If looks are about evolutionary success than why is dark skin and dark eyes less attractive?

whiteissuperior

whiteissuperior

Bu to the sinner he gives the task of gathering.
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Posts
8,634
Reputation
15,651
Title.

Objectively white/light skin and white eye are more prone to sun damage and skin cancer. So wouldnt evolution want us to have darker rather than lighter skin?? Same with colored eyes. This doesnt seem to be the case though.

Like other things, like wide jaw, good brow ridge, AKA high T features, make sense, but not coloring.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel, Gengar, Deleted member 6997 and 3 others
Maghrebi bad boys rule the world.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, magnificentcel and Deleted member 6273
Light features are rare and therefore desirable.
The vast majority of people on earth have dark hair and dark eyes and dark skin.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: magnificentcel, WadlowMaxxing and Deleted member 6273
Title.

Objectively white/light skin and white eye are more prone to sun damage and skin cancer. So wouldnt evolution want us to have darker rather than lighter skin?? Same with colored eyes. This doesnt seem to be the case though.

Like other things, like wide jaw, good brow ridge, AKA high T features, make sense, but not coloring.
Evolution is BS. All that matters is what is aesthetic/good to look at for females. And white skin light eyes are more aesthetically pleasing.
 
Evolution is BS. All that matters is what is aesthetic/good to look at for females. And white skin light eyes are more aesthetically pleasing.
isnt what is aesthetically`pleasing tied to evolutionary fitness? Flowers, cute puppies, and the evening sky are aesthetically pleasing, that doesn't mean females wanna fuck those things
 
  • +1
Reactions: brainded
Its not that simple. You are thinking about the modern world where everyone lives together. Skin color was mostly dependent on what region you lived in and the amount of sun exposure you are subjected to. Darker skin tones absorb more light and black/darker people have higher vitamin D requirements.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099, Deleted member 6273 and Deleted member 9819
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4332, datboijj and WadlowMaxxing
isnt what is aesthetically`pleasing tied to evolutionary fitness? Flowers, cute puppies, and the evening sky are aesthetically pleasing, that doesn't mean females wanna fuck those things
Take the dog pill. Yes many girls fuck their dogs. As for inanimate objects like flowers of course they wouldn't fuck that.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: whiteissuperior

yea duh I know that, but are you arguing its social conditioning, or do you think its innate??

Its not that simple. You are thinking about the modern world where everyone lives together. Skin color was mostly dependent on what region you lived in and the amount of sun exposure you are subjected to. Darker skin tones absorb more light and black/darker people have higher vitamin D requirements.
whites are still more likely to get skin cancer and cataracts in the US, and need sunscreen to walk outside.
 
Light features are rare and therefore desirable.
The vast majority of people on earth have dark hair and dark eyes and dark skin.
Rare therefore desirable what?? So in countries with the population predominantly having lightskin and light eyes very dark skin and very dark eyes are desirable?
 
  • +1
Reactions: datboijj and whiteissuperior
Take the dog pill. Yes many girls fuck their dogs. As for inanimate objects like flowers of course they wouldn't fuck that.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4332, magnificentcel and Kekee
In europe those traits are, just like everywhere else, favorable for attractiveness, but they are also favorable for natural fitness in the environment, unlike in central africa or central america where those traits are so poor for your natural fitness in that environment that they cannot propagate.

It doesnt matter how attractive the feature is, if every person with that feature struggles to survive to mating age. In addition, features like light eyes and light hair are recessive and are not as easily expressed, so a massive chunk of the population needs those recessive genes for it to become a part of the gene pool. Even if you are attracted to someone with red hair or blue eyes, if you dont also have those genes, the kid between you and that person will not have blue eyes or red hair. also, because you can possess the gene without having blue eyes, you cannot always choose mates knowing they have that gene, which also makes it difficult to propagate. For example someone could have the right allele or SNP or whatever for blue eyes, but they also have the one for brown eyes, so their eyes are brown because the brown is dominant. And theres a whole bunch of other stuff but im not a geneticist so I am not sure about much else

also you could look up “fisherian runaway” where animals have sexually attractive traits that are good for mating but bad for survival. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway
 
Last edited:
light skin = shows more flaws so you can see all health indicators on the person

dark skin = conceals flaws so you cant see acne, skin infecfions as obviously

light eyes = allows you to perceive the other person’s eyes and pupils better.

Also colors like blue, green looks better than brown. take a sapphire or an emerald vs mud
 
  • +1
Reactions: curryslayerordeath
Rare therefore desirable what?? So in countries with the population predominantly having lightskin and light eyes very dark skin and very dark eyes are desirable?
No
 
Its also about showing that you can survive despite having a disadvantage.
 
Light eyed people can see better in the dark which is a good survival trait.

And like @EreptileDysfunction said light skinned people have lower vitamin d requirements
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6095
dark skin is desirable
 
1612131797387
 
But you said rare features were desirable jfl
I said that in relation to the OP. Light features are still seen as more attractive even in countries where they're more common. Blue eyes are still as attractive in the west as they are in third world countries.
 
Its also about showing that you can survive despite having a disadvantage.
if that were the case women should lust after rich trucels like Danny Devito

Light eyed people can see better in the dark which is a good survival trait.

And like @EreptileDysfunction said light skinned people have lower vitamin d requirements
light eyed people are significantly more likely to go blind due to cataracts and can't out outside without sunscreen if you're white
 
Light eyed people can see better in the dark which is a good survival trait.

And like @EreptileDysfunction said light skinned people have lower vitamin d requirements
Then why are lightskin and light eyes highly desired in tropical environments like say Thailand where they are dysgenic and can lead to a multitude of illnesses and conditions like melanoma?
 
Then why are lightskin and light eyes highly desired in tropical environments like say Thailand where they are dysgenic and can lead to a multitude of illnesses and conditions like melanoma?
Cause it’s aesthetic and rare to have those traits there. I just stated the evolutionary reasons for light skin and light eyes.

light eyed people are significantly more likely to go blind due to cataracts and can't out outside without sunscreen if you're white
Ok. But light skin and light eyes are European traits from areas where there was more darkness and less sunlight.
 
Light skin absorbs more Vitamin D, in places with limited sunlight exposure this is an advantage. While Dark skin protects against sunburns.

Light eyes have zero functional advantage, but the mutation spread wide because it was considered more attractive for most people.
 
I don't know anything about looks, if you're slaying you're fine
 
fisherian runaway
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
another thread by a deathnik
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Title.

Objectively white/light skin and white eye are more prone to sun damage and skin cancer. So wouldnt evolution want us to have darker rather than lighter skin?? Same with colored eyes. This doesnt seem to be the case though.

Like other things, like wide jaw, good brow ridge, AKA high T features, make sense, but not coloring.
We as whites come from cold countries ancestrally. We had no need for dark skin because the environment was dark & cold. We evolved these features specifically for that reason
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

Symaxx
Replies
21
Views
2K
jefferdingerdell
J
Aryan Incel
Replies
118
Views
9K
adeeyeah
adeeyeah

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top