
psychomandible
π―ππ― ππππ - ππππππππππππππ
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2024
- Posts
- 10,922
- Reputation
- 20,081
Explains why I've always hated turks ever since I first heard about them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You're going to have to be abit more specific when you say my people bro...Because the Turks cucked ur people?
You're going to have to be abit more specific when you say my people bro...
tatars didn't conquer shit nigga
tatars didn't conquer shit nigga
they can thank the mongols for thatRussia was a vassal state of the Golden Horde a Tatar (Kypchak Turkic) empire
View attachment 3588793
Theres also the Time the Tatars set Moscow on Fire
![]()
Fire of Moscow (1571) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
they can thank the mongols for that
Turks of Anatolia arenβt the same as ighuz Turks
russians weren't a thing though, tt that time, russia was not a unitary stateRussia was a vassal state of the Golden Horde a Tatar (Kypchak Turkic) empire
View attachment 3588793
Theres also the Time the Tatars set Moscow on Fire
![]()
Fire of Moscow (1571) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Turks of Anatolia arenβt the same as ighuz Turks
russians weren't a thing though, tt that time, russia was not a unitary state
Anatolian Turks are genetically not TurkicSeljuk
Turks
View attachment 3588834
Kievan rus and thr other russian principalities were made into vassals and tributaries for their Turko Mongol lords.
Anatolian Turks are genetically not Turkic
there was no kievan rus back thenSeljuk
Turks
View attachment 3588834
Kievan rus and thr other russian principalities were made into vassals and tributaries for their Turko Mongol lords.
there was no kievan rus back then
then there were only principalities that were at odds with each other, although Novgorod (the main one) was not a vassal
Barely significant
yeah read this, educate yourself![]()
Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org