If you think you need to be taller than 6 feet barefoot to slay you are coping

[moreroidsmoredates]

Sorry kiddos, but if you think you realistically need more than 6 foot of height to slay you are compensating for your shitty face and/or shitty frame.
6'1 to 6'3 is Ideal range though, at that point you can build a physique without the use of roids and achieve a lean aesthetic peak female gaze body.
What is also not talked about enough here is FRAME.
After 6 foot its FRAME that makes you or breaks you.
6'1 with wide frame and V taper is 1000% more appealing than tall narrow shouldered 6'5 lanket
You people just think about who would "mog" in random scenarios in your head.
While a taller guy stands out more, its not nessecarily in a sexual way you fools.
At 6'4+ roids are absolutely mandatory to achieve a respectable aesthetic physique anyway, so good luck with blasting and cruising roids in your early twenties or worse earlier and aging 10 years in 2.

 

[moreroidsmoredates]

@The Grinch @Orc @Blackgymmax @Jason Voorhees

 

[Hernan]

In Belgium you gotta be @ 18.
It’s just like that, I wish it wasn’t, but it just is.

 

[OxyFanNigga]

the hoes of sri lanka beg to differ little virgin

 

[IraniancelV2]

Frame is extremely underrated

 

[moreroidsmoredates]

Frame is extremely underrated

No it’s not. It’s what makes or breaks you as a man.

 

[IraniancelV2]

No it’s not. It’s what makes or breaks you as a man.

Over if you aren't even close to this

 

[Agarthianincel271]

Sorry kiddos, but if you think you realistically need more than 6 foot of height to slay you are compensating for your shitty face and/or shitty frame.
6'1 to 6'3 is Ideal range though, at that point you can build a physique without the use of roids and achieve a lean aesthetic peak female gaze body.
What is also not talked about enough here is FRAME.
After 6 foot its FRAME that makes you or breaks you.
6'1 with wide frame and V taper is 1000% more appealing than tall narrow shouldered 6'5 lanket
You people just think about who would "mog" in random scenarios in your head.
While a taller guy stands out more, its not nessecarily in a sexual way you fools.
At 6'4+ roids are absolutely mandatory to achieve a respectable aesthetic physique anyway, so good luck with blasting and cruising roids in your early twenties or worse earlier and aging 10 years in 2.

holy cope

 

[futurechadlite111]

Sorry kiddos, but if you think you realistically need more than 6 foot of height to slay you are compensating for your shitty face and/or shitty frame.

face is always first, but more height is always better, capped at around 6'6 tho where proportions start to look weird.

Sorry kiddos, but if you think you realistically need more than 6 foot of height to slay you are compensating for your shitty face and/or shitty frame.
6'1 to 6'3 is Ideal range though, at that point you can build a physique without the use of roids and achieve a lean aesthetic peak female gaze body.
What is also not talked about enough here is FRAME.

frame is water nigga, u can build a aesthetic physique at 6'5 w/o roiding, just takes more time, cope.

After 6 foot its FRAME that makes you or breaks you.

id sayy 6'5 with bad frame sitll mogs 6ft with good frame

6'1 with wide frame and V taper is 1000% more appealing than tall narrow shouldered 6'5 lanket

cope, cope thread it goes at this order 1.face 2. height 3. frame

 

[tyym1111]

face is law
saying ts as 6'4 with good physique

 

[SoundnVision]

5'10 minimum and wide frame the taller you get the less frame matters

 

[Hernan]

face is law
saying ts as 6'4 with good physique

Then you’re ugly as shit if you don’t pull a lot with those stats. I don’t believe you are but you’re probs exaggerating.

 

[tyym1111]

Then you’re ugly as shit if you don’t pull a lot with those stats. I don’t believe you are but you’re probs exaggerating.

u can rate me on pm if u want i got rated mtn most of the time

 

[Hernan]

u can rate me on pm if u want i got rated mtn most of the time

Show me.