I have a theory about inceldom

[Deleted member 14699]

I think that attractive people has less genome mutations and that is good for the human specimen.

That's why incels have more genome mutations and why women reject them. Being short is bad for the specimen. Being bald, having deformities...

 

[St.TikTokcel]

I think that attractive people has less genome mutations and that is good for the human specimen.

That's why incels have more genome mutations and why women reject them. Being short is bad for the specimen. Being bald, having deformities...

Being ugly is definition of having a mutated DNA. Faulty, so to speak.

 

[Seth Walsh]

I think that attractive people has less genome mutations and that is good for the human specimen.

That's why incels have more genome mutations and why women reject them. Being short is bad for the specimen. Being bald, having deformities...

I don't think gene mutations mean bad features. For example, any non-brown eyes are due to a OCA2/HERC2 mutation

 

[Deleted member 39140]

it’s not complicated, just look nice. Nothing about this health bugdonaff shit

 

[Seth Walsh]

I don't think gene mutations mean bad features. For example, any non-brown eyes are due to a OCA2/HERC2 mutation

And differences in phenotypic physical traits don't arise due to mutated genes, just different genes.

 

[Deleted member 14699]

I don't think gene mutations mean bad features. For example, any non-brown eyes are due to a OCA2/HERC2 mutation

Well, mutations have positive, neutral or negative effects. But in my honest opinion bad features are in most cases produced by negative effect mutations. Idk if there are studies about that. But, for example, mutations at proangiogenetic factors can be the cause of some craneofacial development aberrations.

 

[Seth Walsh]

And differences in phenotypic physical traits don't arise due to mutated genes, just different genes.

But I see what you mean. Atypical genes are more likely to screw up your life, especially mental health predispositions etc. I feel like "correcting bad genes" will be a thing in the next 10 years, and it'll start with disease prevention, mental health prophylaxis etc... Then selecting preferential physical features will be a thing, and things will get messy

 

[Deleted member 14699]

But I see what you mean. Atypical genes are more likely to screw up your life, especially mental health predispositions etc. I feel like "correcting bad genes" will be a thing in the next 10 years, and it'll start with disease prevention, mental health prophylaxis etc... Then selecting preferential physical features will be a thing, and things will get messy

They will probably make a genetical profile of every human to see your predisposition to cancer and other genetical diseases. Having a polymorphism profile of every human could let us get into better treatments. But I think that's not possible to get at the Next 10 years... Imo 20-30 years for that and genome editing yo prevent diseases the Next 50 years.

It's actually possible to edite human genome but it's not known what genes are the responsible of bad/good features. But I can think that if u have a high expression of GH, GH receptor, IGF-1 and growth factors you will be probably tall, for example. Dunno if its as simple as that.

 

[Deleted member 25710]

Being ugly is definition of having a mutated DNA. Faulty, so to speak.

was stallone attractive?

 

[Deleted member 14699]

was stallone attractive?

Stallone was attractive, yes

 

[Deleted member 25710]

Stallone was attractive, yes

5'9, alpha frame, high iq, masc face, good facial averageness, good genes to reproduce
guy like him would never lose in this life

 

[Deleted member 14699]

5'9, alpha frame, high iq, masc face, good facial averageness, good genes to reproduce
guy like him would never lose in this life

So why do u ask if hes attactive

 

[DR. NICKGA]

Stupid theory, you are wrong

 

[Deleted member 14699]

Stupid theory, you are wrong

Why

 

[Geoff2024]

Being ugly is definition of having a mutated DNA. Faulty, so to speak.

idk why but i like your pfp

 

[Geoff2024]

I think that attractive people has less genome mutations and that is good for the human specimen.

That's why incels have more genome mutations and why women reject them. Being short is bad for the specimen. Being bald, having deformities...

sorry habibi but i must say water.

 

[mog_me]

I think that attractive people has less genome mutations and that is good for the human specimen.

That's why incels have more genome mutations and why women reject them. Being short is bad for the specimen. Being bald, having deformities...

Most features that people consider “attractive” are indicative of good health.

 

[Deleted member 14699]

Most features that people consider “attractive” are indicative of good health.

Good health = good genes = less mutations