Im gay

[sadakiyo]

 

[Aesthetic]

water = fucking wet

 

[NiBBaCel]

@knajjd

 

[Einon]

Meme is deader than Nibba

 

[Antinous]

No one thinks I'm Gay on this site and they have never done threads to talk about it, so that doesn't confirm anything, and the same applies to you: Surely you're not gay, how do you know someone is gay? And there's nothing wrong with being gay, emancipating ones, against what's toxic, make sure of it! To deconstruct masculinity and any form of procreation of the symbolic archetype of what is rude and disgusting, yes! We love all happiness and loving expressions, but they must be cute: If not cute and angelic, then it's punishable! So whatever

 

[fobos]

Meme is deader than Nibba

What happened to nibba after doxxing

 

[Pietrosiek]

I DO NOT CARE I WANT MY ADRIANAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[Andromeda88]

No one thinks I'm Gay on this site and they have never done threads to talk about it, so that doesn't confirm anything, and the same applies to you: Surely you're not gay, how do you know someone is gay? And there's nothing wrong with being gay, emancipating ones, against what's toxic, make sure of it! To deconstruct masculinity and any form of procreation of the symbolic archetype of what is rude and disgusting, yes! We love all happiness and loving expressions, but they must be cute: If not cute and angelic, then it's punishable! So whatever

You're entire wall of text is incorrect, the definition of an homosexual is "an individual which likes the same gender" and can be shown in both the genders. So your argument about masculinity is incorrect since women can also be homosexual. This is common sense which everybody knows. You typing a lot doesn't make your points valid by the way. You can type a megathread and if your information is completely fucked up it doesn't matter, you won't get anybody telling you are high IQ.

 

[UnderCovrN0rmie]

 

[Antinous]

You're entire wall of text is incorrect, the definition of an homosexual is "an individual which likes the same gender" and can be shown in both the genders. So your argument about masculinity is incorrect since women can also be homosexual. This is common sense which everybody knows. You typing a lot doesn't make your points valid by the way. You can type a megathread and if your information is completely fucked up it doesn't matter, you won't get anybody telling you are high IQ.

at no time did I distort the concept of "homosexuality" and said that was not "an individual who likes the same gender", but you are making a joke by saying those garbage words with shit prose, no homo ; sorry, honey, BRAVADO won't work against Antinous, and dumb stupidity is merely a plague that will corrupt your own destiny: I don't want you to think I'm high iq, I told about that in a old post (just search, or is painful?) and Antinous won't repeat because you like him so much: Yeah envy in the way he writes, is that, sweetie? So fly away! Without hate, I love all beings on the face of all distorted and ominously cruel earth! For I am the supreme New Order that will overwhelm the blinding and excessive light, so whatever

 

[Andromeda88]

I said that at no time did I distort the concept of "homosexuality" and said that was not "an individual who likes the same gender", but you are making a joke by saying those garbage words with shit prose, no homo ; sorry, honey, BRAVADO won't work against Antinous, and dumb stupidity is merely a plague that will corrupt your own destiny: I don't want you to think I'm high iq, I told you about that and Antinous won't repeat because you like him so much: Yeah envy in the way he writes, is that, sweetie? So fly away! Without hate, I love all beings on the face of all distorted and ominously cruel earth! For I am the supreme New Order that will overwhelm the blinding and excessive light, so whatever

You just proved my point by demanding attention via acting as a conspiracy theorist and a mudahajid soldier. You contradict yourself constantly and your point is objectively incorrect which I criticised for misinformation. You wrote; " I said that at no time did I distort the concept of "homosexuality" which is exactly what you did. Another point which you prove yourself which is in the context of contradiction.
You claim homosexuality doesn't exist indirectly via using the " " when you typed homosexuality. You keep proving my points yourself and contradicting yourself, for instance you we're trying to insert a third person perspective which is ignorant since that doesn't hold any weight in your argument. You're wall of texts are just like fast food; high in empty calories and in this case the calories are text. You're pandering to those who are reading this at the moment which is why you are attempting to reclassify and adress your arguments.

 

[Einon]

What happened to nibba after doxxing

idk,tbh

 

[fobos]

idk,tbh

i see

 

[Deleted member 1560]

i see

What do you see

 

[Peachy]

What happened to nibba after doxxing

That nibba dead

 

[fobos]

What do you see

joe mama

 

[Deleted member 1560]

joe mama

What about Joe papa?

 

[fobos]

What about Joe papa?

no

 

[Deleted member 1560]

no

Yes

 

[reptiles]

@knajjd

Bans me

 

[Einon]

joe mama

ebin

 

[Antinous]

You just proved my point by demanding attention via acting as a conspiracy theorist and a mudahajid soldier. You contradict yourself constantly and your point is objectively incorrect which I criticised for misinformation. You wrote; " I said that at no time did I distort the concept of "homosexuality" which is exactly what you did. Another point which you prove yourself which is in the context of contradiction.
You claim homosexuality doesn't exist indirectly via using the " " when you typed homosexuality. You keep proving my points yourself and contradicting yourself, for instance you we're trying to insert a third person perspective which is ignorant since that doesn't hold any weight in your argument. You're wall of texts are just like fast food; high in empty calories and in this case the calories are text. You're pandering to those who are reading this at the moment which is why you are attempting to reclassify and adress your arguments.

"Homosexuality", using [""] is a sin to you, are you a masturbatory Christian? you don't know why Antinous used [""] and based all your supposed criticism on that being that Antinous didn't even mention anything about what you said, it proves how pornographic and unhappy you are; It is not conspiracy theory, I said I am the new order, you contradicted and tried to be clever by supposedly "refuting" me with the content of Antinous, although you did not even present plausible arguments, a true deadly joke; so keep ranting, ranting with BRAVADO against the person of Antinous, Antinous doesn't mind arguing in an obscure forum in the vastness of the Internet, so whatever