Hypergamy has always existed, even in the “good days”

[Jagged0]

Full head of hair, great jaw, low bf this was a man who was able to pass on his genes in the “good days” people who cope about it’s too hard nowadays it was easier in the past are delusional you still had to look good in the top percentage to pass on your genes.

 

[greycel]

1. Didn’t exist to the extent it currently does. Men were not simps, didn’t artificially raise the value of women. They also had morals, would not praise another man’s woman.. so the woman as a result only relied on the opinion of her own man. She’d dress nice to impress her own husband, as opposed to nowadays

2. Was less looks based

3. The looks (according to society) had stronger correlation with looks according to nature, true eugenics.. not like nowadays where twink femboys on TikTok are getting simped on/ very tiny waist is seen as aesthetic on guys, causing demand for hyper-specific rare niches that aren’t in concordance with dimorphism (a man in nature)

4. Good development, most guys then had better environment/epigenetics. Less variance in looks. Not being recessed nowadays is good enough to be HTN (lack of falios - top 15%).. and most of your facial features/bones are affected from recession, so you stand to lose more — bigger gap between both ends

5. Following from point 2, your fate was less predetermined. Your effort would result in your success with women. Money/status/character are all things that mattered more, and women were fine with that. I’ll make a thread very soon explaining value exchange, and I’ll tag you in it