6ft4
Juggernaut Genes Possessor
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,863
- Reputation
- 24,855
I've been experiencing a real mental itch lately where individual theories or threads dont feel like they are leading towards something even if they might allow for eurika moments.
I need to start from absolute scratch and formulate a "theory of everything" like the highest IQ man in the world and former bouncer Chris Langan.
I'm not exactly sure how this will look, but the basis will be surrounding things like the purpose of life, reincarnation, explaining consciousness etc
I am not sure where I will draw the line between that theory and then the beginning of the ideology that stems from it which will tackle morality, race, political system etc
Once the moral code has been solidified, the next step would be devise a strategy to gain power to assert the beliefs of the ideology.
Some strategic ideas I have are as follows:
A fundamental pillar is to be offensive(on the offense) and expansive rather than to be defensive or trying to hold on to former traditions that are eroding no matter whether we want them to be preserved or not.
This will be reflected in everything down to slogans which will signify advancement. eg. the contrast between "seize the day" v "no surrender" one is offensive and expansive, one is defensive and trying to hold onto what they have.
There must be constant innovation and creativity in the attack so that the opponents are the ones who constantly need to be thinking and reacting while trying to counteract and prevent our momentum.
An attack doesn't even need to be something damaging to opponents, it can simply be something that benefits us like a new sub culture development or religious practice that strengthens our bonds and cant be diminished by our opponents while it's on the ascendency, whereas things like christianity can be attacked by our opponents while it's on the descendency.
The key to the offensive strategy will be innovation and novelty.
Ambition: there must be a level of ambition that makes lower levels of ambition or conservatism feel like a waste of energy in comparison.
We basically think big, think outside the box and go for the whole cake rather than a slice, even if the idea seems so bold that our opponents get lazy and let their guard down because they simply think we would never even dare to try that, we must be prepared to try it.
Cult like formation among early adopting, young male members.
Looking at some organizations for violent uprisings, they often draw in teens of 15 years old who enter training and then begin duty at 18 while they feel at their most invincible because the idea of them dying doesnt even seem like a reality yet and even if they were told they were likely to do they'd probably say they dont care because life has little value when you dont feel like youve built up anything yet to lose and the opportunity to be part of the fight feels worth it because its the way you can make your first significant impact on the world.
I dont suggest it would be in the strategy to take up arms but such a level of commitment must be on standby and it will come from young male members.
The idea will be to create a show of force with mass numbers of young, physically fit men who could become violent without weapons if they wanted to but use it as a threat rather than acting upon it.
Should the political will of the majority be ignored by the existing power structure, then escalated shows of force will be a requirement to indicate that they dont have what it takes to disobey the political will of the new majority and think they can get away with it
The goal will be mimimal violence for maximum political gain as that makes the members easier to pick off and lock up.
Godtier propaganda and slandering of opponents via popular culture seen by the masses
might post more later
I need to start from absolute scratch and formulate a "theory of everything" like the highest IQ man in the world and former bouncer Chris Langan.
I'm not exactly sure how this will look, but the basis will be surrounding things like the purpose of life, reincarnation, explaining consciousness etc
I am not sure where I will draw the line between that theory and then the beginning of the ideology that stems from it which will tackle morality, race, political system etc
Once the moral code has been solidified, the next step would be devise a strategy to gain power to assert the beliefs of the ideology.
Some strategic ideas I have are as follows:
A fundamental pillar is to be offensive(on the offense) and expansive rather than to be defensive or trying to hold on to former traditions that are eroding no matter whether we want them to be preserved or not.
This will be reflected in everything down to slogans which will signify advancement. eg. the contrast between "seize the day" v "no surrender" one is offensive and expansive, one is defensive and trying to hold onto what they have.
There must be constant innovation and creativity in the attack so that the opponents are the ones who constantly need to be thinking and reacting while trying to counteract and prevent our momentum.
An attack doesn't even need to be something damaging to opponents, it can simply be something that benefits us like a new sub culture development or religious practice that strengthens our bonds and cant be diminished by our opponents while it's on the ascendency, whereas things like christianity can be attacked by our opponents while it's on the descendency.
The key to the offensive strategy will be innovation and novelty.
Ambition: there must be a level of ambition that makes lower levels of ambition or conservatism feel like a waste of energy in comparison.
We basically think big, think outside the box and go for the whole cake rather than a slice, even if the idea seems so bold that our opponents get lazy and let their guard down because they simply think we would never even dare to try that, we must be prepared to try it.
Cult like formation among early adopting, young male members.
Looking at some organizations for violent uprisings, they often draw in teens of 15 years old who enter training and then begin duty at 18 while they feel at their most invincible because the idea of them dying doesnt even seem like a reality yet and even if they were told they were likely to do they'd probably say they dont care because life has little value when you dont feel like youve built up anything yet to lose and the opportunity to be part of the fight feels worth it because its the way you can make your first significant impact on the world.
I dont suggest it would be in the strategy to take up arms but such a level of commitment must be on standby and it will come from young male members.
The idea will be to create a show of force with mass numbers of young, physically fit men who could become violent without weapons if they wanted to but use it as a threat rather than acting upon it.
Should the political will of the majority be ignored by the existing power structure, then escalated shows of force will be a requirement to indicate that they dont have what it takes to disobey the political will of the new majority and think they can get away with it
The goal will be mimimal violence for maximum political gain as that makes the members easier to pick off and lock up.
Godtier propaganda and slandering of opponents via popular culture seen by the masses
might post more later
