i do not think chinks (china/korea/japan) should be considered ethnic. here's why (SERIOUS)

CelestialEmpire

CelestialEmpire

Slaughterer of 271K Jews
Joined
Jan 20, 2025
Posts
1,927
Reputation
2,303
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.

 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: aspiringexcel, Debetro, Frogooboi and 10 others
Greycel ramblings
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and Underdog9494
bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494
just shut the fuck up racist mf
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and niqfan625
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: truechadpreet, watah, HostSamurai and 3 others
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
An etnnic is someone not white (wasp)
 
  • +1
Reactions: niqfan625 and Deleted member 46404
dnr but im so glad to be born white
 
dnr but im so glad to be born white
Im brown but i understand
If your born ethnic your whole life will be spent coping and looking to be white
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: watah, niqfan625, HandsomeOrDeath and 1 other person
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Bro got exposed for larping as a wasp
 
  • +1
Reactions: niqfan625 and Deleted member 46404
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Bro got exposed for larping as a wasp
GTFO jew, rambling about muh "WASP lifemogging me to ropefuel is actually 5'6 trucel chink trust me bro!!"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truechadpreet and JeanneDArcAlter
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
I do not think chinks should be considered human. :forcedsmile::ROFLMAO::lul:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20241202_070055.jpg
    IMG_20241202_070055.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20241201_075920.jpg
    IMG_20241201_075920.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20241130_072726.jpg
    IMG_20241130_072726.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: niqfan625
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.

> "WASP"
> Writes an essay about Chinks being superior to other ethnics
> "Not a Chink bro"
> Still hates his own race by calling Chinks ugly

An essay about NEA superiority and it ends with him calling his own NEA features ugly.

 
  • +1
Reactions: niqfan625
It doesnt matter

Ethnic is anyone who isnt white or half white

This is what foids think
 
> "WASP"
> Writes an essay about Chinks being superior to other ethnics
> "Not a Chink bro"
> Still hates his own race by calling Chinks ugly

An essay about NEA superiority and it ends with him calling his own NEA features ugly.

maybe because its im not chink retard
 
  • JFL
Reactions: normie_joe
maybe because its im not chink retard

For a "not chink" you wrote an entire essay about them.

But it was still backhanded and you still think yourself as lesser than whites, which makes it 100% certain you are a chink like your self hating mother.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HandsomeOrDeath and niqfan625
retard raceTheory rambles once again
 
JFL:lul::lul::lul::lul:self hating retard please remove yourself from this forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: niqfan625
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
Retarded faggot
 
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
No I only love WASP men .
 
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
they are still ugly and short I would rather marry shaniqua who is 5'11 and have our kids be 6'5 jacked blue eyes lightskins then my son be a 5'6 HAPA with blue eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: lightskinniggga
जातीयता को क्या परिभाषित करता है?

- गरीब
- हिंसक
- गूंगा
- सांवली त्वचा
- रेपी
- कुरूप
- छोटा
- दाढ़ी/मूंछें
- अत्यंत धार्मिक

यह भूरे रंग के अलग-अलग रंगों के लोगों पर लागू होता है (पाजीत से लेकर सैंड निगर तक मेड से लेकर गंदे यहूदी से लेकर बीनर से लेकर काले तक)। हालाँकि, एनईए केवल 1 श्रेणी (बदसूरत) को पूरा करते हैं।

एनईए वास्तव में सभ्य लोग हैं और वे वह काम नहीं करते जो मुझे परेशान करता है, जैसा कि भूरे/काले लोग करते हैं।

उनके पास मूल रूप से अपने मूल देशों और पश्चिम दोनों में कोई अपराध नहीं है

मूल देशों और पश्चिम दोनों में उच्च आय

मूल देशों और पश्चिम दोनों में उच्च IQ

अपेक्षाकृत लंबा (या कम से कम वास्तविक जातीय लोगों जितना छोटा नहीं)

क्या जापान के अलावा घर और पश्चिम दोनों जगह बलात्कारी थोड़े विकृत नहीं हैं। लेकिन घर पर महिलाओं के साथ सामूहिक बलात्कार या पश्चिम में गोरी लड़कियों के साथ सामूहिक बलात्कार की तुलना में महिलाओं की स्कर्ट के नीचे की तस्वीरें लेना बहुत छोटी समस्या है, जैसा कि वास्तविक जातीय लोग करते हैं।

अधिकतर लोग धार्मिक नहीं होते हैं और उनके चेहरे पर घृणित बाल नहीं होते हैं जो कि आतंकवादियों/आतंकवादियों/चिकित्सकों/गंदे यहूदियों/बीनर्स/काले लोगों के होते हैं।

उन्हें "मानद सच्चे गोरे" माना जाना चाहिए और उन्हें नॉर्डिक्स जैसे निचले स्तर के सच्चे गोरों से केवल आधा स्तर नीचे, लेकिन डब्ल्यूएएसपी/जर्मनिक्स/डच जैसे ऊपरी स्तर के सच्चे गोरों से एक स्तर नीचे के रूप में देखा जाना चाहिए।

मैं चाहूंगा कि मेरा श्वेत पड़ोस 1% वास्तविक जातीय बनने के बजाय 25% एनईए बन जाए।

चिंक्स का एकमात्र नकारात्मक पक्ष यह है कि वे मैक्सिलरी मंदी के कारण देखने में बदसूरत हैं, बॉडीफैट की परवाह किए बिना स्थायी रूप से फूले हुए प्रतीत होते हैं और साथ ही कोई भौंह और बदसूरत गधा मोनोलिड नहीं है, लेकिन वास्तविक जातीयता से बचने के लिए यह एक छोटी सी कीमत है।
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truechadpreet
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
final boss of self-hating cope
blud was meat riding white people now spewing bullshit about how asains arent ethics clearly a self hating chink here :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: shredded4summer
Most of western society accepts them and rikes them
 
What defines an ethnic?

- Poor
- Violent
- Dumb
- Dark Skin
- Rapey
- Ugly
- Short
- Beards/Mustaches
- Extremely Religious

This applies to people of varying shades of brown (from pajeet to sand nigger to med to filthy jew to beaner to black). However, NEAs only meet 1 category (Ugly).

NEAs are actually really civilized people and they don't do the shit that pisses me off that brown/black people do.

They have basically no crime both in their native countries and in the West

High income both in native countries and in the West

High IQ both in native countries and in the West

Relatively tall (or at least not as short as actual ethnics)

Aren't rapey both at home and in the West apart from Japan being kinda perverted. But taking upskirt pictures of women is a VERY minor problem compared gangraping women at home or gangraping white girls in the West that actual ethnics do.

Mostly aren't religious and dont have disgusting facial hair that jeets/terrorists/meds/filthy jews/beaners/blacks tend to have.

They should be considered "honorary true whites" and be seen as just half a tier below lower-tier true whites like Nordics but a tier below upper-tier true whites like WASPs/Germanics/Dutch.

I would rather have my white neighborhood become 25% NEA than become 1% actual ethnic.

The only downside to Chinks is that they're ugly to look at due to maxillary recession, seemingly perma-bloat regardless of bodyfat as well as no browridge and ugly ass monolids, but that's a small price to pay to avoid actual ethnics.
Frist great thread u made.

u have my respect sort of as a gookologist
 

Similar threads

InanimatePragmatist
Replies
71
Views
5K
brutalpilled
brutalpilled
6ft4
Replies
182
Views
5K
heightisthetruth
heightisthetruth
lifeless
Replies
46
Views
2K
lifeless
lifeless
Sloppyseconds
Replies
54
Views
9K
Kayra139
Kayra139

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top