i need to think more about the possible and the impossible

[_MVP_]

so in my opinion logical impossibilities within a certain ruleframe do exist.

however if u manage to break the rules/alter the ruleframe (if possible) things become possible.

 

[_MVP_]

gpt's answer:

Yeah, that makes sense. Within a given ruleframe, some things are logically impossible—like squaring a circle in Euclidean geometry or dividing by zero in arithmetic. But if you shift the ruleframe—like moving to non-Euclidean geometry or redefining division—you can make things possible that were previously impossible.


The real question is: How much control do we have over the ruleframe itself? In some areas (e.g., business, social structures, or even physics if tech advances far enough), we can bend or rewrite the rules. In other areas, like pure logic or certain laws of physics, the ruleframe seems more rigid.


Are you thinking about this in a general sense or in relation to something specific?