D
Deleted member 11126
Kraken
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2020
- Posts
- 11,736
- Reputation
- 14,359
Do people really even look better today?
I've seen many memes that suggest that by 2040, everyone will be taller and more good-looking. However, I believe this claim is incorrect. In fact, people today may be less attractive than at any point in the last century. While nutrition can have a positive impact on height, the difference in height between now and the past, such as during World War II, is minimal average american soldiers were 5'8-9. Moreover, factors such as mouth breathing and toxic environments may have contributed to a decline in physical appearance. I have noticed that yearbooks from the 1980s feature many better-looking people than what I observe today. While this is not entirely genetic and mostly a result of environmental factors, it is true that people in the past looked better in almost every way.
Hypergamy does not = procreation or natural selection
www.eviemagazine.com
The numbers here are almost unprecedented. There have been many time periods where over half of men did not procreate men died in wars much more and were always more disposable. But women who made it to adulthood almost all had children. Spinstress's as they were called in the past were social pariahs and made up a very low percent of unmarried childless women the vast majority of them were infertile it was said that 80% of women born throughout history had kids as opposed to 40% of men. This not taking in account women who died before they were of age if you add that it was more like 90%.
If women sleep with high value chads but do not have kids from it then it really means nothing. Women chasing chads expect to get chad to commit in a LTR with them birth control abortion and other sexual contraceptives allow women to avoid the consequences of sleeping with these men outside a marriage. Women are using up there most fertile years chasing men who will never commit and since they have cucked nature itself with birth control they also do not bare any children from this behavior. By the time women have no easy access to Chads they have already lost most of their youth beauty and fertility is down the drain. In an ironic twist of fate you often find the biggest Whores ending up with betacuck(former incels) at 30 because they have lost all other options. This is largely dysgenic in itself but on the other half most women just stay bitter and die alone with no kids an even worse fate.
Why the West's situation is far worse then China, Japan, Korean and the rest of Asia...
I've already explained above how hypergamy or dating up does not equal procreating with higher quality men since many have kids with cucked men. But the West is different then Asia with the fact that it still has millions of migrants and low IQ people having children. Asia's situation is not good either but they will not suffer as much. The birth rates in the West are much lower then you think when you take into account how many kids being born are from 1st gen migrants. So not only is it a birth rate issue the West has an issue with displacement too.
www.pewresearch.org
In the US a 8% of children born yearly were from "undocumented immigrants" the average birth rate being 3-4 kids per woman depending on the study.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This also applies to people on welfare who have more kids then the national average meaning someone who makes no taxable income is able to have more kids then someone making a middle class income or higher. The average person on welfare is around 85-90 IQ. The state in the US also pays single mothers more money per kid they have.
What people fail to take into consideration here is that the lowest 20-30% of women are having multiple kids younger. You see trailer trash families with 8 kids. And migrants in Europe or America come from cultures with insanely high birth rates. A sorority girl is the last kind of girl you will find having a kid at 19 with Chad lmao she will get an abortion for her "career".
Conclusion:
Made this because a lot of people act like hypergamy in its current form are the end all be all of human natural selection. Natural selection is not the fittest but the most adaptive since we have gotten rid of all natural deaths for the most part then there is no curve for survival. Sexual selection does not apply when you are talking about people who will have kids with anyone or anything. Disregard for consequences and impulsiveness are the only things that promote birth rates in such a sterile hypergamous society where marriage and controlled family creation is a thing of the past. Sorry to break everyones bubble but the future is not tall chads and stacies its this.
I've seen many memes that suggest that by 2040, everyone will be taller and more good-looking. However, I believe this claim is incorrect. In fact, people today may be less attractive than at any point in the last century. While nutrition can have a positive impact on height, the difference in height between now and the past, such as during World War II, is minimal average american soldiers were 5'8-9. Moreover, factors such as mouth breathing and toxic environments may have contributed to a decline in physical appearance. I have noticed that yearbooks from the 1980s feature many better-looking people than what I observe today. While this is not entirely genetic and mostly a result of environmental factors, it is true that people in the past looked better in almost every way.
Hypergamy does not = procreation or natural selection
45% Of Women Are Expected To Be Single And Childless By 2030, Per Recent Projection
Focusing on women and celebrating what makes them so unique, Evie Magazine helps women seek truth and find beauty...the kind that really matters.
The numbers here are almost unprecedented. There have been many time periods where over half of men did not procreate men died in wars much more and were always more disposable. But women who made it to adulthood almost all had children. Spinstress's as they were called in the past were social pariahs and made up a very low percent of unmarried childless women the vast majority of them were infertile it was said that 80% of women born throughout history had kids as opposed to 40% of men. This not taking in account women who died before they were of age if you add that it was more like 90%.
If women sleep with high value chads but do not have kids from it then it really means nothing. Women chasing chads expect to get chad to commit in a LTR with them birth control abortion and other sexual contraceptives allow women to avoid the consequences of sleeping with these men outside a marriage. Women are using up there most fertile years chasing men who will never commit and since they have cucked nature itself with birth control they also do not bare any children from this behavior. By the time women have no easy access to Chads they have already lost most of their youth beauty and fertility is down the drain. In an ironic twist of fate you often find the biggest Whores ending up with betacuck(former incels) at 30 because they have lost all other options. This is largely dysgenic in itself but on the other half most women just stay bitter and die alone with no kids an even worse fate.
Why the West's situation is far worse then China, Japan, Korean and the rest of Asia...
I've already explained above how hypergamy or dating up does not equal procreating with higher quality men since many have kids with cucked men. But the West is different then Asia with the fact that it still has millions of migrants and low IQ people having children. Asia's situation is not good either but they will not suffer as much. The birth rates in the West are much lower then you think when you take into account how many kids being born are from 1st gen migrants. So not only is it a birth rate issue the West has an issue with displacement too.
Number of U.S.-born babies with unauthorized immigrant parents has fallen since 2007
About 250,000 babies were born to unauthorized immigrant parents in the United States in 2016, down from 390,000 in 2007.
www.pewresearch.org
Welfare and the family size decision of low-income, two-parent families - PubMed
Welfare and the family size decision of low-income, two-parent families
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
What people fail to take into consideration here is that the lowest 20-30% of women are having multiple kids younger. You see trailer trash families with 8 kids. And migrants in Europe or America come from cultures with insanely high birth rates. A sorority girl is the last kind of girl you will find having a kid at 19 with Chad lmao she will get an abortion for her "career".
Conclusion:
Made this because a lot of people act like hypergamy in its current form are the end all be all of human natural selection. Natural selection is not the fittest but the most adaptive since we have gotten rid of all natural deaths for the most part then there is no curve for survival. Sexual selection does not apply when you are talking about people who will have kids with anyone or anything. Disregard for consequences and impulsiveness are the only things that promote birth rates in such a sterile hypergamous society where marriage and controlled family creation is a thing of the past. Sorry to break everyones bubble but the future is not tall chads and stacies its this.
Last edited:
