I am giga high iq— Ask me anything (AMA)

venom418

venom418

Banned
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Posts
711
Reputation
681
Title
Here yours chance to have a high iq answer and even a conversation with me
 
  • +1
Reactions: kazama
Why did your father leave you
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Copercel, subhuman1996, Thief and 1 other person
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: idk769876, Thief and ducktruck
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
He would chuck the required amount of woods for his intended purpose such as stockpiling or building a wooden house or cooking etc
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Shahnamehgymmaxx, Thief, existingandliving and 2 others
Rate in terms of importance: frame, face, neurotypicality and height
 
Rate in terms of importance: frame, face, neurotypicality and height
Never really left my house tbh
So I have no idea
I can only give high iq answers to abstract shit raw brainpower questions not stuff that requires leaving your room or external information and experiences
But as per my opinion
1)face
2) height
3)NT
4)frame
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Shahnamehgymmaxx, kazama and ducktruck
Title
Here yours chance to have a high iq answer and even a conversation with me
Could a 3 dimensional frequency data table be used to display more complex data sets?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mxrbled and Shahnamehgymmaxx
How can I grow 1 inch? In my dick and height too, and maybe in my wrist
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
How would you determine at what point something is sufficient and why
 
Rate in terms of importance: frame, face, neurotypicality and height
Holy greycel question :lul:

Neurotypicality is more important than face except in outlier cases (having a very good looking face or being very ugly)

After NT, it goes face, height, frame
 
Holy greycel question :lul:

Neurotypicality is more important than face except in outlier cases (having a very good looking face or being very ugly)

After NT, it goes face, height, frame
Maybe in your region.
giga NT people get friend zoned and cucked all the time
 
When will AI start to fuck us
 
How can I grow 1 inch? In my dick and height too, and maybe in my wrist
I have heard there is Limb lengthening and penis enlargement surgery
Not sure about wrist, just do 1hr reaserch and find the best way and training to thicken your wrist
 
When will AI start to fuck us
If you mean literally fuck ,then today itself if you want
If you mean fuck humanity and try to take over then it's not happening in our lifetimes
 
If you mean literally fuck ,then today itself if you want
If you mean fuck humanity and try to take over then it's not happening in our lifetimes
Fuck as in fuck over humanity
 
is gooning to femboys considered gay?
or is gooning to tomboys considered gay?
 
Fuck as in fuck over humanity
Too difficult to predict we went from killing niggers to helping them in less than one human life years
All of this technology evolved so fast it's exponential not linear
But I don't think it will happen I our lifetimes
So we are safe for 70 years minimum
 
  • +1
Reactions: UltimateCoper.
Bro, listen. When I asked you “what’s 2+2,” I wasn’t doing a math quiz. I don’t care if you know basic addition, a literal toddler could answer that. The whole point was a rhetorical setup. I threw you a softball because I expected you to flex some creativity, drop a funny or clever answer, something that actually shows quick wit and higher-level thinking.

But you just said “4.” Congrats, you’ve successfully passed kindergarten. That’s not high IQ, that’s lowest effort NPC response possible. If you think spitting out the obvious makes you look intelligent, you’re missing the whole social calibration aspect. High IQ isn’t about whether you know arithmetic, it’s about whether you can subvert expectations, flip a boring setup into something interesting, and prove your brain isn’t stuck in calculator mode.

Think about it: everybody already knows “2+2=4.” There’s literally zero flex in repeating it back. It’s the equivalent of someone asking “say something in Spanish” and you reply with “hola.” Technically correct, but nobody is impressed. The people who actually stand out are the ones who go further, who twist it in a way nobody expects. That’s what signals real intelligence — being able to play with concepts, not just repeat them.

For example, imagine if you’d said:
  • “2+2=22” because you’re concatenating instead of adding. Instant clever wordplay.
  • “In base 3, 2+2=11” — flexing math knowledge but still playful.
  • “Depends, women’s math says it’s 5” — savage social commentary.
  • “Two couples = a double date” — funny, flirty, creative.
See the difference? That’s the type of answer that gets a laugh, that makes people think, that demonstrates quick mental agility. THAT’S high IQ in practice. Not knowing facts, but knowing how to use them in a way that entertains, provokes, or surprises people.

So when I say answering “4” is low IQ, I don’t mean the statement itself is wrong. I mean the response lacks any kind of higher processing. It’s like a bot outputting the expected result. That’s literally the baseline of cognition. High IQ is all about surpassing the baseline. If you can’t banter, can’t twist, can’t innovate, then what good is raw IQ? You’re basically just a walking calculator. And nobody’s impressed by a calculator.

So yeah, next time you hear “what’s 2+2,” don’t autopilot into “4.” That’s NPC-tier. Show some creativity. Break the script. That’s where you separate yourself from the average guy who only knows the obvious.

:soy:
 
Bro, listen. When I asked you “what’s 2+2,” I wasn’t doing a math quiz. I don’t care if you know basic addition, a literal toddler could answer that. The whole point was a rhetorical setup. I threw you a softball because I expected you to flex some creativity, drop a funny or clever answer, something that actually shows quick wit and higher-level thinking.

But you just said “4.” Congrats, you’ve successfully passed kindergarten. That’s not high IQ, that’s lowest effort NPC response possible. If you think spitting out the obvious makes you look intelligent,
Only read till here
1) I was trying to not act like a smartass unlike most .org users
I Was trying to give ai like answers
You can see my other posts
And let's say i gave you a fun response
You would just flip the script and say
High iq individuals Dont feel the need to try and sound smart in every little interaction
You are trying very hard to prove you're smart
"Look at me I gave a quick fun, over the top response, my humor sooo high iq"
You could just flip the script either way
 
Only read till here
1) I was trying to not act like a smartass unlike most .org users
I Was trying to give ai like answers
You can see my other posts
And let's say i gave you a fun response
You would just flip the script and say
High iq individuals Dont feel the need to try and sound smart in every little interaction
You are trying very hard to prove you're smart
"Look at me I gave a quick fun, over the top response, my humor sooo high iq"
You could just flip the script either way
Bro I just made a copy pasta using chat gpt chill lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: venom418
Bro, listen. When I asked you “what’s 2+2,” I wasn’t doing a math quiz. I don’t care if you know basic addition, a literal toddler could answer that. The whole point was a rhetorical setup. I threw you a softball because I expected you to flex some creativity, drop a funny or clever answer, something that actually shows quick wit and higher-level thinking.

But you just said “4.” Congrats, you’ve successfully passed kindergarten. That’s not high IQ, that’s lowest effort NPC response possible. If you think spitting out the obvious makes you look intelligent, you’re missing the whole social calibration aspect. High IQ isn’t about whether you know arithmetic, it’s about whether you can subvert expectations, flip a boring setup into something interesting, and prove your brain isn’t stuck in calculator mode.

Think about it: everybody already knows “2+2=4.” There’s literally zero flex in repeating it back. It’s the equivalent of someone asking “say something in Spanish” and you reply with “hola.” Technically correct, but nobody is impressed. The people who actually stand out are the ones who go further, who twist it in a way nobody expects. That’s what signals real intelligence — being able to play with concepts, not just repeat them.

For example, imagine if you’d said:
  • “2+2=22” because you’re concatenating instead of adding. Instant clever wordplay.
  • “In base 3, 2+2=11” — flexing math knowledge but still playful.
  • “Depends, women’s math says it’s 5” — savage social commentary.
  • “Two couples = a double date” — funny, flirty, creative.
See the difference? That’s the type of answer that gets a laugh, that makes people think, that demonstrates quick mental agility. THAT’S high IQ in practice. Not knowing facts, but knowing how to use them in a way that entertains, provokes, or surprises people.

So when I say answering “4” is low IQ, I don’t mean the statement itself is wrong. I mean the response lacks any kind of higher processing. It’s like a bot outputting the expected result. That’s literally the baseline of cognition. High IQ is all about surpassing the baseline. If you can’t banter, can’t twist, can’t innovate, then what good is raw IQ? You’re basically just a walking calculator. And nobody’s impressed by a calculator.

So yeah, next time you hear “what’s 2+2,” don’t autopilot into “4.” That’s NPC-tier. Show some creativity. Break the script. That’s where you separate yourself from the average guy who only knows the obvious.

:soy:
And your test's reliability is shit
I used to do shit like this in 11th grade
And I was surprised multiple times how smart the people I deemed to be dumb, actually were
 
Is there a God?
 
Is there a God?
Depends on your definition
If muh Jesus muh Allah muh Hindu God
Then no
If better and more rational definition
For example spinozas God then the answers is=IDK
 

Similar threads

RapeAllFemales
Replies
10
Views
101
RapeAllFemales
RapeAllFemales
Tyler1
Replies
10
Views
167
RapeAllFemales
RapeAllFemales
g4rlic
Replies
2
Views
81
Incelforeever
Incelforeever
Jason Voorhees
Replies
30
Views
293
Aypo129
Aypo129

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top