If you're a 7 then every female is a supermodel. Know your fucking place Karen.

[PurplePaintBox]

 

[godsmistake]

 

[PurplePaintBox]

Go to 2:17 for a quick laugh

 

[Deleted member 2745]

And that's why we get the 80/20 rule

 

[PurplePaintBox]

ur avi, thread and posts are disgusting
killyourself

Yeah but you didn't answer the question. Does she look Japanese?

 

[pisslord]

Yeah but you didn't answer the question. Does she look Japanese?

sorry

 

[Deleted member 1774]

sorry

np, bro.

 

[6'4 looksmaxxxer]

View attachment 159902
And that's why we get the 80/20 rule

Welcome back mate

 

[DOggo]

 

[Arkantos]

Go to 2:17 for a quick laugh

jfl at that delusion

 

[reptiles]

View attachment 159902
And that's why we get the 80/20 rule

Laughs me

 

[karbo]

its so fucking funny seeing how every single normie without exception rates himself/herself as 'above average'

 

[Butthurt Dweller]

All bitches think their pussies made of gold and men act like its platinum

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

This looks staged. no way everyone there is rating themselves that high

 

[xit]

Go to 2:17 for a quick laugh

wtf. did they only interview faggots and dykes for this video? they sound so fucking gay

also

this guy gave himself a 10

 

[Deleted member 1100]

She's blackpilled and knows rating is cope and a delusional flawed concept

 

[TsarTsar444]

Caged so hard when they they started saying 7-10. I wish they were invited here so they could rope

 

[rockndogs]

Go to 2:17 for a quick laugh

there is not a single 5/10 + in this video jfl

 

[DOggo]

there is not a single 5/10 + in this video jfl

0:40

 

[Deleted member 756]

She’s a legit 8

 

[Deleted member 2227]

View attachment 160237

She's blackpilled and knows rating is cope and a delusional flawed concept

How is cope and flawed?

 

[Deleted member 3328]

shes 3 at best jfl

 

[Deleted member 1100]

How is cope and flawed?

Rating is based on fractions:

1/10, 2/10, 3/10...10/10
1/8, 2/8, 3/8... 8/8

No matter the number, if it's the usual 10 scale or the autistic 8 scale, in both the rater is assuming he knows what a 10 is and what a 0 is, otherwise he wouldn't be able to rate people in between.

It's also virtually impossible to anyone to know how much some particular bad feature detracts on someone's rate, and how much each level of severity detracts on the rating.

For example, let's take periorbital dark circles as a bad feature to analyze:

First, you need to determine how much each one will detract on someone's rate:

Pigmentar:

Vascular:

Structural:

Second, you'll need to determine how much the severity of each one detracts on the final rate too:

Because you can have just a little bit of dark circles, it can be more, or it can be severe...

Another example is eyebrows, there are tons of features that you need to take into acount:

Shape;
Length;
Thickness;
Density;
Tilt;
Vertical distance;
Color;
Hair quality;
Hair growth partner (the eyebrows hair grows in different directions depending on where it's located on the eyebrow)



What people do in reality is rate people based on attractiveness, which is both objective (because of beauty that is an objective matter) and subjective, and that is almost pointless since some people will think you're attractive and others don't and that's why you get people rating someone here a 4/8 and others rating the same person 5/8. 1 point of difference for the same face?? That means only one of two things:

1- One thinks the person is unattractive and it's downgrading the rate, or the other things the person is unattractive and it's upgrading the rate. (or both at the same time) (In both cases we're dealing not with beauty, but attractiveness)

2- They can't come to an agreement to how much each feature detracts on the rating



I got a good example of this on this thread I made, almost 1/4 of people voted the original Taylor Hill as more BEAUTIFUL despite the morphed one being a version of her with a bunch of her flaws minimized:

https://looksmax.org/threads/which-one-is-more-beautiful-poll.61123/

 

[Effortless]

This can't be real, all of them giving themselves 8 wtf.

 

[Deleted member 2227]

Rating is based on fractions:

1/10, 2/10, 3/10...10/10
1/8, 2/8, 3/8... 8/8

No matter the number, if it's the usual 10 scale or the autistic 8 scale, in both the rater is assuming he knows what a 10 is and what a 0 is, otherwise he wouldn't be able to rate people in between.

It's also virtually impossible to anyone to know how much some particular bad feature detracts on someone's rate, and how much each level of severity detracts on the rating.

For example, let's take periorbital dark circles as a bad feature to analyze:

First, you need to determine how much each one will detract on someone's rate:

Pigmentar:

Vascular:

Structural:

Second, you'll need to determine how much the severity of each one detracts on the final rate too:

Because you can have just a little bit of dark circles, it can be more, or it can be severe...

Another example is eyebrows, there are tons of features that you need to take into acount:

Shape;
Length;
Thickness;
Density;
Tilt;
Vertical distance;
Color;
Hair quality;
Hair growth partner (the eyebrows hair grows in different directions depending on where it's located on the eyebrow)



What people do in reality is rate people based on attractiveness, which is both objective (because of beauty that is an objective matter) and subjective, and that is almost pointless since some people will think you're attractive and others don't and that's why you get people rating someone here a 4/8 and others rating the same person 5/8. 1 point of difference for the same face?? That means only one of two things:

1- One thinks the person is unattractive and it's downgrading the rate, or the other things the person is unattractive and it's upgrading the rate. (or both at the same time) (In both cases we're dealing not with beauty, but attractiveness)

2- They can't come to an agreement to how much each feature detracts on the rating



I got a good example of this on this thread I made, almost 1/4 of people voted the original Taylor Hill as more BEAUTIFUL despite the morphed one being a version of her with a bunch of her flaws minimized:

https://looksmax.org/threads/which-one-is-more-beautiful-poll.61123/

I agree but i think, i rate totally in objective, i will enter in the thread and vote, i will say what i see in the difference between the two images.