I have found the dumbest people on earth

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

islam is the youtube shorts of religion

You claim that aseity (self-existence) is a property of the hypostasis (the person) not the essence (ousia). if the divine essence itself lacks aseity then it’s not worthy of being called "God" in the absolute sense. and if the essence has aseity but the son and spirit don’t possess it because...

looksmax.org

Muslims the Darwin award winners who knew following a 7th century caravan raider pedophile isn’t leads to low IQ


I single handedly slaughtered 5 Mohammedens on my own in this thread and tbh I don’t even feel proud you know why?

Because Muslims are so fucking retarded they think Monarchical trinitarianism ( what eastern Christian’s believe in and the church fathers and early Christian’s ) refutes the trinity because they state that the Son is lower in role than the father… yeah the son is lower than the father in role but not IN SUBSTANCE(Ontology/Existence) much like a prince is lower than a King in role but both are humans


Muslim arguments rely on strawmans and now they are unironically proving my religion to be true and the retards think they are refuting my religion by unironically stating what I belive.

@JasGews69x @emeraldglass @Basedman420 and the other 2 retards I forgot about. Learn what Christian’s belive in first before attacking our beliefs otherwise you’ll just be laughed out the room

 

[Shahnameh]

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

These guys make Gaytheists seem intelligent and that’s very very very worrying… I’d actually rather be an atheist than Muslim due to seeing how retarded the avg Muslim argument is @Swarthy Knight do my new list is Christianity Buddhism agnosticism atheism Islam Judaism then Hinduism

View attachment 3680392

Come on that’s not nice…. Schizophrenic's are better than that

 

[Sonneillon]

Get to sleep kiddo

 

[It'snotover]

 

[Swarthy Knight]

do my new list is Christianity Buddhism agnosticism atheism Islam Judaism then Hinduism

Islam over Judaism and Hinduism tho by a lot?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Islam over Judaism and Hinduism tho by a lot?

Barely over Judaism tbh


Only reason Islams over Judaism honestly is due to Muslims having an excuse that one being their gay faggot KOOORAN which likes to run from reality. The issue with Jews is that they read the same Bible the same Bible where their OWN prophets worship the “Angel of the lord” which calls himself YHWH and GOD. The same “Angel of the Lord” which btw isn’t an “Creature” angel but just the word of God, the same one who the Father says “My name is in him and he won’t forgive your sins” the same “Angel of the Lord” that forgives the sins in Zach 1:3-9

Point is Jews have less of an excuse to be pagans than Mohammedens.

Hinduism is just narrr bruh naaaaaahhhhhhhhh

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

@PsychoH @vevcred2_0 bumpooo

 

[childishkillah]

islam is the youtube shorts of religion

You claim that aseity (self-existence) is a property of the hypostasis (the person) not the essence (ousia). if the divine essence itself lacks aseity then it’s not worthy of being called "God" in the absolute sense. and if the essence has aseity but the son and spirit don’t possess it because...

looksmax.org

Muslims the Darwin award winners who knew following a 7th century caravan raider pedophile isn’t leads to low IQ


I single handedly slaughtered 5 Mohammedens on my own in this thread and tbh I don’t even feel proud you know why?

Because Muslims are so fucking retarded they think Monarchical trinitarianism ( what eastern Christian’s believe in and the church fathers and early Christian’s ) refutes the trinity because they state that the Son is lower in role than the father… yeah the son is lower than the father in role but not IN SUBSTANCE(Ontology/Existence) much like a prince is lower than a King in role but both are humans


Muslim arguments rely on strawmans and now they are unironically proving my religion to be true and the retards think they are refuting my religion by unironically stating what I belive.

@JasGews69x @emeraldglass @Basedman420 and the other 2 retards I forgot about. Learn what Christian’s belive in first before attacking our beliefs otherwise you’ll just be laughed out the room

Op is a nigger

 

[Nahil]

 

[Newday*V3]

Reading Dungeons and Dragons lore makes more sense than Religious ‘debates’

 

[Klasik616]

Keep coping with religion Jesus isn't here

 

[bakpaokukus]

abrahamic niggas try not to rape each other for one second challenge (impossible)

 

[Vultus Tui Res]

islam is the youtube shorts of religion

You claim that aseity (self-existence) is a property of the hypostasis (the person) not the essence (ousia). if the divine essence itself lacks aseity then it’s not worthy of being called "God" in the absolute sense. and if the essence has aseity but the son and spirit don’t possess it because...

looksmax.org

Muslims the Darwin award winners who knew following a 7th century caravan raider pedophile isn’t leads to low IQ


I single handedly slaughtered 5 Mohammedens on my own in this thread and tbh I don’t even feel proud you know why?

Because Muslims are so fucking retarded they think Monarchical trinitarianism ( what eastern Christian’s believe in and the church fathers and early Christian’s ) refutes the trinity because they state that the Son is lower in role than the father… yeah the son is lower than the father in role but not IN SUBSTANCE(Ontology/Existence) much like a prince is lower than a King in role but both are humans


Muslim arguments rely on strawmans and now they are unironically proving my religion to be true and the retards think they are refuting my religion by unironically stating what I belive.

@JasGews69x @emeraldglass @Basedman420 and the other 2 retards I forgot about. Learn what Christian’s belive in first before attacking our beliefs otherwise you’ll just be laughed out the room

Are you Orthodox Christian?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Are you Orthodox Christian?

Ofc the one true church.

 

[jeremyy]

islam is the youtube shorts of religion

You claim that aseity (self-existence) is a property of the hypostasis (the person) not the essence (ousia). if the divine essence itself lacks aseity then it’s not worthy of being called "God" in the absolute sense. and if the essence has aseity but the son and spirit don’t possess it because...

looksmax.org

Muslims the Darwin award winners who knew following a 7th century caravan raider pedophile isn’t leads to low IQ


I single handedly slaughtered 5 Mohammedens on my own in this thread and tbh I don’t even feel proud you know why?

Because Muslims are so fucking retarded they think Monarchical trinitarianism ( what eastern Christian’s believe in and the church fathers and early Christian’s ) refutes the trinity because they state that the Son is lower in role than the father… yeah the son is lower than the father in role but not IN SUBSTANCE(Ontology/Existence) much like a prince is lower than a King in role but both are humans


Muslim arguments rely on strawmans and now they are unironically proving my religion to be true and the retards think they are refuting my religion by unironically stating what I belive.

@JasGews69x @emeraldglass @Basedman420 and the other 2 retards I forgot about. Learn what Christian’s belive in first before attacking our beliefs otherwise you’ll just be laughed out the room

Sorry to burst you're bubble but all religious people are the dumbest.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Keep coping with religion Jesus isn't here

Still yet to disprove god

How’s your hunt for empirically evidencing logic ? The leads come back to me once your done measuring and finding logic empirically

Stupid GAYtheist

 

[Klasik616]

Still yet to disprove god

How’s your hunt for empirically evidencing logic ? The leads come back to me once your done measuring and finding logic empirically

Stupid GAYtheist

And you still have to convince me how religion copers think logically when faith is nothing to be proven logically and their belief is just guided by their emotions which you cannot explain with logic but only empirism, believing in a subject that doesn't exist in real life and cannot be proven empirically which is the first source of knowledge even said first by Aristotle and later modern empirists.

You haven't proved anything using logic, the proof of any knowledge we have relies firstly on senses. You can't ask me to disprove God, is like asking me to disprove that dragons existed.

Since your parents told you God exists you blindly accepted that idea without asking for a real life proof, like all the other knowledge comes from.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

View attachment 3681416

Not at all why we hate Jews @finnished

We hate them cos they hate God and have been nothing but ungrateful fucks for all of history. That’s why we hate them

And what you dickheads seem to not get is that 2nd temple Judaism is NOT THE SAME AS MODERN RABBINIC JUDAISM they are two different religions

And you still have to convince me how religion copers think logically when faith is nothing to be proven logically and their belief is just guided by their emotions which you cannot explain with logic but only empirism.

Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

I believe for there is evidence the GAYtheist meme of MUH blind faith is naught but an GAYthiest assertion keep them coming retard

I have an account for logic, it’s grounded in God (universal invariant abstract immaterial being) I have told you this numerous times and I won’t reiterate it here. In my paradigm logic can sensibly exist in your…. Well once again please empirically evidence that logic exists please and thank you.

Until then you can’t argue as your using things that LITERALLY cannot exist in your paradigm thank you and good bye

 

[Klasik616]

Not at all why we hate Jews @finnished

We hate them cos they hate God and have been nothing but ungrateful fucks for all of history. That’s why we hate them

And what you dickheads seem to not get is that 2nd temple Judaism is NOT THE SAME AS MODERN RABBINIC JUDAISM they are two different religions


Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

I believe for there is evidence the GAYtheist meme of MUH blind faith is naught but an GAYthiest assertion keep them coming retard

I have an account for logic, it’s grounded in God (universal invariant abstract immaterial being) I have told you this numerous times and I won’t reiterate it here. In my paradigm logic can sensibly exist in your…. Well once again please empirically evidence that logic exists please and thank you.

Until then you can’t argue as your using things that LITERALLY cannot exist in your paradigm thank you and good bye

Who told you logic can prove beings lol, any being you mention has firstly been through our senses. If there is an universal invariant of logical thinking that doesn't mean he is the God you religion copers talk about. I told you the other time that logic can't prove anything alone, it's just made to make arguments by the use of language and nothing else. Our actual knowledge doesn't come from logic but rather perception.

To make a meaningful sentence using logic you need empiric ideas first, how do you prove God this way? Otherwise logic would be math and not ontology, metaphysics fails when it talks about beings no one has ever seen. Ofc logic exists, if not how I'm writing this lol but that doesn't mean God exists. Believing in such thing is absurd if you compare to any other kind of knowledge you have (common sense).

 

[Nahil]

Not at all why we hate Jews @finnished

We hate them cos they hate God and have been nothing but ungrateful fucks for all of history. That’s why we hate them

Is that the good old "They're not the real jews, we are the real jews" cope

And what you dickheads seem to not get is that 2nd temple Judaism is NOT THE SAME AS MODERN RABBINIC JUDAISM they are two different religions

Are you gonna claim that they worship the devil (like the muslims) or that they worshipped the trinity before the temple was destroyed jfl

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Who told you logic can prove beings lol, any being you mention has firstly been through our senses. If there is an universal invariant of logical thinking that doesn't mean he is the God you religion copers talk about. I told you the other time that logic can't prove anything alone, it's just made to make arguments by the use of language and nothing else. Our actual knowledge doesn't come from logic but rather perception.

To make a meaningful sentence using logic you need empiric ideas first, how do you prove God this way? Otherwise logic would be math and not ontology, metaphysics fails when it talks about beings no one has ever seen. Ofc logic exist, if not how I'm writing this lol but that doesn't mean God exists. Believing in such thing is absurd if you compare to any other kind of knowledge (common sense).

I never said logic proves “beings” I said god is a necessary precondition for logic…


Wait how do you know what knowledge is? is? How can you even account for knowledge when that requires there to be objective truth and falsehood how can you as an GAYtheist assertion your stimuli which are based on random neurological chemical firing coming to grant you truth when the human body was designed for survival not truth and yes part of that includes delusion. So why and how can you justifiably account for what you see being what you interpret it to be what if your minds imparting information on an object to make you think it’s the way it is? What if we are all just having mental phantasms as Rene Descartes said (he’s also a GAYtheist like you and he acknowledges this at least)

To “know” something implies an knower something you cannot verify or account for once again

Like the typical GAYthiest faggot you are you bekive in things you can’t reasonably justify as existing which throws your whole belief system into being illogical

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Is that the good old "They're not the real jews, we are the real jews" cope



Are you gonna claim that they worship the devil (like the muslims) or that they worshipped the trinity before the temple was destroyed jfl

I already evidenced that ancient Jews believed god was Triune the Angel of the Lord acts as god is called god and worshipped as god and called YHWH the Holy Spirit is referred to as God etc. yes they worshipped god if you think the trinity is something Christian’s invented then like the Muslims your also a fucking dumbass

Everything else you said was so fucking ridiculous I won’t reply to it seek help idiot

 

[Klasik616]

I never said logic proves “beings” I said god is a necessary precondition for logic…


Wait how do you know what knowledge is? is? How can you even account for knowledge when that requires there to be objective truth and falsehood how can you as an GAYtheist assertion your stimuli which are based on random neurological chemical firing coming to grant you truth when the human body was designed for survival not truth and yes part of that includes delusion. So why and how can you justifiably account for what you see being what you interpret it to be what if your minds imparting information on an object to make you think it’s the way it is? What if we are all just having mental phantasms as Rene Descartes said (he’s also a GAYtheist like you and he acknowledges this at least)

To “know” something implies an knower something you cannot verify or account for once again

Like the typical GAYthiest faggot you are you bekive in things you can’t reasonably justify as existing which throws your whole belief system into being illogical

You are confused because your philosophy is too classic and dated. What I told you is, any knowledge comes from perception (Almost all philosophers agree except Descartes and Spinoza which are dumb idiots) first, then it is organized by logic (ofc if it wasnt put in the right place how would we be cappable to make differences between objects), this is kantianism the only solution that ever existed to the problem of empirism and rationalism. If you want to prove God you need both (you can't) this is why I say he is not a being. In the study of logic, we study the logic of language (why we type the arguments like this) not God. This is a completely atheist philosophy, I don't include causality either because that's used for ontology and since the study of logic is not about beings we don't need it anymore.

 

[Sonneillon]

I never said logic proves “beings” I said god is a necessary precondition for logic…


Wait how do you know what knowledge is? is? How can you even account for knowledge when that requires there to be objective truth and falsehood how can you as an GAYtheist assertion your stimuli which are based on random neurological chemical firing coming to grant you truth when the human body was designed for survival not truth and yes part of that includes delusion. So why and how can you justifiably account for what you see being what you interpret it to be what if your minds imparting information on an object to make you think it’s the way it is? What if we are all just having mental phantasms as Rene Descartes said (he’s also a GAYtheist like you and he acknowledges this at least)

To “know” something implies an knower something you cannot verify or account for once again

Like the typical GAYthiest faggot you are you bekive in things you can’t reasonably justify as existing which throws your whole belief system into being illogical

@princeluencour becomes your favourite user when you realise he has godly sarcasm

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You are confused because your philosophy is too classic and dated. What I told you is, any knowledge comes from perception (Almost all philosophers agree except Descartes and Spinoza which are dumb idiots) first, then it is organized by logic (ofc if it wasnt put in the right place how would we be cappable to make differences between objects), this is kantianism the only solution that ever existed to the problem of empirism and rationalism. If you want to prove God you need both (you can't) this is why I say he is not a being. In the study of logic, we study the logic of language (why we type the arguments like this) not God. This is a completely atheist philosophy, I don't include causality either because that's used for ontology and since the study of logic is not about beings we don't need it anymore.

How can you account for your perception being true reflection of truth and logic once again you cannot

Classical foundationalism leads to everybody just presupposing what they want which means you cannot even argue against religion because that means my own view offend mentor view are both equally valid… fucking moron

Do this now or fuck off, give me a shit reply again and I’ll put you on my ignore

 

[Klasik616]

I never said logic proves “beings” I said god is a necessary precondition for logic…


Wait how do you know what knowledge is? is? How can you even account for knowledge when that requires there to be objective truth and falsehood how can you as an GAYtheist assertion your stimuli which are based on random neurological chemical firing coming to grant you truth when the human body was designed for survival not truth and yes part of that includes delusion. So why and how can you justifiably account for what you see being what you interpret it to be what if your minds imparting information on an object to make you think it’s the way it is? What if we are all just having mental phantasms as Rene Descartes said (he’s also a GAYtheist like you and he acknowledges this at least)

To “know” something implies an knower something you cannot verify or account for once again

Like the typical GAYthiest faggot you are you bekive in things you can’t reasonably justify as existing which throws your whole belief system into being illogical

How can you account for your perception being true reflection of truth and logic once again you cannot

Classical foundationalism leads to everybody just presupposing what they want which means you cannot even argue against religion because that means my own view offend mentor view are both equally valid… fucking moron

Do this now or fuck off, give me a shit reply again and I’ll put you on my ignore

Are you implying logic can justify existence? WTF no, that has even been debunked in the middle age. Existence has nothing to do with logic, I consider any being as existent when I can retain it with any of my senses and give it a name, otherwise is just a blind idea found on nothing at all like God. God cannot be a first belief, the belief of God is anti-natural and a-posteriori, no empiric influx makes you think a creator exists but rather logic but still he is not a being for the reasons I mentioned before. Denying empirism would lead to a mental disease like denying people, the sun, the wind, weights, smells, feelings and so on. Older civilizations had more common sense than you because they believed nature was made of Gods. You are lossing the argument and trying to deny how knowledge works.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Are you implying logic can justify existence? WTF no, that has even been debunked in the middle age. Existence has nothing to do with logic, I consider any being as existent when I can retain it with any of my senses and give it a name, otherwise is just a blind idea found on nothing at all like God. God cannot be a first belief, the belief of God is anti-natural and a-posteriori, no empiric influx makes you think a creator exists but rather logic but still he is not a being for the reasons I mentioned before. Denying empirism would lead to a mental disease like denying people, the sun, the wind, weights, smells, feelings exist.

Ok right into my ignore you go… you still failed and never bothered to even give an justified true belief account of how you come to know things and what logic is

Existence isn’t just what you can sniff, touch, or slap a name on we both know this isn’t true. You’re saying numbers don’t exist? Laws of logic? Your own argument’s coherence? None of that’s tickling your senses, yet you’re leaning on it to chat shit. This is why I humiliate you every time we engage and you always look like a fucking imbecile go run off to GPT go bail you out fucker

Medieval? Are you a donut this why your going on my ignore, name me A SINGLE medieval philosopher which said logics got no play in metaphysics you fucking retarded bitch

The thiestic arguments start with the worldmotion, causality, contingency and reason to a first cause. That’s not some post-hoc fanfic; it’s grounded in what’s right in front of you. You’re acting like humanity’s default was atheism, but check the receipts every culture from Mesopotamia to Mesoamerica leaned theistic. God-belief ain’t “anti-natural”; it’s baked into the human condition. Your take’s the outlier, not the other way around.

Nobody’s saying empiricism is even bad I learn about my religion from reading using empirical dense data I’m simply asking the questions as to WHY and HOW they exist the way they do why is it even here and exists in the way it does, your a low tier troglodyte who worships sense data like some cretin in 1st grade philosophy class sit tf down and learn. I mean what about meaning purpose intentjon identity, what your gonna smell those into existence you cretin ? Your whole worldview is incomplete and you demonstrated it the moment you leave sniffing the sunflower petals in the air your paradigm is exposed as the low IQ shit it is

 

[Klasik616]

Ok right into my ignore you go… you still failed and never bothered to even give an justified true belief account of how you come to know things and what logic is

Existence isn’t just what you can sniff, touch, or slap a name on we both know this isn’t true. You’re saying numbers don’t exist? Laws of logic? Your own argument’s coherence? None of that’s tickling your senses, yet you’re leaning on it to chat shit. This is why I humiliate you every time we engage and you always look like a fucking imbecile go run off to GPT go bail you out fucker

Medieval? Are you a donut this why your going on my ignore, name me A SINGLE medieval philosopher which said logics got no play in metaphysics you fucking retarded bitch

The thiestic arguments start with the worldmotion, causality, contingency and reason to a first cause. That’s not some post-hoc fanfic; it’s grounded in what’s right in front of you. You’re acting like humanity’s default was atheism, but check the receipts every culture from Mesopotamia to Mesoamerica leaned theistic. God-belief ain’t “anti-natural”; it’s baked into the human condition. Your take’s the outlier, not the other way around.

Nobody’s saying empiricism is even bad I learn about my religion from reading using empirical dense data I’m simply asking the questions as to WHY and HOW they exist the way they do why is it even here and exists in the way it does, your a low tier troglodyte who worships sense data like some cretin in 1st grade philosophy class sit tf down and learn. I mean what about meaning purpose intentjon identity, what your gonna smell those into existence you cretin ? Your whole worldview is incomplete and you demonstrated it the moment you leave sniffing the sunflower petals in the air your paradigm is exposed as the low IQ shit it is

There is no such thing as causality and end in nature, this is also compatible with science. Put an example if you can, the theistic aristotelian philosophy crumbled the moment they asked for the meaning of beings and even more when they introduced causality to explain the apparent movement of a "complete system working thanks to the first cause". Again existence of beings are not founded in logic but perception, like any subject. Math is not about beings, numbers are a kind of language that signal quantities not qualities. Qualities are what we call "meaning" and they are unlogical, while numbers are meaningless but logical.

Philosophy is not about creating a "whole idea of how the world works", there are many philosophies not just theistic-classic ones which are dated and I could defy any of the principles you mention using Kant and Wittgenstein works. I'm a empirist who believes in common sense and you are a narcissist. Perception + logic is knowledge but you can't prove that a being exists using only logical arguments.

 

[Nahil]

I already evidenced that ancient Jews believed god was Triune the Angel of the Lord acts as god is called god and worshipped as god and called YHWH the Holy Spirit is referred to as God etc. yes they worshipped god if you think the trinity is something Christian’s invented then like the Muslims your also a fucking dumbass

Everything else you said was so fucking ridiculous I won’t reply to it seek help idiot

Every act of reading is an act of interpretation, you make claims which all jews today can refute and they can make claims which you can refute.

Fictious realities can be interpreted in millions different ways, you guys are just the more pathetic bunch, trying to larp as some of the people you hate the most.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Every act of reading is an act of interpretation, you make claims which all jews today can refute and they can make claims which you can refute.

Fictious realities can be interpreted in millions different ways, you guys are just the more pathetic bunch, trying to larp as some of the people you hate the most.

I have refuted their claims they cannot make claims to refute mine. Literally go read the Bible study both sources and make your own decision on which group sounds more logical. Jews literally had to create a entire new religion 200-500 years after Jesus to cope with the major L they took losing most of their followers to Christianity the reminders created their own fan fiction and haven’t gotten over the L today

Also what you said is a fallacy, so what if every act of reading has biases or interpretations that doesn’t prevent one from acquiring truth now does it… you examine the claims and the more plausible one wins out. Christianity is in line with the prophets, Judaism isn’t and is instead an ethnic gay cult

Christian’s don’t even hate Jews like that anymore we just think they are retarded. Jews are the ones that despise us so much they dedicate entire chapters to speaking about how Christians, Jesus and Mary will be punished in hell

 

[Nahil]

Jews literally had to create a entire new religion 200-500 years after Jesus to cope with the major L they took losing most of their followers to Christianity the reminders created their own fan fiction and haven’t gotten over the L today

That's an insane claim bruv lmao, r u implying that they "created" a new religion when they started writing the talmud?

Christian’s don’t even hate Jews like that anymore we just think they are retarded. Jews are the ones that despise us so much they dedicate entire chapters to speaking about how Christians, Jesus and Mary will be punished in hell

Yeah but they hate him for mocking the words of the sages and not doing enough for israel, they wanted a conquering messiah (which they did get in the end) they might hate jesus but they loved the fact that through christianity (and later islam) majority of the world is now acknowledging if not worshipping their god.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

That's an insane claim bruv lmao, r u implying that they "created" a new religion when they started writing the talmud?


Yeah but they hate him for mocking the words of the sages and not doing enough for israel, they wanted a conquering messiah (which they did get in the end) they might hate jesus but they loved the fact that through christianity (and later islam) majority of the world is now acknowledging if not worshipping their god.

Christianity is literally older than rabbinic Judaism… if you’re too fucking lazy to do a simple google search why are you even replying to me

I swear users on this form are a special kind of retard.

They WANTED a conquering messiah despite the OLD TESTAMENT SPEAKING ABIUT A SUFFERING MESSIAH their own fucking rabbis such as Rashi admit this in Isiah 53 being about Meshiach Ben Yosef. Those idiots have 2 messiahs the conquering one and the suffering one.

Jews are not happy with Christianity one but they don’t even consider Christian’s to worship the same God as them (and I agree we worship the God of the prophets Jews worship an abomination they don’t even know) Islam is a joke an Arab pagan religion that liked Christianity and Judaism and decided to copy paste what was in both like a failed fan fiction.

As I said I have read Jewish sources but here’s a good video watching a Jewish man who is very well trained as a “Anti missionary” yes that’s what they are called and what the Jews train them to be



Watch the Jew being refuted using his own sources and forced to acknowledge that Jesus is God lmfao no wonder Jews hate us we are their kryptonite

 

[Nahil]

Christianity is literally older than rabbinic Judaism… if you’re too fucking lazy to do a simple google search why are you even replying to me

Your claim that it isn't a continuation of what the jooz had before the temple fell, but instead was something that they just came up with to disprove christianity is insane.

They WANTED a conquering messiah despite the OLD TESTAMENT SPEAKING ABIUT A SUFFERING MESSIAH their own fucking rabbis such as Rashi admit this in Isiah 53 being about Meshiach Ben Yosef. Those idiots have 2 messiahs the conquering one and the suffering one.

Rashi's interpretation on isiah 53 is that Israel is the suffering servant

Jews are not happy with Christianity one but they don’t even consider Christian’s to worship the same God as them (and I agree we worship the God of the prophets Jews worship an abomination they don’t even know) Islam is a joke an Arab pagan religion that liked Christianity and Judaism and decided to copy paste what was in both like a failed fan fiction.

Maimonides on christianity and islam, despite being false he still believed them to be a part of "god's plan"

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Your claim that it isn't a continuation of what the jooz had before the temple fell, but instead was something that they just came up with to disprove christianity is insane.


Rashi's interpretation on isiah 53 is that Israel is the suffering servant


View attachment 3681962
Maimonides on christianity and islam, despite being false he still believed them to be a part of "god's plan"

Well my reasoning is because as I’ll show you below the Jews had to reinterpret their entire religion and create a NEW RELGION to counter Christianity…. That proves what I mean I mean modern rabbinic Judaism only finished developing in the 12 hundreds considering they ended up adding many platonic gnostic nonsense for their Mystisism during that time. Look up the Babylonian Talmud and other sources and you’ll see what we call “Judaism” began to be formed in 2 separate pockets one in the 3rd century and the other in the 6th century

So yes Christianity is closer to it than this shit attempt to corrupt the RELGION. When it takes the highest IQ GROUP 500 YEARS TRIP MENTAL GYMNASTICS THEIR WAY INTO A NEW RELGION YOU KNOW YOU CANT TAKE IT SRS

You have to understand mymonidies is ONE MAN. The rabbis are very clear in their Talmud what they think about Jesus but I’ll admit the view on him differs from person to person. The same way some Christian’s say Muslims worship the same god as them and others like me Say they don’t.


That having beeen said I admire you bringing up Mymonidies

Rashi states Isreal is the suffering servant but he also states zach 12:10 to be the suffering servant specifically Messiah ben Joseph, a figure in some Jewish traditions who suffers and dies in battle before the triumphant Messiah ben David. In his commentary on Sukkah 52a (Talmud), Rashi links Zechariah 12:10 to Messiah ben Joseph’s death, saying the mourning is for this slain figure.

Before Rashi, some Jewish texts (Targum Jonathan, Ruth Rabbah, Sanhedrin 98b) did link Isaiah 53 and other verses to a Messiah, sometimes suffering (e.g., Messiah ben Joseph). For example, Ruth Rabbah (mid-first millennium) cites Isaiah 53:5 as Messianic, and Tanhuma (ninth century) quotes Isaiah 52:13 similarly. WHICH PROVES MY POINT THAT THEIR RELIGION JS A REACTIONARY RESPONSE TO CHRISTIANITY.

Ironically every cult you see is literally a reaction to Christianity. Mormonism Judaism Islam Jehovah witnesses etc all built as a response to the one true faith. This is an attestation to the power of the one true faith Christianity

 

[finnished]

Not at all why we hate Jews @finnished

We hate them cos they hate God and have been nothing but ungrateful fucks for all of history. That’s why we hate them

And what you dickheads seem to not get is that 2nd temple Judaism is NOT THE SAME AS MODERN RABBINIC JUDAISM they are two different religions


Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

I believe for there is evidence the GAYtheist meme of MUH blind faith is naught but an GAYthiest assertion keep them coming retard

I have an account for logic, it’s grounded in God (universal invariant abstract immaterial being) I have told you this numerous times and I won’t reiterate it here. In my paradigm logic can sensibly exist in your…. Well once again please empirically evidence that logic exists please and thank you.

Until then you can’t argue as your using things that LITERALLY cannot exist in your paradigm thank you and good bye

I didn't agree with that picture. I just JFL'led it because it was a bit funny.

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

islam is the youtube shorts of religion

You claim that aseity (self-existence) is a property of the hypostasis (the person) not the essence (ousia). if the divine essence itself lacks aseity then it’s not worthy of being called "God" in the absolute sense. and if the essence has aseity but the son and spirit don’t possess it because...

looksmax.org

Muslims the Darwin award winners who knew following a 7th century caravan raider pedophile isn’t leads to low IQ


I single handedly slaughtered 5 Mohammedens on my own in this thread and tbh I don’t even feel proud you know why?

Because Muslims are so fucking retarded they think Monarchical trinitarianism ( what eastern Christian’s believe in and the church fathers and early Christian’s ) refutes the trinity because they state that the Son is lower in role than the father… yeah the son is lower than the father in role but not IN SUBSTANCE(Ontology/Existence) much like a prince is lower than a King in role but both are humans


Muslim arguments rely on strawmans and now they are unironically proving my religion to be true and the retards think they are refuting my religion by unironically stating what I belive.

@JasGews69x @emeraldglass @Basedman420 and the other 2 retards I forgot about. Learn what Christian’s belive in first before attacking our beliefs otherwise you’ll just be laughed out the room

But we can adopt a few of their practices before annihilating them into oblivion.

One, make women wear puffy dresses, or they get the back of the hand.

Two, make women cover their faces with masks or they get the back of the hand.

Three, make women shut the fuck up or they'll get the back of the hand.

Four, restrict women from leadership and authoritarian roles, and if they try to apply for such positions,