If sexual dimorphism could be measured, what would be the ideal?

Dimorphism

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
User49

User49

victim of genetics
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Posts
5,595
Reputation
6,542
10 being the most dimorphic, 1 being the least

Within the ideal ranges, no ogre tier dimorphism
 
E8FB9E1F 02AB 4B7E A19B C2BD0A500613


Wide face hooding large nose this is ideal dimorphism
 
  • JFL
Reactions: StalinCel and User49
Attraction to the level of dimorphism depends on your life history speed. For example blacks like big asses, whites less
 
What features can allow for a bit of “feminization”?
 
1676295987079
1676296279903
1676296305192



This. Basically high robustness with some hints of cuteness and youthfullness is ideal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteissuperior, Deleted member 23017 and Deleted member 14392
So why didn’t u vote for max dimorphism
Because it's unhealthy and unattractive. Anything in excess is unhealthy and unattractive. I don't want to get prostate cancer. Fitness is about balance.
 
Fitness? As in facial dimorphism. Max dimorphism without reaching ogre territory
Because it's unhealthy and unattractive. Anything in excess is unhealthy and unattractive. I don't want to get prostate cancer. Fitness is about balance.
 
Fitness? As in facial dimorphism. Max dimorphism without reaching ogre territory
Be more clear. I'm not getting what you are trying to say.
 
its a good trait. the more the better
 
Be more clear. I'm not getting what you are trying to say.
chin to philtrum of 2.2 is ideal but not fully dimorphic. chin to philtrum of 2.5 is ideal and highly dimorphic. 2.75+ is ogre territory
 
chin to philtrum of 2.2 is ideal but not fully dimorphic. chin to philtrum of 2.5 is ideal and highly dimorphic. 2.75+ is ogre territory
Chin to philtrum ratio is stupid. And doesn't signal anything.
 
Is this 10/10 dimorphism per your defintion?
1676305179809

If yes than that’s ideal. You intimidate other men and are hot to women
 
Can't be with that low of fwhr.
His face should be wider indeed. But then he is like a 9/10 in dimorphism if you say Cavill is an 8/10 . Because Mahers skull is definitely more Dom and dimorphic than Cavill and the other men you posted
 
His face should be wider indeed.
Yes. This is a 10
1676307159478

But then he is like a 9/10 in dimorphism if you say Cavill is an 8/10 . Because Mahers skull is definitely more Dom and dimorphic than Cavill and the other men you posted
Maher's jaw is too narrow to be a 9. He is more like 8.5-8.75. These are more of a 9.
1676307361503
1676307401487


But even if he was a 9. It would be not ideal. I have posted a lot about it. But girls with high disgust don't prefer hyper masculine and feminine men.

 
depends if its on men or women, for men its 7 for women its a 6.

shutterstock_editorial_312119q_huge_preview-7ce0e71b2436453d91e9837d4e772379.jpg

0_DSOL_Yael_Shelbia_1.jpg
 
10 obviously

T2r60he.jpg
 
Yes. This is a 10
View attachment 2077495

Maher's jaw is too narrow to be a 9. He is more like 8.5-8.75. These are more of a 9.
View attachment 2077499View attachment 2077503

But even if he was a 9. It would be not ideal. I have posted a lot about it. But girls with high disgust don't prefer hyper masculine and feminine men.

I said excluding ogres and higher chin to philtrum ratios are dimorphic. It was just an example. Gonial angle, nasofrontal angle etc are also dimorphic measurements
 
  • +1
Reactions: User49
uve been here for years u should know. There are ideals but the other end is usually more dimorphic than the other.
If it’s already in the ideal ranges them the difference between 1 and 10 is minimal and is insignificant for real world difference
 

Similar threads

EverythingMattersCel
Replies
24
Views
931
Ultimate Subhuman™
Ultimate Subhuman™
Growth Plate
Replies
19
Views
565
haramzada
haramzada
Acne Victim
Replies
3
Views
110
paladincel_
paladincel_
beniman
Replies
37
Views
1K
Never Get Up
Never Get Up
S
Replies
34
Views
1K
WINGLESS ANGEL
WINGLESS ANGEL

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top