who are the pit bulls?
Do I even have to say it
-jew
Ok Rajesh.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/
Why Humans Do Not Have Biological Races
Did you know that race in humans has no biological basis? In this text, we discuss the scientific evidence that shows...www.labxchange.org
Believing in race is like believing in the easter bunny.
FST doesnt define subspecies and wolf coyote fst doesnt replicate
academic.oup.com
Not even close.
my point is is that the races arent similar at all, it doesnt matter whether they can race mix or notFST doesnt define subspecies and wolf coyote fst doesnt replicate
Subspecies is also a made up social contruct that isnt used anymore xD
wolf coyotes fst = 0.3Tracing Eastern Wolf Origins From Whole-Genome Data in Context of Extensive Hybridization
Abstract. Southeastern Canada is inhabited by an amalgam of hybridizing wolf-like canids, raising fundamental questions regarding their taxonomy, origins,
“Less than 15% of all human genetic diversity is accounted for by differences between human groups!“
Nah it's all about skull
human races aren't genetically distinct enough to be subspecies. The lowest FST estimate subspecies are higher than FST of human races, and subspecies is an arbitrary construct xD
terrifyingly simple
what a retard lol.
Yes, they are. The differences don't have to be huge in order to categorise a new sub species. The human races have various morphological and mental differences due to adaptation to different ecological niches.
False again. The human races differ in life history. Rushton's research proved this. Free will doesn't exist. It implies we had a choice to exist when none of us did.
if human races are subspecies then many more animals of the same subspecies would be considered different sub species. What is that point of that xD we have the term race already
All twin/adoption studies prove is people copy the behavior of people who look like them. People follow their stereotypes.Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
even if genetics didnt play a role enviroment moves equally to genes unless you enforce draconian measures to prevent cultural exchange
Tabula rasa is definitively true and free will is real
The differences aren't large enough to categorise them as such.
In order for you to disprove it as an invalid construct, you must disprove Evolutionary Theory. Where's your evidence? I want you to disprove it in theory, too.
Hahaha. No, it's not. It has been disproven many times over.
False again. Differences in behaviour are down to the human races evolving to different environmental pressures hence the differing life history strategies.
sub species is not a valid construct
Human brain structure proportions can't be genetically selected for, hence human races having identical genetic brain proportions despite being "genetically different by a lot" xD. "Behaviour" can't be genetically selected for because it doesn't exist in the physical. There is nothing to "select for"
It makes perfect logical sense, actually. Morphological changes to the climate and removal of said subspecies from said niche can be disasterous for them.
Life history theory disproves your notion that behaviour isn't at least somewhat genetically inclined. Rushton's work proves it is at least 50% genetic the differences in life history.
Allele variants have been linked to superior cognitive ability.
Differences in brain and bodily health are a predictable measure of total genetic burden. Which in turn shapes the life history of person or group who're in linkage disequilibrium.
My reaction to that information
Yeah, like it matters.
