Ideal midface ratio is as close to 1.1:1 as possible

Reformed

Reformed

Germanymaxxing
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Posts
10,833
Reputation
22,378
JFL at believing anything as LOW as 1:1 is ok. Minimum is 1.05:1 and 1.1:1 being perfect. That’s what perfect forward growth gets you.

Also to debunk some copes:
-No, long midface isn’t masculine. No correlation
-Just because some good looking people still have a long midface it doesn’t make it ok. U need a lot of good features to out halo a long midface, and you’ll probably never reach that level
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: TheBiggestIncelEver, Heinrich Schmidt, itneverbegan22 and 7 others
I agree that 1.1:1 is ideal.

However, long midface is masculine, but masculine doesn’t mean good-looking (ogres are masculine).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Heinrich Schmidt, Deleted member 38639, aspiringexcel and 3 others
I agree that 1.1:1 is ideal.

However, long midface is masculine, but masculine doesn’t mean good-looking (ogres are masculine).
No it isn’t. It’s not even correlated with Testosterone. It’s just bad genetics
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: baldgeeza and thecel
I agree that 1.1:1 is ideal.

However, long midface is masculine, but masculine doesn’t mean good-looking (ogres are masculine).
I have a long mid-face yet I get mistaken for a woman every time.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MoggsWithBoness, Krakowski, thecel and 1 other person
I agree that 1.1:1 is ideal.

However, long midface is masculine, but masculine doesn’t mean good-looking (ogres are masculine).
Most people which get classified as ogres aren't actually very masculine.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Low iq thread

Gettyimages 1305145965 612x612
DQEitloXkAApbhv
Ian Somerhalder scaled


This guys make absolutely every woman wet

Being good looking with a long midface is possible IF u have a good FWHR
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: baldgeeza, SurgeryEnjoyer, sub5inchcel and 2 others
No it isn’t. It’s not even correlated with Testosterone. It’s just bad genetics

It’s correlated with masculine bone development and taller height.
 
I have a long mid-face yet I get mistaken for a woman every time.

How do you get mistaken for a woman? Do you have long hair? Are you a framecel? A manlet?

 
Most people which get classified as ogres aren't actually very masculine.
Tbh it's not even mid-face ratio, it's fWHR that matters
3-Figure1-1.png
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Heinrich Schmidt, Mr. Nobody, BongMog and 4 others
@thecel
How do you get mistaken for a woman? Do you have long hair? Are you a framecel? A manlet?

don't confuse long midface and horse face

Horseface is truecel tier
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 38639 and thecel
How do you get mistaken for a woman? Do you have long hair? Are you a framecel? A manlet?

Yes, I have long hair though I used to get mistaken for a woman more frequently when I had a buzzcut. Yes, I'm a framelet just like @Anstrum95 (same build) and yes, I'm a 6'0 manlet.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
i hate you....
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Tbh it's not even mid-face ratio, it's fWHR that matters
3-Figure1-1.png
Yeah the midface ratio is a really useless measurement, because the height of your middle third is only relative to the face width, it has nothing to do with your eye spacing or the distance from your lip to your pupils.
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: It'snotover, User49, incel194012940 and 2 others
Tbh it's not even mid-face ratio, it's fWHR that matters
3-Figure1-1.png

Both MFR and FWHR are different between these guys. The left guy has a low midface ratio.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: St.TikTokcel
JFL at believing anything as LOW as 1:1 is ok. Minimum is 1.05:1 and 1.1:1 being perfect. That’s what perfect forward growth gets you.

Also to debunk some copes:
-No, long midface isn’t masculine. No correlation
-Just because some good looking people still have a long midface it doesn’t make it ok. U need a lot of good features to out halo a long midface, and you’ll probably never reach that level
good shit greycel
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: beypazarisoda0 and thecel
No it isn’t. It’s not even correlated with Testosterone. It’s just bad genetics
Testosterone has little to do with skull proportions jfl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: SurgeryEnjoyer, thecel and Deleted member 27219
@thecel testosterone does have an effect on soft tissues and bone growth but not on base skull proportions
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Why use the PSL scale, and why is 3 PSL the minimum? Shit poll.
It's easier

3 - SubNormie
4- Normie
5- High tier Normie
6- Chadlite
7- Chad

It's so much better than 0/10 scale
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
I guess estrogen does since I had high prenatal estrogen.
Ur such a shit user. All u do is be sarcastic or say something hindu curry paki related
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bugeye, It'snotover, Deleted member 27219 and 2 others
It's easier

3 - SubNormie
4- Normie
5- High tier Normie
6- Chadlite
7- Chad

It's so much better than 0/10 scale

WHY IS THE MINIMUM 3

Just get outta here, mogger. No more above-average-centric surveys.

I should’ve made the survey. And I’d center the middle PSL rating at the average. Equal distances below and above.
 
Ur such a shit user. All u do is be sarcastic or say something hindu curry paki related
Where did you find sarcasm? I just stated a basic fact that I had high prenatal estrogen. You're chimping out for no reason you retarded red ape.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Itsoverforme.gg and Reformed
JFL at believing anything as LOW as 1:1 is ok. Minimum is 1.05:1 and 1.1:1 being perfect. That’s what perfect forward growth gets you.

Also to debunk some copes:
-No, long midface isn’t masculine. No correlation
-Just because some good looking people still have a long midface it doesn’t make it ok. U need a lot of good features to out halo a long midface, and you’ll probably never reach that level
thats not true, i show here: https://looksmax.org/threads/why-so...0-98-but-dont-look-like.628226/#post-10084861
 
U measure wrong. U measure downwards angles which increases it
no i didnt lol, i measure the exactly pixels. The thing is people measure like shit to cope.
 
1681213584889
measure by yourself
 
Midface is fucking cope. Its not as big failo as people here says. What make you look narrow ...if you dont have enough bonemass.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and Reformed
Lack of midface make you baby looking which is failo. You need more midface for masculine look.
Yes ofc downwards growth is masc now
 
Yes ofc downwards growth is masc now
Stop this cope. What you need is more bonemass. If you dont have it. You will look narrow.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Tf u measuring. I’m using my fingers on the screen and I can easily tell its more than 1
lol im using a digital rule. Thats the problem with midface ratios people here measure like shit. I use photopea.com
 
  • +1
Reactions: sub5inchcel
Stop this cope. What you need is more bonemass. If you dont have it. You will look narrow.
Bonemass is always good and so is a compact midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Bonemass is always good and so is a compact midface
Bonemass is what make you attractive along with good eye area. Midface is really cope unless it is deformed tier.

1681214204848
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Reformed
Tf u measuring. I’m using my fingers on the screen and I can easily tell its more than 1
1681214181696
like this, the distance between the center of the pupils is 143 pixels, then the distance between the midterm of vertical distance of each pupil until the cupid bows is 145 pixels. The lip is open 3 pixels. So its 143/148 =0.96
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Reformed
View attachment 2146988 like this, the distance between the center of the pupils is 143 pixels, then the distance between the midterm of vertical distance of each pupil until the cupid bows is 145 pixels. The lip is open 3 pixels. So its 143/148 =0.96
Interesting. Chico looks compact
 
Interesting. Chico looks compact
he is, is just that the ideal midface ratio is not exactly 1 as people think. In the thread i mentioned is explained how other things influency this, like wide face (cheekbones) + wide pfl + larger alar base + larger nose bridge + high nose bridge. All those give the impression of a shorter midface.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Reformed
My midface is 1.05
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 40761, thecel and Reformed

Similar threads

Seth Walsh
Replies
17
Views
3K
Nihonz9
Nihonz9
LilJojo
Replies
9
Views
2K
lestoa
lestoa
BinPanda
Replies
26
Views
1K
BinPanda
BinPanda
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
18
Views
3K
Spidermanne2returns
Spidermanne2returns

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top