I hate parents who feed their kids goyslop

[Jatt]

This really is the true meaning of goyslop

Feeding yourself and the future slaves slop

Cucking their health and development

I’ve seen pregnant women eat goyslop

Infuriates me your son will grow up to be an incel ​

 

[Lorence]

Why do you type your threads like this.​

 

[topology]

Diet is cope.

 

[Jatt]

Diet is cope.

igf 1 signaller/sugarmaxxer

 

[Lorence]

Diet is cope.

May 24, 2025

 

[topology]

igf 1 signaller/sugarmaxxer

My dimorphism and angularity have gone from a 6.5 -> 8.5 ever since I've started igf-1 signaling.

 

[IronMike]

what is considered goyslop? Chipotle? Mcdonalds?

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Diet is cope.

not at all cope

 

[Jatt]

May 24, 2025

Dec 5, 2025

 

[Jatt]

what is considered goyslop? Chipotle? Mcdonalds?

Everything that isn’t single ingredient and contains seee oils etc

 

[topology]

not at all cope

It's 100% cope. None of the people you idolize were fed an optimal diet. The calories going inside is the majority of the growth. Diet only matters regarding health and acne.

 

[uglyman86594]

There's a fat bitch I see her daily on my ig she feeds her sons chicken cooked in diet soda I fucking hate her I didn't block her just to harass her in the comments

 

[Lebrons Me]

and eat curry like ur ass u spam gay bbcs sword fighting in threads fr

 

[764.]

Chicken curry maxxing much?

 

[764.]

It's 100% cope. None of the people you idolize were fed an optimal diet. The calories going inside is the majority of the growth. Diet only matters regarding health and acne.

Balderdash, irrational and said from an eccentric deinterlocutoroid.

 

[HundredManSlayer]

It's 100% cope. None of the people you idolize were fed an optimal diet. The calories going inside is the majority of the growth. Diet only matters regarding health and acne.

doesn't transfer over, their genetics are clearly much stronger/resistant to modern food and their ancestors had much better nutrition

 

[topology]

doesn't transfer over, their genetics are clearly much stronger/resistant to modern food and their ancestors had much better nutrition

Go ahead and prove that. Their ancestors having better nutrition would only hurt your claim as the change would cause a bigger difference within.

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Go ahead and prove that. Their ancestors having better nutrition would only hurt your claim as the change would cause a bigger difference within.

im not really sure what you mean by hurt my claim?

 

[StyIix]

This really is the true meaning of goyslop

Feeding yourself and the future slaves slop

Cucking their health and development

I’ve seen pregnant women eat goyslop

Infuriates me your son will grow up to be an incel ​

Sugar=chad jatt

 

[topology]

im not really sure what you mean by hurt my claim?

Your ancestors being used to a certain diet would case your body to adapt to that diet. If you go and disregard it, it's going to have a bigger issue than your ancestors not being used to it (which doesn't even make sense as the argument would apply to EVERYONE).

You're also over playing this issue, it wouldn't have a difference regarding looks or height.

There's many more things I could critique. Your point has no validity or claim.

 

[Seeyenar]

It's 100% cope. None of the people you idolize were fed an optimal diet. The calories going inside is the majority of the growth. Diet only matters regarding health and acne.

low IQ

They just had good genetics, of course someone with elite genetics can develop well on a sub-optimal diet.

Many of them would have developed even better if it was optimized.

 

[sergdying]

Sugar=chad jatt

sup bro

 

[Arbuscular]

This really is the true meaning of goyslop

Feeding yourself and the future slaves slop

Cucking their health and development

I’ve seen pregnant women eat goyslop

Infuriates me your son will grow up to be an incel ​

my mom did this only ate instant noodles from 6 years old to 12 and mouth breathed too, certainly that didn't affect my development at all! (I was literally modeling when I was a child and then became obese )

 

[topology]

low IQ

They just had good genetics, of course someone with elite genetics can develop well on a sub-optimal diet.

Many of them would have developed even better if it was optimized.

Yep, go ahead and prove that regarding facial aesthetics & height.

 

[StyIix]

sup bro

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Your ancestors being used to a certain diet would case your body to adapt to that diet. If you go and disregard it, it's going to have a bigger issue than your ancestors not being used to it (which doesn't even make sense as the argument would apply to EVERYONE).

You're also over playing this issue, it wouldn't have a difference regarding looks or height.

There's many more things I could critique. Your point has no validity or claim.

did you skip over the part i said their genetics would be stronger/more resistant?

the tallest people on earth on average drink a shit ton of milk and eat tons of cheese, over generations that will absolutely make a difference

 

[topology]

did you skip over the part i said their genetics would be stronger/more resistant?

That's not an argument though, that's speculative & could apply to anyone or anything. Your claims are baseless.

the tallest people on earth on average drink a shit ton of milk and eat tons of cheese, over generations that will absolutely make a difference

No, it will not. Milk does not change your genes. Your parents could be 4'1 and you could turn out to be 6'5 as they could starve themselves.

You're making the exact point Goatis made months back which I debunked. You don't know what you're talking about.

The link between milk consumption and height is not an argument either as correlation isn't cause.

--

Respond to me with 0 pseudo science or you have no argument. Toodles!

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Your claims are baseless.

your claims are baseless as well, so i dont know what you're talking about

Milk does not change your genes.

yeah obviously not, have you heard of epigenetics by any chance?

The link between milk consumption and height is not an argument either as correlation isn't cause.

agreed correlation isnt causation but you can look at many other groups and draw a conclusion from that

 

[topology]

your claims are baseless as well, so i dont know what you're talking about

My claims are that you have no evidence for what you're claiming. My stance is true until disproven.

yeah obviously not, have you heard of epigenetics by any chance?

You don't understand how epigenetics work. Epigenetics changes gene expression, not the underlying DNA sequence, so it does not permanently alter the genes that determine height. Most epigenetic marks are reset during reproduction, meaning environmental effects like drinking milk generally aren’t stably passed across generations. So while nutrition can help individuals reach their genetic height potential, it doesn’t make populations genetically taller over generations. You also fail to realize we haven't started eating "slop" until recently. The epigenetic factors you describe should still be within all of us.

And before you make the claim "but I thought nutrition was cope?" The majority of height comes from calories. The second biggest factor is protein and micronutrients come after. The "slop" you describe can cover the idealized micronutrients.

If the argument evolves into a "but I thought it was cope?" Then sure, micronutrients are needed to reach your genetic potential, but my point was that you can reach your genetic potential even with "slop" as Jatt makes it seem like you need (and I quote)

Everything that isn’t single ingredient and contains seee oils etc

That's needed for ideal health and acne, sure, but it's irrelevant for actual height and facial aesthetics.

agreed correlation isnt causation but you can look at many other groups and draw a conclusion from that

Looking at more groups doesn’t change the core issue, correlation still isn’t causation. Milk consumption is heavily correlated with wealth, overall protein intake, healthcare, etc, all of which affect height. Without isolating those variables, you cannot conclude milk itself is the reason.

 

[luuk]

This really is the true meaning of goyslop

Feeding yourself and the future slaves slop

Cucking their health and development

I’ve seen pregnant women eat goyslop

Infuriates me your son will grow up to be an incel ​

Yeah it sort of ruined my childhood
I can’t blame them that much because I was a picky eater aspie so they just gave me what I could palate but I was basically an incel until like the very last year of school

At least I still consumed loads of milk and a decent amount of protein but I was fat, undermuscled and unathletic because my parents let me eat like shit and live a sedentary lifestyle. Bone development ended up alright but narrow palate, overcrowding and mediocre mandibular width from too much soft goyslop.

I woke up and gained sentience at like 17 and had an existential crisis and now I’m here I guess, finally decently attractive and a late bloomer puberty wise but mentally fucked from it all. You can’t gain back that crucial developmental window, I will forever have severe trust & attachment issues, repressed anger & grief for my own childhood that I never really got a chance at

I envy the 14yos here who already know what’s up, even if it destroys their innocence a bit. 16-19 is arguably the most crucial period in your life and if you go through it ugly & KHHV you are COOOOKED

Do whatever it takes to not end up like that

 

[HundredManSlayer]

You don't understand how epigenetics work. Epigenetics changes gene expression, not the underlying DNA sequence, so it does not permanently alter the genes that determine height. Most epigenetic marks are reset during reproduction, meaning environmental effects like drinking milk generally aren’t stably passed across generations. So while nutrition can help individuals reach their genetic height potential, it doesn’t make populations genetically taller over generations. You also fail to realize we haven't started eating "slop" until recently. The epigenetic factors you describe should still be within all of us.

And before you make the claim "but I thought nutrition was cope?" The majority of height comes from calories. The second biggest factor is protein and micronutrients come after. The "slop" you describe can cover the idealized micronutrients.

If the argument evolves into a "but I thought it was cope?" Then sure, micronutrients are needed to reach your genetic potential, but my point was that you can reach your genetic potential even with "slop" as Jatt makes it seem like you need (and I quote)

you literally proved my point that diet is not cope

 

[topology]

you literally proved my point that diet is not cope

No, I did not. The point was more nuanced than what you interpreted. I debunked your claim of diet being a factor throughout generations too.

You could claim "you could starve yourself and not eat anything! so diet isn't cope! debunked." Is that not a misrepresentation of what I said?

Do you believe what Jatt believes regarding diet or do you believe the nutrient content is what to look at instead.

 

[luuk]

. You also fail to realize we haven't started eating "slop" until recently. The epigenetic factors you describe should still be within all of us.

For much of history the common person would subsist on mostly grain & veg with small amounts of dairy and rarely meat if they could get it, people had horrifically imbalanced diets and stunted growth & development

 

[topology]

For much of history the common person would subsist on mostly grain & veg with small amounts of dairy and rarely meat if they could get it, people had horrifically imbalanced diets and stunted growth & development

That is actually correct, I wasn't thinking about those groups and was rather on the marginalized ones. The point of epigenetics being a useless argument still stands though.

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Do you believe what Jatt believes regarding diet or do you believe the nutrient content is what to look at instead.

i believe both, animal foods are the most nutrient dense foods on the planet and you should avoid goyslop at all costs

 

[topology]

i believe both, animal foods are the most nutrient dense foods on the planet and you should avoid goyslop at all costs

You cannot believe both as what I was implying was contradictory.

Do you believe only the nutrient content matters or should we only eat non "goyslop?" You could make the claim of animal foods being the most nutrient dense but you could get the nutrient content needed with "goyslop" too, so where does the point stand?

 

[luuk]

That is actually correct, I wasn't thinking about those groups and was rather on the marginalized ones. The point of epigenetics being a useless argument still stands though.

I haven’t read whatever you were arguing about before but if its wrt epigenetics affecting development in offspring it can occur for generations even after the stressor is removed & even if they don’t alter gene sequence

Research the dutch hunger winter or india in general, the effects lasted for generations as epigenetic markers persisted, affecting gene expression

 

[HundredManSlayer]

You cannot believe both as what I was implying was contradictory.

Do you believe only the nutrient content matters or should we only eat non "goyslop?" You could make the claim of animal foods being the most nutrient dense but you could get the nutrient content needed with "goyslop" too, so where does the point stand?

theres a clear distinction here

its not only nutrient content but also macros matter as well in my opinion, majority of calories must come from fat and protein

no goyslop has the "nutrients" needed unless you mean supplementation, and supplementation is fake synthetic vitamins and minerals often derived from toxic substances that dont even work. take most vitamin d3 supplements are derived from cholecalciferol, which is literally used as rat poison, but yeah sure you can get the "nutrients" you need from supplements lol

 

[topology]

I haven’t read whatever you were arguing about before but if its wrt epigenetics affecting development in offspring it can occur for generations even after the stressor is removed & even if they don’t alter gene sequence

Research the dutch hunger winter or india in general, the effects lasted for generations as epigenetic markers persisted, affecting gene expression

Epigenetic effects, such as those observed after the Dutch Hunger Winter, can influence offspring for a few generations. However, they do not permanently alter the DNA or create long-term population-level adaptations. Differences in diet tolerance between populations, such as lactose digestion, are primarily the result of genetic evolution rather than temporary epigenetic marks. Epigenetic changes also weaken over generations and are heavily influenced by the environment, so they are not a reliable mechanism for “stomach adaptation” across populations. Claiming that different tribes have stomachs adapted to specific foods is scientifically inaccurate, as the stomach is largely the same across humans, and adaptation occurs through enzymes, metabolism, and gut microbiomes rather than epigenetics alone.

The Dutch Hunger Winter, for example, was caused by caloric deprivation rather than the type of food consumed. Even if people had eaten nutritionally ideal foods at the average caloric levels of the time, proper development would still have been compromised.

Most epigenetic effects occur during pregnancy and very early development. These changes tend to be more stable than those acquired later in life, but they are often reversible and influenced by environmental factors.

TLDR; epigenetics can often be reversed + don't play a major role.

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

parentcels

 

[orthognathic]

This really is the true meaning of goyslop

Feeding yourself and the future slaves slop

Cucking their health and development

I’ve seen pregnant women eat goyslop

Infuriates me your son will grow up to be an incel ​

Diet is cope bro. As long as you’re chewing a lot and having good posture habits your face will develop the same way as if you were eating carnivore.

 

[topology]

its not only nutrient content but also macros matter as well in my opinion, majority of calories must come from fat and protein

Macros don’t strongly determine height because growth depends primarily on total calories, sufficient protein, and essential micronutrients, not the exact balance of carbs, fats, and protein. Carbs and fats mainly provide energy and hormone support, so as long as overall nutrition is adequate, the specific macro ratio has little effect on how tall you grow.

I asked ChatGPT to predict how much it thought the height difference with the normal US citizen macro ratio vs the idealized ratio would be and it said less than 1cm.

 

[HundredManSlayer]

sufficient protein

yes so you concede that macros do strongly affect height

ChatGPT

wow chatgpt? yeah im sure thats the most reliable source, good job

 

[acm]

i love goyslop, i feed myself the goy

so tasty

 

[topology]

yes so you concede that macros do strongly affect height

That wasn't the argument. I stated adequate protein could be obtained from "slop." You stated that's not possible. You've now conceded on my point.

wow chatgpt? yeah im sure thats the most reliable source, good job

Please be my guest and attach sources proving that the macro ratio changes your height proportionally. Indirect correlations can once again be bypassed with "slop."