1 duplication predates agriculture it's inferential

Literally everyone from mesopotamia to the end of medieval ages and even later ate 80% grain diet and VERY LOW meat

That's EXTEREME selection for AMY1 genes
 
There is literally no proof AMY1 duplication predates agriculture it's inferential

Literally everyone from mesopotamia to the end of medieval ages and even later ate 80% grain diet and VERY LOW meat

That's EXTEREME selection for AMY1 genes
The AMY1 duplication is inferential like all molecular evolution evidence but it’s supported by empirical data.
Perry et al. (Nature Genetics 2007) explicitly found elevated AMY1 copy numbers in pre-agricultural hunter–gatherer populations, showing starch adaptation predates farming.
Agriculture amplified the selection, it didn’t create it.
Chimpanzees (1 copy) vs. humans (6–10 copies) already proves the event occurred before the Neolithic.
You’re confusing “secondary selection pressure” with initial evolution. Also, your “80% grain for everyone” claim is a historical oversimplification human diets were regionally diverse long before industrial agriculture.
1760402945903
 

Similar threads

gimmedatacc
Replies
13
Views
185
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
BigBallsLarry
Replies
58
Views
411
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
_MVP_
Replies
2
Views
70
gigacumster3000
gigacumster3000

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top