I always hear males have lower standards but why is it males have lower standards as a general rule ?

[reptiles]

I mean in general most males here are not attracted to most women there standard cels most the time based on the tinder matches I've seen so why are normies so open to fucking anything under the sun ? it harms the SMV of men so much because when males like this exist they will start mass spamming tinder profiles or other dating apps until the women get flooded with options personally and I don't wanna be told I'm coping here but as a general rule for me personally I won't put in 1/10 the effort the normie would even if a women asked me out.

If I really wanted it that badly I would have a female friend circle I don't I actively avoid them but why don't normies as a general rule behave like me ? or others here why aren't they picky ? it just doesn't make sense.

 

[Orc]

we don't have lower standards for dating, only for having sex, but women don't understand the difference, they don't realize most of the guys that fuck them have no interest in forming a relationship, hence why they end up with giant egos thinking those are the kind of men they're able to get, because they're able to fuck them, they live in the illusion that they're able to secure them when needed even though it's not the case.

 

[reptiles]

we don't have lower standards for dating, only for having sex, but women don't understand the difference, they don't realize most of the guys that fuck them have no interest in forming a relationship, hence why they end up with giant egos thinking those are the kind of men they're able to get, because they're able to fuck them, they live in the illusion that they're able to secure them when needed even though it's not the case.

I hope your right because I see a lot of cucks at my work place hell this forum as soon as a jungle gook came all of a sudden every 1 started simping it happened in lookism.net as well like how do you get it through males skulls that just because a women exists doesn't mean she automatically attractive.

 

[Deleted member 23017]

Women are hypergamous, men are polygamous. Mother Nature made women extremely picky (due to having a way larger investment in the offspring) thus it made men way less picky to counter balance. To use a metaphore: if you're starving, you might as well eat garbage. In other words: beggers can't be choosers.

 

[Psychophilly]

at the end of day, we just want something other than fucking cuck napkins to cum into. not sure about what woman wants really

 

[Berbercel]

Because they don't have many options, they can choose between having no standards or being celibate. If a man has a large pool of foids to choose from, he would become more picky but as it stands now, many men feel lucky if they get anything at all.

 

[Orc]

I hope your right because I see a lot of cucks at my work place hell this forum as soon as a jungle gook came all of a sudden every 1 started simping it happened in lookism.net as well like how do you get it through males skulls that just because a women exists doesn't mean she automatically attractive.

it's like that until they're 30 years old and then reality hits and they have to settle for some skinny fat office gremlin for the rest of their lives.


even when it comes to chasing, most of the guys doing it aren't interested in a relationship, they're just trying to fuck them.

dating and sex is separate for men, it is not for women, they only fuck potential dating partners, it doesn't matter whether they're not consciously planning to date you, you still have to fit the same criteria.

 

[Foreverbrad]

it's like that until they're 30 years old and then reality hits and they have to settle for some skinny fat office gremlin for the rest of their lives.


even when it comes to chasing, most of the guys doing it aren't interested in a relationship, they're just trying to fuck them.

Hardly, you’ve seen granny fish experiments and I can verify first hand that women still have guys blowing up their inboxes at any age. If a guy can’t get prime women he’ll widen his net, not just in looks but also definitively in age.

 

[Orc]

Hardly, you’ve seen granny fish experiments and I can verify first hand that women still have guys blowing up their inboxes at any age. If a guy can’t get prime women he’ll widen his net, not just in looks but also definitively in age.

those guys blowing up their dm's aren't interested in dating them, they're going for an easy lay.

 

[Anasurimbor]

sex drive. Here people have mostly female brain wiring thust overhwelming majority are high inbition standarcdcels. Nothing wrong with that but as male you can allow yourself to behave that way only if you are high status or you are good looking to the point that females approach you. Although if you are passive and rely only on looks you will always be approched by those who are below you.

 

[reptiles]

Women are hypergamous, men are polygamous. Mother Nature made women extremely picky (due to having a way larger investment in the offspring) thus it made men way less picky to counter balance. To use a metaphore: if you're starving, you might as well eat garbage. In other words: beggers can't be choosers.

I get that it all boils down the gametes males have low parental investment females have high parental investment the issue is can we not rise above that lower nature

 

[Deleted member 23017]

I get that it all boils down the gametes males have low parental investment females have high parental investment the issue is can we not rise above that lower nature

Of course not.

 

[reptiles]

@Arborist
@RecessedSubhumanX

Sex requires more investment and risk from women. Women’s gametes are costlier to produce, and internal fertilization and gestation make females more vulnerable during and after pregnancy (Trivers, 1972), increasing their dependence on others for the survival of infants and themselves. Given the nature of these investments and risks of sex, women have evolved discerning tastes when selecting mates. Specifically, women have evolved preferences for men with signifiers of good genes, because such genes will be conducive to an offspring’s survival, and preferences for men who are emotionally invested in the relationship, as such men might be inclined to provide long-term protection and support to help rear young. Such benefits would improve women’s life expectancies and infant survival rates relative to women who chose partners of poor quality, or partners who abandoned them. Thus, selection pressures may have favored women’s preferences for good genes and emotional attachment, and such preferences may further serve as compelling OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Fri Aug 12 2022, NEWGEN C23.S2 C23.P5 C23.S3 C23.P6 C23.P7 _Book.indb 613 /12_first_proofs/first_proofs/xml_for_typesetting 12-Aug-22 20:51:58 614 Joshua Everett Ryan and Edward P. Lemay, Jr. motivators for infidelity. That is, women might be especially inclined to be unfaithful if an existing partner is of poor quality, if the partner is not a good means of emotional support, or if a male who offers more emotional fulfillment or higher gene quality becomes available (Buss, 2000).

https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7262442/mod_resource/content/1/OHEPRR%20-%20proof%208-16-2022.pdf#page=657

M8 the black pill is mainstream academia yet cucks can't accept it ppl think this is a cultural problem. No this is a biological problem it spawns from 2 reasons Female gametes being costly and the 2nd 1 women favour men who will commit to them with good genes.


The data doesn't fucking lie tbqh

 

[reptiles]

Of course not.

I mean aratamise inhibitors in males inhibits eastrogen and you need an ratio of Eastrogen and Testarone as a man to find female attractive that is the theory behind it.

Inhibitors turn of estrogen the issue is women Eastrogen binds to your bones making them denser it has insane risks but on the plus side if you are an incel it will kill sexual desire while not giving you man tits or other subhuman tranny traits

 

[Foreverbrad]

those guys blowing up their dm's aren't interested in dating them, they're going for an easy lay.

So if your options are date an obese LTB with unrealistic expectations and high body count in her 20s or a slim, athletic divorcee in her 40s, or go for easy lays but actually be incel… what would you choose? That’s actually kinda how my options look on tinder.

 

[Deleted member 15302]

I mean aratamise inhibitors in males inhibits eastrogen and you need an ratio of Eastrogen and Testarone as a man to find female attractive that is the theory behind it.

Inhibitors turn of estrogen the issue is women Eastrogen binds to your bones making them denser it has insane risks but on the plus side if you are an incel it will kill sexual desire while not giving you man tits or other subhuman tranny traits

speak english nigga

 

[ToTheTop]

we don't have lower standards for dating, only for having sex, but women don't understand the difference, they don't realize most of the guys that fuck them have no interest in forming a relationship, hence why they end up with giant egos thinking those are the kind of men they're able to get, because they're able to fuck them, they live in the illusion that they're able to secure them when needed even though it's not the case.

And these woman then complain when they’re above 25 and say no men are serious on dating apps after just getting pumped and dumped by the chads meanwhile ignoring their looksmatch

 

[Deleted member 15302]

I get that it all boils down the gametes males have low parental investment females have high parental investment the issue is can we not rise above that lower nature

no. sex is the default meaning of life. people are too retarded to go against their emotions and act logically.

why do looks matter at all? bluepill is logical in the sense that looks literally don’t contribute to modern society. we should prioritize things like intelligence, ambition, and lifespan, but we don’t.

the average becky hearing “it matters what’s on the inside”:

ILL DATE WHO I WANT TO DATE. SLAYYU

 

[Orc]

So if your options are date an obese LTB with unrealistic expectations and high body count in her 20s or a slim, athletic divorcee in her 40s, or go for easy lays but actually be incel… what would you choose? That’s actually kinda how my options look on tinder.

do the same as everyone else does, you have sex with them and just never form a relationship, men barely get any benefit out of it anyway.

the DM's of 35 year old roasties aren't filled with high quality partners who've got future prospects with them, they're just filled with men trying to get laid for the night.

 

[reptiles]

no. sex is the default meaning of life. people are too retarded to go against their emotions and act logically.

why do looks matter at all? bluepill is logical in the sense that looks literally don’t contribute to modern society. we should prioritize things like intelligence, ambition, and lifespan, but we don’t.

the average becky hearing “it matters what’s on the inside”:
View attachment 1973978
ILL DATE WHO I WANT TO DATE. SLAYYU

What's attractive to men and women is hormone dependent women are heavily dependent on oestrogen and oestrogen when they are in the ovulatory cycle they feel most attraction to men high up on the sexual dimorphism scale however because those males leave they evolved to look at the long term costs of that spawn hence they pick some 1 who will stick around.

This is mainstream science but what I don't get is why would males want to be the 3rd wheel why would they put in this much effort for a whore that sees you as 2nd best.

 

[ToTheTop]

I mean in general most males here are not attracted to most women there standard cels most the time based on the tinder matches I've seen so why are normies so open to fucking anything under the sun ? it harms the SMV of men so much because when males like this exist they will start mass spamming tinder profiles or other dating apps until the women get flooded with options personally and I don't wanna be told I'm coping here but as a general rule for me personally I won't put in 1/10 the effort the normie would even if a women asked me out.

If I really wanted it that badly I would have a female friend circle I don't I actively avoid them but why don't normies as a general rule behave like me ? or others here why aren't they picky ? it just doesn't make sense.

I’m a maxxed HTN with good appeal and a nice lifestyle. I basically have FWB with MTB-HTBs. I’m therefore not going to be serious with anyone unless they’re better than the rest (Stacylite).

So the reason why guys hookup down is to keep them preoccupied while they find someone better. Girls do the same but expect free dinner while they wait for someone better.

Most normies will have to give everything just to potentially date and have to give a relationship to get laid.

 

[reptiles]

I’m a maxxed HTN with good appeal and a nice lifestyle. I basically have FWB with MTB-HTBs. I’m therefore not going to be serious with anyone unless they’re better than the rest (Stacylite).

So the reason why guys hookup down is to keep them preoccupied while they find someone better. Girls do the same but expect free dinner while they wait for someone better.

Most normies will have to give everything just to potentially date and have to give a relationship to get laid.

If most normies stopped trying as hard how differen't doing you think the dating market would be ? bearing in mind women are bioloically built to be mothers or to seek out off spring if chad is gone and normies aren't trying as hard how much do you think society would change

 

[Deleted member 15302]

What's attractive to men and women is hormone dependent women are heavily dependent on oestrogen and oestrogen when they are in the ovulatory cycle they feel most attraction to men high up on the sexual dimorphism scale however because those males leave they evolved to look at the long term costs of that spawn hence they pick some 1 who will stick around.

This is mainstream science but what I don't get is why would males want to be the 3rd wheel why would they put in this much effort for a whore that sees you as 2nd best.

because it’s all they can get. normie men are desperate and unaware. most normies don’t realize how bad they have it. it can be argued most guys can get into a relationship but how many of those relationships are just some whore monkey branching, cheating, etc. how many girls in relationships lie about their body count?

normie men are deluded. they think they’re in a relationship with a loving partner with 3 bodies when in reality that loving partner has 10+ bodies, is still in love with her ex, hits up celebrities and micro celebrities on a regular basis, is monkey branching, and probably cheats.

 

[ToTheTop]

If most normies stopped trying as hard how differen't doing you think the dating market would be ? bearing in mind women are bioloically built to be mothers or to seek out off spring if chad is gone and normies aren't trying as hard how much do you think society would change

The issue starts at the top - dating apps and instagram mean chads take all woman that are reasonable. A 6/10 chick will therefore assume she is a 8/10 but she confuses her hookup value with relationship value. This means a 6/10 guy is forced to reduce his standards as most 6/10 chicks will not go for him due to her hypergamy tempting her to keep picking the chad. If she’s smart she will realise this, pick the 6/10 guy and not let him know of her past and make him think she’s the best he has ever had.

I therefore only date 19-24 year olds and I’m a 27 year old guy.

The internet has fucked the dating market unless you’re a chad basically.

 

[reptiles]

The issue starts at the top - dating apps and instagram mean chads take all woman that are reasonable. A 6/10 chick will therefore assume she is a 8/10 but she confuses her hookup value with relationship value. This means a 6/10 guy is forced to reduce his standards as most 6/10 chicks will not go for him due to her hypergamy tempting her to keep picking the chad. If she’s smart she will realise this, pick the 6/10 guy and not let him know of her past and make him think she’s the best he has ever had.

I therefore only date 19-24 year olds and I’m a 27 year old guy.

The internet has fucked the dating market unless you’re a chad basically.

I mean your right it's not even the 80/20 anymore it's 95/5 according to tinder stats is IRL that brutal ? no but it's still bloody brutal the issue is most males are blue pilled

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

we don't have lower standards for dating, only for having sex, but women don't understand the difference, they don't realize most of the guys that fuck them have no interest in forming a relationship, hence why they end up with giant egos thinking those are the kind of men they're able to get, because they're able to fuck them, they live in the illusion that they're able to secure them when needed even though it's not the case.

good explanation real shit

 

[ToTheTop]

because it’s all they can get. normie men are desperate and unaware. most normies don’t realize how bad they have it. it can be argued most guys can get into a relationship but how many of those relationships are just some whore monkey branching, cheating, etc. how many girls in relationships lie about their body count?

normie men are deluded. they think they’re in a relationship with a loving partner with 3 bodies when in reality that loving partner has 10+ bodies, is still in love with her ex, hits up celebrities and micro celebrities on a regular basis, is monkey branching, and probably cheats.

Sadly pretty true. Men don’t have to lie as it doesn’t reduce their SMV. But if a woman was honest and said all the shit she has done her real market value would drop like a rock.

 

[reptiles]

because it’s all they can get. normie men are desperate and unaware. most normies don’t realize how bad they have it. it can be argued most guys can get into a relationship but how many of those relationships are just some whore monkey branching, cheating, etc. how many girls in relationships lie about their body count?

normie men are deluded. they think they’re in a relationship with a loving partner with 3 bodies when in reality that loving partner has 10+ bodies, is still in love with her ex, hits up celebrities and micro celebrities on a regular basis, is monkey branching, and probably cheats.

I mean your 2nd paragraph is 100 percent correct even by the most soy text books that preach gender is a social construct even they admir to this

 

[reptiles]

Sadly pretty true. Men don’t have to lie as it doesn’t reduce their SMV. But if a woman was honest and said all the shit she has done her real market value would drop like a rock.

Its so suifuel males aren't being told of this shit man and lengths society goes to normalise this shit note she won't settle for a partner who cheats but you have to

 

[ToTheTop]

I mean your right it's not even the 80/20 anymore it's 95/5 according to tinder stats is IRL that brutal ? no but it's still bloody brutal the issue is most males are blue pilled

If the chick has any social media then it’s likely pretty bad yes. Even if she meets you irl she will have chad hitting her up way more than prior to the rising of social media. She will be tempted so much that she likely will branch away.

IRL is better as you can demonstrate other values external to blackpill. But it’s pretty bad in general yes.

 

[ToTheTop]

Its so suifuel males aren't being told of this shit man and lengths society goes to normalise this shit note she won't settle for a partner who cheats but you have to

She will settle for a partner that cheats. Because her hypergamy means she prefers a guy who is higher SMV who treats her well enough, than a guy who gives her everything but isn’t as attractive.

As long as the guy doesn’t cheat disrespectfully (keeps it away from their life together) she often won’t care. Woman care about getting the highest value man that will always come back to her.

 

[reptiles]

If the chick has any social media then it’s likely pretty bad yes. Even if she meets you irl she will have chad hitting her up way more than prior to the rising of social media. She will be tempted so much that she likely will branch away.

IRL is better as you can demonstrate other values external to blackpill. But it’s pretty bad in general yes.

Bro if i have values it has to be receprical most males should think like that why should you have to commit not cheat and treat her decently but she can cheat and abuse you like crap.

 

[reptiles]

She will settle for a partner that cheats. Because her hypergamy means she prefers a guy who is higher SMV who treats her well enough, than a guy who gives her everything but isn’t as attractive.

As long as the guy doesn’t cheat disrespectfully (keeps it away from their life together) she often won’t care. Woman care about getting the highest value man that will always come back to her.

Somr women are willing to do that but as a general rule according to thw data women will not share they want to keep chad but they are deluded cause won't stay.

Sharing leads to jealousy and bitterness

 

[ToTheTop]

Somr women are willing to do that but as a general rule according to thw data women will not share they want to keep chad but they are deluded cause won't stay.

Sharing leads to jealousy and bitterness

Yeah so they basically get smashed by the highest value smv in their dms and they realise he won’t stay and they reduce their standards.

I don’t want to be that guy whose standards she reduced them for while she dreams of the chad sex she once had. I want to be her first choice. This means Looksmax to high appeal level and get into a relationship with a young chick.

 

[SubSigma]

I hope your right because I see a lot of cucks at my work place hell this forum as soon as a jungle gook came all of a sudden every 1 started simping it happened in lookism.net as well like how do you get it through males skulls that just because a women exists doesn't mean she automatically attractive.

@fucclife

 

[Deleted member 19036]

we don't have lower standards for dating, only for having sex, but women don't understand the difference, they don't realize most of the guys that fuck them have no interest in forming a relationship, hence why they end up with giant egos thinking those are the kind of men they're able to get, because they're able to fuck them, they live in the illusion that they're able to secure them when needed even though it's not the case.

based

 

[Sleeper]

Because men care about character more than looks. The only upside to being a man nowadays is that you can still be attracted to a 5/10 girl as long as she is loving and loyal but unless you're a loser cuck the it doesnt matter how good looking girl is some vapid slut then you dont want anything to do with her (sex doesnt count). Meanwhile for women everything revolves around sex alone

 

[irrumator praetor]

I mean in general most males here are not attracted to most women there standard cels most the time based on the tinder matches I've seen so why are normies so open to fucking anything under the sun ? it harms the SMV of men so much because when males like this exist they will start mass spamming tinder profiles or other dating apps until the women get flooded with options personally and I don't wanna be told I'm coping here but as a general rule for me personally I won't put in 1/10 the effort the normie would even if a women asked me out.

If I really wanted it that badly I would have a female friend circle I don't I actively avoid them but why don't normies as a general rule behave like me ? or others here why aren't they picky ? it just doesn't make sense.

Most of the time men are horny.

 

[Deleted member 19865]

Men tend to have low standards because women have a higher default SMV.

By default, women have a higher SMV due to sexual scarcity (women are only horny once a month). Men have higher SMV potential due to being more capable individuals overall, but it's very difficult and rare to reach the point where said capabilities exceed other men to the point where the male SMV disadvantage is nullified.