HUNTER EYES DONT MATTER

spongeleft

spongeleft

Iron
Joined
Dec 28, 2025
Posts
43
Reputation
32
they look uncanny, "hunter eyes" look TERRIBLE. good eye area DOESNT MEAN HUNTER EYES!1!!1
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: aDifferentPerspect, lblamemyse1f and -BayHarbourButcher
iqlet dnr
 
  • +1
Reactions: lblamemyse1f
1766944876067
 
  • +1
Reactions: LegendaryKennen and Ldar09867
they look uncanny, "hunter eyes" look TERRIBLE. good eye area DOESNT MEAN HUNTER EYES!1!!1
Joined Dec 28 2 posts and 0 rep yeah ill take your word bro you seem knowledgeable
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohi_100, mltn2mtn and iblamewerner
they look uncanny, "hunter eyes" look TERRIBLE. good eye area DOESNT MEAN HUNTER EYES!1!!1
Bug eyed indian coping so hard girls usually compliment my eyes.
 
Both hunter eyes and non-hunter eyes can look fine, it depends, but I agree that it's more of PSL autism. Some UEE is okay, if you still have decent bones there and undereye area. Zero UEE makes eyelashes less noticeable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PascalCase
obv it depends as long as u dont look uncanny it can look fine. but so many ppl try squinting their eyes thinking it looks good when they look tard and kind of chinese (no offense to asians btw). i think deep set almond eyes are the best tho but hunter eyes are fine as long as they dont look uncanny.
 

Similar threads

toppins
Replies
19
Views
587
StyIix
StyIix
C
Replies
18
Views
329
DavidePollo
DavidePollo
ihateevb
Replies
3
Views
55
ihateevb
ihateevb
Michael Vornik X
Replies
15
Views
238
spongeleft
spongeleft
Daniel zacks
Replies
12
Views
55
xzylecrey
xzylecrey

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top