high gonial angle means downward grown jaw = recessed maxilla = ugly
No you don't understand, gonial angle takes into account how diagonal the ramus is. I haven't seen any explanation on why that would be so important.
Depends on the person which suits them
But there are people with ideal plane angle and a high gonial angle, it's not that uncommon atleast from my experience. I originally got this from thecel's thread, i understand that gonial angle is easier, i use it too.
Yeah, but i mean it makes sense, i used to think that bigonial width is where the masseter muscle sits too. And i think it's pretty hard to discern where exactly the bigonial width should be measured, especially if a person doesn't have insane angularity/leanness in the area.
ye gonial angle is completely useless and doesnt translate to front and zenis canthal tilt esr is optimal with 20mm pfl
and this guy doesnt understand, gonial angle takes into account how diagonal (
) the ramus is.
This on the red line is what matters how steep your jaw is in front profile (along with width chin etc..)
? MPA and GA are always highly correlated, shit growth will rape the ramus and thus the body
Yeah but i've seen many faces with sub-ideal gonial angles and ideal mpas. Lorenzo is a good popular example, gonial angle 130+ but ideal mpa and jfa
Ah ok i saw a video of him by faceiq he had him at 130+ somehow, i'll try measuring myself and finding other examples, unfortunately i always delete the pictures off my phone when i'm done measuring someone
I think faceIQ was in the right here, here's the best side profile pic where his jaw is somewhat defined, it's 130+ here, you can try it yourself It's hard to find defined pics of him so i think the submental tricked you
Show me the ear in the pic also so I can see where the tragus is the middle part of the ear where TMJ sits
@thecel
It's ideal stop worrying about it. It's really ideal
Okay great
