A
ascendmaxxing.
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2026
- Posts
- 51
- Reputation
- 23
Which variant is more effective for site-specific muscle hyperplasia?
ZyzzReincarnate
newcel
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Posts
- 10,373
- Reputation
- 19,031
its not really like one is more effective than the other in a blanket statement sort of way. igf-1 lr3 still has a localized effect, but not as pronounced as DES, but LR3 has a longer half life, meaning you would reap longer sustained igf-1 benefits than with DES.
id say overall igf-1 lr3 is the better choice, unless you're okay with pinning DES over and over. You could also potentially run both? but I haven't done enough research on that to know whether that is good to do or not.
DES seems like for more niche, high-level bodybuilding cases with doctor/coach tailored stacks and protocols.
id say overall igf-1 lr3 is the better choice, unless you're okay with pinning DES over and over. You could also potentially run both? but I haven't done enough research on that to know whether that is good to do or not.
DES seems like for more niche, high-level bodybuilding cases with doctor/coach tailored stacks and protocols.
Similar threads
brayden2000
