I Tried Making a More Objective Looks Rating System-Need Honest Feedback From This Forum

[Tom909012]

Hey everyone,
Website- looksmaxrate.com
I’ve been working on a new looksmaxxing website for a while now and finally decided to share it here. I built it because I noticed that a lot of ratings and advice online feel random or based on personal bias, and I wanted to try making something a bit more structured and consistent.

My goal with the site is pretty simple: create ratings and guidance that actually reflect real looksmax principles. I’ve been putting a lot of time into researching common standards and trying to make the scoring system reflect that as accurately as possible.

It’s still early, and I’m honestly trying to improve it as much as I can. I’d really appreciate if people here could check it out and give honest feedback. If you think the rating logic is off somewhere, something feels biased, or the features could be better, I want to hear it.

I’m not claiming it’s perfect at all. I’m just trying to build something useful for the community and refine it with real input.

If anyone is willing to:

• test the rating system
• leave a review
• point out flaws or improvements

that would help a lot.

Thanks to anyone who takes the time to check it out. I’ve put a lot of work into building this and I’m trying to make sure the ratings stay grounded in actual looksmax concepts rather than random opinions. Website- looksmaxrate.com

 

[ascendingmoid]

I think its a good tool. I just made an account and got my rating but I cant post it to the leaderboard and I cant see anyone else.

 

[ascendingmoid]

I am exited to see what it becomes.

 

[Tom909012]

I am exited to see what it becomes.

Appreciate you checking it out and making an account, that means a lot.

Yeah the leaderboard thing is a bug right now. I’m working on fixing it so people can actually post their ratings and see everyone else’s. Should have that sorted soon.

Glad you liked the tool so far though. This is still pretty early and I’ve got a lot more planned for it. Been putting a ton of time into building it and I’m excited to keep improving it and adding more features as people give feedback.

Thanks again for trying it and for the support.

 

[Whiteboard7]

Hey everyone,
Website- looksmaxrate.com
I’ve been working on a new looksmaxxing website for a while now and finally decided to share it here. I built it because I noticed that a lot of ratings and advice online feel random or based on personal bias, and I wanted to try making something a bit more structured and consistent.

My goal with the site is pretty simple: create ratings and guidance that actually reflect real looksmax principles. I’ve been putting a lot of time into researching common standards and trying to make the scoring system reflect that as accurately as possible.

It’s still early, and I’m honestly trying to improve it as much as I can. I’d really appreciate if people here could check it out and give honest feedback. If you think the rating logic is off somewhere, something feels biased, or the features could be better, I want to hear it.

I’m not claiming it’s perfect at all. I’m just trying to build something useful for the community and refine it with real input.

If anyone is willing to:

• test the rating system
• leave a review
• point out flaws or improvements

that would help a lot.

Thanks to anyone who takes the time to check it out. I’ve put a lot of work into building this and I’m trying to make sure the ratings stay grounded in actual looksmax concepts rather than random opinions. Website- looksmaxrate.com

Checked it out you don't steal data?

 

[L-MTNgymcell]

Hey everyone,
Website- looksmaxrate.com
I’ve been working on a new looksmaxxing website for a while now and finally decided to share it here. I built it because I noticed that a lot of ratings and advice online feel random or based on personal bias, and I wanted to try making something a bit more structured and consistent.

My goal with the site is pretty simple: create ratings and guidance that actually reflect real looksmax principles. I’ve been putting a lot of time into researching common standards and trying to make the scoring system reflect that as accurately as possible.

It’s still early, and I’m honestly trying to improve it as much as I can. I’d really appreciate if people here could check it out and give honest feedback. If you think the rating logic is off somewhere, something feels biased, or the features could be better, I want to hear it.

I’m not claiming it’s perfect at all. I’m just trying to build something useful for the community and refine it with real input.

If anyone is willing to:

• test the rating system
• leave a review
• point out flaws or improvements

that would help a lot.

Thanks to anyone who takes the time to check it out. I’ve put a lot of work into building this and I’m trying to make sure the ratings stay grounded in actual looksmax concepts rather than random opinions. Website- looksmaxrate.com

jfl?

 

[L-MTNgymcell]

If anyone is willing to:

• test the rating system
• leave a review
• point out flaws or improvements

that would help a lot.

Thanks to anyone who takes the time to check it out. I’ve put a lot of work into building this and I’m trying to make sure the ratings stay grounded in actual looksmax concepts rather than random opinions. Website- looksmaxrate.com

also 3 face scans only is brutal g let is test it

 

[simplyvrilliant]

Used this it said mtn

 

[e1337]

This site gave me HTN lmaooooo

 

[e1337]

This site gave me HTN lmaooooo

And chadlite on a frauded mirror pic

Your scale has potential but it's waaaaaay too nice

 

[e1337]

And chadlite on a frauded mirror pic

Your scale has potential but it's waaaaaay too nice

Honestly, if you let users place their own points of measurement like on faceiq labs itll turn out better.

 

[mrpein]

looks good now can i get free premium because im og

 

[e1337]

Honestly, if you let users place their own points of measurement like on faceiq labs itll turn out better.

Now gave myself chad w a slightly frauded mirror pic.

I understand this is early in development but its just for u to take in consideration

Btw u can bypass the 3 picture limit if you delete your cookies after reaching said limit

 

[iqletandrew73]

Not to be rude but it definitely gives shit ratings (way too nice)
Got rated chadlite with a bad front pic (hair, angle, lights sucked lowkey) I took in 10 secs
If I asked someone to rate me here I'd get MLTN, HLTN or maybe LMTN, so yh 2 entire rating up is not so accurate
Also Adam and True Adam doesn't exist, I don't know why you put it in
The GUI looks nice tho, good effort, just focus on the system

 

[Tom909012]

Not to be rude but it definitely gives shit ratings (way too nice)
Got rated chadlite with a bad front pic (hair, angle, lights sucked lowkey) I took in 10 secs
If I asked someone to rate me here I'd get MLTN, HLTN or maybe LMTN, so yh 2 entire rating up is not so accurate
Also Adam and True Adam doesn't exist, I don't know why you put it in
The GUI looks nice tho, good effort, just focus on the system

View attachment 4776019

Appreciate the feedback, this is the kind of stuff I need to improve it.


Right now the system weights most measurements pretty evenly, so I’m working on adjusting it to prioritize certain features more like jaw structure, eye area, and overall harmony so the ratings feel more accurate instead of inflated. Hopefully will have that done in a few days


In your case specifically, even if the pic wasn’t great, you still seem to have solid underlying bone structure and proportions, which is what the current version mainly analyzes, so i'm not surprised you got a great score

That said, there are definitely factors that are harder to quantify with pure measurements like coloring, skin quality, hair, and overall presentation, and those can have a big impact on perceived attractiveness. That’s something I’m working on integrating better into the system.


Focusing on the system, that’s the main priority right now

 

[Tom909012]

Now gave myself chad w a slightly frauded mirror pic.

I understand this is early in development but its just for u to take in consideration

Btw u can bypass the 3 picture limit if you delete your cookies after reaching said limit

Appreciate you testing it like that, that actually helps a lot.


Yeah frauded pics are definitely something I’m aware of, the current system doesn’t fully account for angles correctly so it can get boosted pretty easily in those cases. I’m working on making it stricter with consistency checks across photos so stuff like that has less impact.


And good catch on the cookie bypass, I’ll patch that soon. Still in early phase focusing on the ratings and accuracy more than anything else


Thanks for the help!

 

[Tom909012]

looks good now can i get free premium because im og

Lol I might make all the ratings free for a while so that I can get more feedback

 

[mrpein]

Lol I might make all the ratings free for a while so that I can get more feedback

Yes please do I really want to get my analysis

 

[Tom909012]

Honestly, if you let users place their own points of measurement like on faceiq labs itll turn out better.

Right now we use a google software that is extremely accurate and fast. The only times it runs into issues is if the photo is offset or not clear

 

[Tom909012]

Used this it said mtn

I hope it didn't lmao

 

[Tom909012]

Everything is handled through a third party service that stores it securely, so it’s private, and I don’t even have direct access to personal data like that.

Checked it out you don't steal data?

 

[jdksjfejwlek]

that seems like just chatgpt with faceiq ui

sean do not have 0.87 midface

ud better move towards face iq manual mapping tool, but without any ai, so software can work for free, u will have to pay for domain and server only

 

[Whiteboard7]

Everything is handled through a third party service that stores it securely, so it’s private, and I don’t even have direct access to personal data like that.

I gotcha

 

[jdksjfejwlek]

this is also kinda funny

this is what chatgpt would toss u.
as i said, u only have option to make mannual mapping or create one more ai-rater slop.
just trust me ive worked on tools that involves ai as an tool (agent), and u will never be able to make it actually accurate.
and if u combine ai rate + manual map, u will just craete faceiq labs but worse, cuz he has more money and fame to push his product

 

[iqletandrew73]

Appreciate the feedback, this is the kind of stuff I need to improve it.


Right now the system weights most measurements pretty evenly, so I’m working on adjusting it to prioritize certain features more like jaw structure, eye area, and overall harmony so the ratings feel more accurate instead of inflated. Hopefully will have that done in a few days


In your case specifically, even if the pic wasn’t great, you still seem to have solid underlying bone structure and proportions, which is what the current version mainly analyzes, so i'm not surprised you got a great score

That said, there are definitely factors that are harder to quantify with pure measurements like coloring, skin quality, hair, and overall presentation, and those can have a big impact on perceived attractiveness. That’s something I’m working on integrating better into the system.


Focusing on the system, that’s the main priority right now

Love it brah, I'll follow you so I don't miss out on updates, could there be a deal between you and me that I get lifelong service for premium if I regularly test it with samples and give you data about it? I'm also learning IT so it would be a great learning experience