I think a more interesting battle would be 100 men vs 1 grizzly bear

[itzyaboyJJ]

This is even more brutal than the gorilla one, without any tools the only way would be to tire it until it eventually gives up.

But bears are even more vicious, agile and stronger than a gorilla, just it’s claws alone are intimidating.

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

@666PSL @Bars @isegrim314 @kebinGarnett @Swarthy Knight

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

Let Me Get A Headlock Its Wraps

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

100 is a ton of guys

Definitely way more brutal than gorilla but I think humans might still win if they get any sort of chance to strategize

At least 40-50 are dying tho

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

100 is a ton of guys

Definitely way more brutal than gorilla but I think humans might still win if they get any sort of chance to strategize

At least 40-50 are dying tho

When you put it into perspective

It’s really not that much, for reference this is 100 people, if all the men are blood lusted with no survival instincts then it’s possible, but the men we have in this generation just won’t get the job done .

 

[Jason Voorhees]

There's no chance if it's grizzly. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional maybe against a black bear but grizzlies/polar bears are too big and dangerous even dog piling such a huge animal would be difficult

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

There's no chance if it's grizzly. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional maybe against a black bear but grizzlies/polar bears are too big and dangerous.

View attachment 3697771View attachment 3697772View attachment 3697769View attachment 3697775

Exactly, I wasn’t even gonna bring up polar bears cause they are even more dangerous and stronger . You would probably need like over 100 men for that

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

When you put it into perspective
View attachment 3697768
It’s really not that much, for reference this is 100 people, if all the men are blood lusted with no survival instincts then it’s possible, but the men we have in this generation just won’t get the job done .

true

I think it depends a ton on the terrain and rules of the fight

Like if the humans get any time to make a strategy or if they just get dropped in

If they just get dropped in and sent into battle immediately it's over.

 

[The Homelander]

100 greycels vs itzyaboyjj

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

true

I think it depends a ton on the terrain and rules of the fight

Like if the humans get any time to make a strategy or if they just get dropped in

If they just get dropped in and sent into battle immediately it's over.

But like you said Atleast half are dying, that’s the problem the men need to be blood lusted with zero fear to take down the bear.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Exactly, I wasn’t even gonna bring up polar bears cause they are even more dangerous and stronger . You would probably need like over 100 men for that

Even with guns it is very difficult to hunt grizzlies. You can ask any hunter @TonyDr and they'd tell you grizzlies can keep charging at you and take multiple bullets before goinf down. Their skulls are so thick, lower caliber bullets simply ricochet off. There's a reason why people use ammo the size of their hands .338 Win Mag etc to take down bears

 

[batman1997]

The thing is im not an ordinary human

 

[isegrim314]

I think 100 unarmed humans vs an adult tiger would be a more balanced but still brutal fight

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

There's no chance if it's grizzly. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional maybe against a black bear but grizzlies/polar bears are too big and dangerous even dog piling such a huge animal would be difficult

View attachment 3697771View attachment 3697772View attachment 3697769View attachment 3697775

Their size is hugely variable

I've been around some (not wild ofc) irl and they were definitely big but most were a little underwhelming

I did see some huge ones though

 

[Swarthy Knight]

Just wait til the bear calls for backup tho

 

[batman1997]

I think 100 unarmed humans vs an adult tiger would be a more balanced but still brutal fight

Tigers are one of the most strongest felines on earth your joking right?

 

[isegrim314]

Tigers are one of the most strongest felines on earth your joking right?

I think 100 humans could win though with a very high number of deaths. A bear is impossible

 

[Yliaster]

There's no chance if it's grizzly. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional maybe against a black bear but grizzlies/polar bears are too big and dangerous even dog piling such a huge animal would be difficult

View attachment 3697771View attachment 3697772View attachment 3697769View attachment 3697775

Fair point and I agree to an extent.Although I believe that if a Grizzly were to be rampaged simultaneously by
a dozen or so men their Brains would probably not be able to process what is happening and who knows what
might happen ? Keep in mind Animals are not as Conscious or analytical as Humans are and aren't used to unpredictability
i.e. being rampaged by dozens+ of humans and are oftentimes not able to process what is happening.During this
frenzy while the Bear is overwhelmed/confused I suppose the men can use that brief opportunity to gouge its eyes
or something.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Their size is hugely variable

I've been around some (not wild ofc) irl and they were definitely big but most were a little underwhelming

I did see some huge ones though

Bears in the mainland U.S. typically don’t grow as large. The biggest ones are found in coastal regions of Alaska and British Columbia where there is abundance of food 3hich allows them to reach massive sizes. The largest of all live on Kodiak Island Kodiak bears, a subspecies of grizzly. which grow even bigger than their mainland relatives.

 

[back/forward]

I remember seeing a news story about a Russian boxer killing a bear with a knife. He managed to shoot btw, but then he started fighting the bear with a knife. I'd rather die, because the guy later became a sub5.


Obviously 100 people would win against anyone.

 

[batman1997]

View attachment 3697763
This is even more brutal than the gorilla one, without any tools the only way would be to tire it until it eventually gives up.

But bears are even more vicious, agile and stronger than a gorilla, just it’s claws alone are intimidating.

I think i can hold my ground against It not saying i would win though

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

100 indians vs bonnie blue

 

[playxiing]

100 is a ton of guys

Definitely way more brutal than gorilla but I think humans might still win if they get any sort of chance to strategize

At least 40-50 are dying tho

we are not in anime nigga

 

[back/forward]

When you put it into perspective
View attachment 3697768
It’s really not that much, for reference this is 100 people, if all the men are blood lusted with no survival instincts then it’s possible, but the men we have in this generation just won’t get the job done .

Give them a commander like Julius Caesar or Napoleon and believe me, they will be able to capture any capital in the world.

 

[Yliaster]

I think 100 unarmed humans vs an adult tiger would be a more balanced but still brutal fight

10 humans can most likely overwhelm an Adult Tiger by breaking its limbs or disturbing its vision

You guys are underestimating the analytical capabilities of Man not to mention that Tigers relatively have a
lower center of gravity compared to the other Predators mentioned like Gorillas and Bears who are more or
less Bipedal

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I remember seeing a news story about a Russian boxer killing a bear with a knife. He managed to shoot btw, but then he started fighting the bear with a knife. I'd rather die, because the guy later became a sub5.


Obviously 100 people would win against anyone.

Bears attacks are actually quite rare. Unlike tigers that are aggressive and confrontational. Bears are shy and passive animals. 9 time out of 10 the bear is going to run away than put up a fight. Just holding your ground like this is enough to scare them

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

we are not in anime nigga

Everything has weak points, if it's eyes get gouged or it gets tired it's essentially over

Humans are known for having some of the best endurance among any animal to exist. It takes a ton of endurance to kill 100 guys especially if they pile on you

 

[Jason Voorhees]

10 humans can most likely overwhelm an Adult Tiger by breaking its limbs or disturbing its vision

You guys are underestimating the analytical capabilities of Man not to mention that Tigers relatively have a
lower center of gravity compared to the other Predators mentioned like Gorillas and Bears who are more or
less Bipedal

Tiges are also massive animals. Tigers are more muscular, quicker and have lightening fast cat reflex. Tigers actively hunt for brown bears in Russia . They arent as big as grizzlies, they don't have as much mass but they make up for it with agility and speed

 

[MyDreamIsToBe183CM]

View attachment 3697763
This is even more brutal than the gorilla one, without any tools the only way would be to tire it until it eventually gives up.

But bears are even more vicious, agile and stronger than a gorilla, just it’s claws alone are intimidating.

I beat them all up me stronger

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

I beat them all up me stronger

Ok Time for bed now
One eighty threee

 

[playxiing]

Everything has weak points, if it's eyes get gouged or it gets tired it's essentially over

Humans are known for having some of the best endurance among any animal to exist. It takes a ton of endurance to kill 100 guys especially if they pile on you

100 randoms guys wont win
bc random people aren't trained to fight much less and also once a gorilla violently kills or injures a few, most people will flee and get into panic. the group will quickly disorganize
Fighting morale drops instantly when faced with a brutal real-time death
100 well trained soldiers ?? obviously yes even without weapons

 

[back/forward]

Tiers are also massive animals. Tigers are more muscular, quicker and have lightening fast reflex. Tigers actually actively hunt for brown bears in Russia . They arent as big as grizzlies, they don't have as much mass but they make up for it with agility and speed

View attachment 3697832View attachment 3697834

I think a tiger could really wreak havoc and disorient 100 people, but I don't think he would win. People, no matter how retarded they are, have critical thinking and that is a big advantage. Among 100 people, there is a chance that there will be 1 person who knows how to manage and organize people, and that person will be the key to victory.

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

100 randoms guys wont win
bc random people aren't trained to fight much less and also once a gorilla violently kills or injures a few, most people will flee and get into panic. the group will quickly disorganize
Fighting morale drops instantly when faced with a brutal real-time death
100 well trained soldiers ?? obviously even without weapons

yeah I think this is where the rules of the fight come into play mainly

If you give them even like an hour to strategize it'd make it completely different than if they just were teleported to fight

Also it's not exactly clear if there's any escape or if it is 100% to the death and a party only wins with the other dead. I could be very wrong but I feel like if there is legit nowhere to flee fight or flight would make you put up a good stand

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

100 randoms guys wont win
bc random people aren't trained to fight much less and also once a gorilla violently kills or injures a few, most people will flee and get into panic. the group will quickly disorganize
Fighting morale drops instantly when faced with a brutal real-time death
100 well trained soldiers ?? obviously even without weapons

Exactly and this is what people fail to understand in my previous thread they said 100 men would win acting like those 100 are peak human with incredible skill and organization, it’s not realistic at all.

 

[wsada]

wouldn't polar bear be more interesting? Humans stomp anyways

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

wouldn't polar bear be more interesting? Humans stomp anyways

It be overkill and by a lot