im tired of acting. i am very racist . and many people are racist as fuck in private

[kate most]

we absolutely despise indians ,they are dirty retards. my friend is doing renovation work in apartments and he says that curries are like from stone age

they dont know what is washing machine, cant use gas, break fucking toilets and dirty uncultured monkeys

he calls them churkas . he is the most normal man , with the most compliant beliefs to fit in society

people are waking up

@Gargantuan @St.TikTokcel

 

[St.TikTokcel]

we absolutely despise indians ,they are dirty retards. my friend is doing renovation work in apartments and he says that curries are like from stone age

they dont know what is washing machine, cant use gas, break fucking toilets and dirty uncultured monkeys

he calls them churkas . he is the most normal man , with the most compliant beliefs to fit in society

people are waking up

@Gargantuan @St.TikTokcel

 

[noodlelover]

You need to learn to appreciate Indian culture and people more.

No race is "better" than any other race. If that was true, then the better race would have subjugated enslaved or exterminated the inferior race. But since no existing races are exterminated or enslaved, we are all equal.

 

[dipenhydramine]

calm down sigma

 

[rory4579]

This is probably coming from some yellow ass balkan nigger

Shut up

 

[kate most]

This is probably coming from some yellow ass balkan nigger

Shut up

of course christian hates nationalism

go worship dead kike , faggot

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

 

[rory4579]

of course christian hates nationalism

go worship dead kike , faggot

Nigga how does racism correlate with nationalism

I mean yeah there are gonna be some niggers who take advantage of the eu's benefits

While others actually come to contribute something
Have a good night

go worship dead kike , faggot

May the lord forgive u homie

 

[kate most]

Nigga how does racism correlate with nationalism

I mean yeah there are gonna be some niggers who take advantage of the eu's benefits

While others actually come to contribute something
Have a good night


May the lord forgive u homie

fuck jewish christ

 

[rory4579]

fuck jewish christ

Your speaking in an acoustic room lil bro

 

[rory4579]

fuck jewish christ

Yidde yadda tecak is dead homie Womp womp

Smoking that tecak pack rn


Tecak is a fucking bald racist ass bitfch faggot

AhAHAHaha hed dead

Nothing u can do faggot

 

[johnathansmithston]

we absolutely despise indians ,they are dirty retards. my friend is doing renovation work in apartments and he says that curries are like from stone age

they dont know what is washing machine, cant use gas, break fucking toilets and dirty uncultured monkeys

he calls them churkas . he is the most normal man , with the most compliant beliefs to fit in society

people are waking up

@Gargantuan @St.TikTokcel

Does your friend not know what churka means

 

[kate most]

Yidde yadda tecak is dead homie Womp womp

Smoking that tecak pack rn


Tecak is a fucking bald racist ass bitfch faggot

AhAHAHaha hed dead

Nothing u can do faggot

wow i struck a nerve

your dead ancient jewish faggot is not more alive than tecak

at least teask lived his live to the fullest

 

[kate most]

Does your friend not know what churka means

yeah he called indians churkas while they are usually muslims

because they are brown

 

[johnathansmithston]

yeah he called indians churkas while they are usually muslims

because they are brown

Churka is Caucasian wtf

 

[rory4579]

wow i struck a nerve

your dead ancient jewish faggot is not more alive than tecak

at least teask lived his live to the fullest

Dnrd Acoustic room

Only thing i liked about that nigga is that he killed pedos

Rest was unnecessary

 

[sexy]

we absolutely despise indians ,they are dirty retards. my friend is doing renovation work in apartments and he says that curries are like from stone age

they dont know what is washing machine, cant use gas, break fucking toilets and dirty uncultured monkeys

he calls them churkas . he is the most normal man , with the most compliant beliefs to fit in society

people are waking up

@Gargantuan @St.TikTokcel

Preach, brother!

 

[Poopless One]

Im black and I hate niggers

 

[kate most]

Churka is Caucasian wtf

kavkazec da i shto?
tadzhik tozhe
turok tozhe churka

nahuj ti mozgi ebjow?

 

[MaghrebGator]

 

[johnathansmithston]

kavkazec da i shto?
tadzhik tozhe
turok tozhe churka

nahuj ti mozgi ebjow?

So what is it a blanket term for all of Asia now??

 

[kate most]

So what is it a blanket term for all of Asia now??

aziati eto guki

tajiks are churkas

obviously

kazakhs are gooks

 

[johnathansmithston]

aziati eto guki

tajiks are churkas

obviously

kazakhs are gooks

Whateverrr :/

 

[WanderingBurro]

You need to learn to appreciate Indian culture and people more.

No race is "better" than any other race. If that was true, then the better race would have subjugated enslaved or exterminated the inferior race. But since no existing races are exterminated or enslaved, we are all equal.

Most of Europe made the rest of the world its bitch until they realised it wasn't worth keeping colonies + complaints about "muh racism", they're more than capable of enslaving you if they really wanted to.

Nigga how does racism correlate with nationalism

I mean yeah there are gonna be some niggers who take advantage of the eu's benefits

While others actually come to contribute something
Have a good night


May the lord forgive u homie

A nation is race.

 

[noodlelover]

Most of Europe made the rest of the world its bitch until they realised it wasn't worth keeping colonies + complaints about "muh racism", they're more than capable of enslaving you if they really wanted to.

But complaining about racism and guilting white women is a survival skill.

And white women handicapping their own race with wokism is a weakness.

The white race isn't dominating because of these biological handicaps. White women were always going to prevent the white race from dominating long term.

Arab women on the other hand are happy to support their men dying in attempt to slaughter other races. But Arab's have other weaknesses.

You don't see Japanese, Chinese, Indian, Arab women destroying their societies from the inside out, to the degree that white women do.

 

[Coolerek]

Most of Europe made the rest of the world its bitch until they realised it wasn't worth keeping colonies + complaints about "muh racism", they're more than capable of enslaving you if they really wanted to.


A nation is race.

Lwk cope notice how when every other nation actually got the resources to do the things whites/europeans did they did it. It wasn't a Iq or race or whatever you'd like to say problem but a resources problem also Jfl on this part dont Asians have Higher Iq's than yall

 

[WanderingBurro]

Lwk cope notice how when every other nation actually got the resources to do the things whites/europeans did they did it. It wasn't a Iq or race or whatever you'd like to say problem but a resources problem also Jfl on this part dont Asians have Higher Iq's than yall

Giga delusional cope. Immigrants in western nations are given the same opportunities to succeed, sometimes even more so through things like free housing and free handouts from the state. If language is an issue then usually that's solved through the second generation which are usually fluent in the host country's language. But even with all of this in mind immigrant populations no matter how many generations they've resided in a host country will always be poorer and less productive than the native (White) population.

The West single handedly introduced the rest of the world to industrialisation but only countries with similar scoring IQ's were able to properly modernise, e.g. places like Japan and South Korea. The rest of the third world has had their chance and can't seem to keep up or adapt.

Wrong on every level, race is the problem.

 

[Coolerek]

Giga delusional cope. Immigrants in western nations are given the same opportunities to succeed, sometimes even more so through things like free housing and free handouts from the state. If language is an issue then usually that's solved through the second generation which are usually fluent in the host country's language. But even with all of this in mind immigrant populations no matter how many generations they've resided in a host country will always be poorer and less productive than the native (White) population.

The West single handedly introduced the rest of the world to industrialisation but only countries with similar scoring IQ's were able to properly modernise, e.g. places like Japan and South Korea. The rest of the third world has had their chance and can't seem to keep up or adapt.

Wrong on every level, race is the problem.

Not to use anecdotal evidence but there are plenty of Black, Hispanic, and Indian billionaires and successful people in the U.S and other European countries so it seems like when you get ethnics to have resources it means they perform just as well if not better than their white counterparts Youre wrong on every level it is an economic issue, not race or genetic by the way the reason this doesn't work in lots of African and southeast Asian countries is a lack of resources like it's tough to be rich in the middle of a desert also in parts of Africa where there is wealth the people live quite similar lives to us Just look at Dollar street (the website) (Jfl again on this part but I'm ethnic and if we're all retards I don't think me arguing with you intellectually would be possible)

 

[WanderingBurro]

Not to use anecdotal evidence but there are plenty of Black, Hispanic, and Indian billionaires and successful people in the U.S and other European countries so it seems like when you get ethnics to have resources it means they perform just as well if not better than their white counterparts Youre wrong on every level it is an economic issue, not race or genetic by the way the reason this doesn't work in lots of African and southeast Asian countries is a lack of resources like it's tough to be rich in the middle of a desert also in parts of Africa where there is wealth the people live quite similar lives to us Just look at Dollar street (the website) (Jfl again on this part but I'm ethnic and if we're all retards I don't think me arguing with you intellectually would be possible)

Have you ever come across the bell curve? Ethnics that are smart and successful aren't impossible, they're just far less likely to occur than their white counterparts. If you need an easy way to visualise this then you can use height for an example. If you look hard enough you can find some tall Indians that might not at all be short compared to your average white but when you take Indians as a whole they are very much shorter than your average European country. Everything exists as an average. Being able to list a handful of successful ethnics does not disprove this average because ethnics as a whole vastly underpreform compared to their white counterparts in uncontrolled settings.

One common counterpoint to this is the fact that there are plenty of ethnic groups in the US that outpreform whites but these groups are very much the result of controlled settings. They're usually the result of rigorous vetting where only the best of the best will make it through. Whenever you take an uncontrolled group of immigrants that aren't vetted like say Latin Americans entering the US through the southern border they preform far worse than their White counterparts, making smaller salaries and usually being more reliant on handouts. The same can be said for the UK's Indian and Paki population, the Indian population is rather wealthy and successful in Britain but they're cherry picked, it's the Pakis that enter the UK illegally and are usually a better representation of your average Paki from Pakistan, they usually again, vastly underpreform compared to their White counterparts.

"Tough to be rich in the middle of a desert", South Africa and Australia were basically built from the ground up in desolate noman's land by Whites. Nice try...

Africa and South East Asia are some of the most resource rich countries in the world! This is complete nonsense! We import countless things needed for our daily lives from these regions of the world, if they wanted to modernize a lack of resources is far from their problem. The problem is that regions like Africa are prone to dysfunctional dictatorships and corruption (you can say corruption exists everywhere but you'd be foolish to ignore how much worse of an issue it is in Africa, especially Subsaharan Africa).

Not to mention the west has been pouring resources and aid into these places for ages now. The west provides them all sorts of aid and money yet they don't do anything meaningful with it.

Again, YOU'RE wrong on every level. Nothing you have said adds up or disproves anything I've said here.

 

[Coolerek]

The claim that immigrant populations or non-Western nations lag behind due to race oversimplifies a complex issue. While immigrants in Western countries may receive some social support, they often face challenges like discrimination, language barriers, and unequal access to education, which can affect their socioeconomic outcomes. It's also important to note that not all immigrant groups struggle—many, particularly those from East and South Asia, outperform native populations in education and income. Race is not the determining factor; rather, socioeconomic conditions, cultural values, and opportunities play a much larger role.

The success of countries like Japan and South Korea isn't due to inherent racial superiority but is the result of historical, geopolitical, and cultural factors, along with significant Western support. Modern scientific consensus also rejects the idea that race determines intelligence, with IQ disparities largely explained by environmental factors like education, nutrition, and healthcare. The Flynn Effect further demonstrates that IQ can rise across all populations over time, challenging the notion that race is the root cause of economic or intellectual differences. (also jfl this was so easy to research)

 

[Coolerek]

The argument that racial differences explain disparities in intelligence and socioeconomic outcomes, as suggested by The Bell Curve, is both scientifically flawed and overly simplistic. Modern genetic research has shown that there is more genetic diversity within racial groups than between them, meaning that race is not a biologically meaningful category when it comes to traits like intelligence. Intelligence is a complex and multifaceted trait, influenced by a wide range of environmental factors including education, nutrition, healthcare, and socioeconomic background. The differences in IQ scores between racial groups often cited by proponents of The Bell Curve can largely be explained by these environmental factors. For instance, disparities in access to quality education, early childhood nutrition, and exposure to enriched learning environments are significant predictors of cognitive development and IQ scores. These are not reflective of inherent racial differences but rather of unequal opportunities and systemic barriers faced by different groups.

Your analogy comparing average height differences between Indians and Europeans fails to capture the complexity of intelligence. Height is a more straightforward genetic trait, influenced by nutrition but not by the kinds of multifaceted environmental inputs that shape intelligence over a lifetime. Intelligence is not a fixed trait like height, but rather one that can change and develop over time through education, social interaction, and enriched environments. This is supported by the Flynn Effect, which shows that average IQ scores have risen dramatically in many parts of the world over the past century as living conditions, education, and access to resources have improved. If intelligence were primarily determined by race, we would not expect to see such rapid increases across different populations. This further debunks the notion that intelligence is static and racially determined, showing instead that it is highly responsive to environmental factors.

Regarding immigrant performance, it is true that selective immigration policies can lead to certain immigrant groups outperforming others, but this does not support a racial explanation for success or failure. Selective immigration policies often prioritize individuals with high levels of education and skills, which explains the success of groups like Indian and Chinese immigrants in the U.S. and U.K. However, research shows that even less "vetted" groups, like Latin American immigrants, improve their socioeconomic standing over generations. While first-generation immigrants may start with lower incomes and educational levels, their children and grandchildren tend to make significant gains in education and income, closing the gap with native-born populations. This demonstrates that given access to opportunities, immigrant groups can succeed over time, regardless of their initial starting point. Additionally, the challenges faced by regions like Africa or Southeast Asia are far more complex than just corruption or resource mismanagement. These areas were deeply impacted by colonialism, which left behind political instability and underdeveloped infrastructure. Western aid alone cannot "fix" these regions without addressing deeper systemic issues, such as governance, education, and economic inequality, none of which are tied to race. (also for more jfl ur just wrong and the one coping lmaoo)

 

[isis_Bleach]

the better race would have subjugated enslaved or exterminated the inferior race.

yea i cant think of a single time thats happened

 

[noodlelover]

yea i cant think of a single time thats happened
View attachment 3249789

White people have devolved since then. I say this as a white person.

We're not capable of the same level collective dominance because of hormones, culture, biology.

 

[blackrockjewmanlet]

Bro i live here it was in news everywhere like something great, JFL at rhis retards for shaming country with some foid cuck ass song

 

[isis_Bleach]

White people have devolved since then. I say this as a white person.

We're not capable of the same level collective dominance because of hormones, culture, biology.

do u think its cuz we got jewed with chemicals and xenoestrogen etc? if so we should let curries and africans have a fuck ton of xenoesteogen and chemicals so they get mutated and shit even worse then us

 

[noodlelover]

do u think its cuz we got jewed with chemicals and xenoestrogen etc?

I don't know, I'm sure all the skin care products that block T are part of it, as well as sunscreens, shampoo, conditioner, birth control, shit diet, processed food, lack of sunlight, poor sleep habits, etc.

We created technology and then technology handicapped us.

if so we should let curries and africans have a fuck ton of xenoesteogen and chemicals so they get mutated and shit even worse then us

I don't actually think in terms of racial identity. I couldn't give a fuck what happens to the "white race" as long as I get laid, and ideally wind up with a hot girlfriend that cares about me.

I'm an American and want fully open borders, citizenship for all.

 

[isis_Bleach]

I don't know, I'm sure all the skin care products that block T are part of it, as well as sunscreens, shampoo, conditioner, birth control, shit diet, processed food, lack of sunlight, poor sleep habits, etc.

We created technology and then technology handicapped us.

I don't actually think in terms of racial identity. I couldn't give a fuck what happens to the "white race" as long as I get laid, and ideally wind up with a hot girlfriend that cares about me.

I'm an American and want fully open borders, citizenship for all.

same. it means more ugly ethnics so jbw is an even bigger halo. but theres gotta be some place where its only white for my white grandma to stay, cuz in the hood shell get mugged. oregon, maine, washington etc shpuld be whiteo nly

 

[noodlelover]

same. it means more ugly ethnics so jbw is an even bigger halo. but theres gotta be some place where its only white for my white grandma to stay, cuz in the hood shell get mugged. oregon, maine, washington etc shpuld be whiteo nly

Exactly. I'm planning on moving to a poorer, less safe country, to try to find a loving girlfriend.

But if the U.S. could become that country, it would save me travel, moving, and visa time and money.

But yah, there is and always will be plenty of safe neighborhoods in the U.S.

Even in Africa, there are safe places with security, and walls, etc. As long as you have money, you're good. And at least for the next couple decades, even if you don't they'll be moderately safe places.

 

[WanderingBurro]

The claim that immigrant populations or non-Western nations lag behind due to race oversimplifies a complex issue.

No race quite the consistent factor.

While immigrants in Western countries may receive some social support, they often face challenges like discrimination, language barriers, and unequal access to education, which can affect their socioeconomic outcomes.

Second and third generation immigrants are usually fluent in the host country's language, the language barrier is only really a problem for one generation before it stops becoming an excuse for poor performance. A ton of wealth has been wasted on trying to close the gap in education by pouring time and resources into "underpriviliged" black schools and this usually does little to nothing to bring up black performance. Schools are no longer segregated either so this excuse doesn't really hold up.

It's also important to note that not all immigrant groups struggle—many, particularly those from East and South Asia, outperform native populations in education and income.

East Asia already has a relatively high average IQ and usually the South Asian immigrants into the US are the best South Asia has to offer. It takes quite a lot to complete the journey with only a handful of South Asians being able to make it, these South Asians are not at all a good representation of South Asia as a whole. There are a reason these groups preform better than their White counterparts and it's because they are either 1.) already possess higher average IQ or 2.) are filtered through for hard/smart workers.

Race is not the determining factor; rather, socioeconomic conditions, cultural values, and opportunities play a much larger role.

No.

The success of countries like Japan and South Korea isn't due to inherent racial superiority but is the result of historical, geopolitical, and cultural factors, along with significant Western support.

Japan and South Korea have IQ averages that are mostly on par with Western Nations. Explain why East Asian countries vastly outpreform their South East Asian neighbours. (which may I remind you have a much lower average IQ than East Asians)

Modern scientific consensus also rejects the idea that race determines intelligence, with IQ disparities largely explained by environmental factors like education, nutrition, and healthcare. The Flynn Effect further demonstrates that IQ can rise across all populations over time, challenging the notion that race is the root cause of economic or intellectual differences. (also jfl this was so easy to research)

Wrong, IQ will only have the potential of rising if the environment calls for it. People don't evolve traits in a vacuum. They evolve to adapt to new environments. If a tribe in Africa is well off with hunting and gathering alone they will never develop the know how or need for longer term thinking.

The argument that racial differences explain disparities in intelligence and socioeconomic outcomes, as suggested by The Bell Curve, is both scientifically flawed and overly simplistic. Modern genetic research has shown that there is more genetic diversity within racial groups than between them, meaning that race is not a biologically meaningful category when it comes to traits like intelligence.

This makes zero sense and you would realise it made zero sense if you listened to what you were saying. There is no reason why two individuals from the same racial group would be more genetically diverse than two individuals from two different racial groups. If this were true then the whole notion of "mixing is healthy to promote genetic diversity" would be a complete sham because if you're going by the logic of you need to increase genetic diversity for a healthy population then why would you mate with someone who shares far less genetic diversity from a separate racial group when you can get "larger racial diversity" within the same race? It makes no sense and is merely framed in a way to make fools like you believe in racially blind pseudo-science.

Intelligence is a complex and multifaceted trait, influenced by a wide range of environmental factors including education, nutrition, healthcare, and socioeconomic background.

IQ is for the most part genetic, you can just look up twin studies to show how little environment actually plays a role on the outcome of IQ.

The differences in IQ scores between racial groups often cited by proponents of The Bell Curve can largely be explained by these environmental factors. For instance, disparities in access to quality education, early childhood nutrition, and exposure to enriched learning environments are significant predictors of cognitive development and IQ scores. These are not reflective of inherent racial differences but rather of unequal opportunities and systemic barriers faced by different groups.

Again look up twin studies, they completely disprove this idea.

Your analogy comparing average height differences between Indians and Europeans fails to capture the complexity of intelligence. Height is a more straightforward genetic trait, influenced by nutrition but not by the kinds of multifaceted environmental inputs that shape intelligence over a lifetime. Intelligence is not a fixed trait like height, but rather one that can change and develop over time through education, social interaction, and enriched environments.

Height is more straightforward because we can observe it with our own eyes, you can't mumbo jumbo your way to convince someone that someone of say 180cm is shorter than 170cm. IQ is a little harder to gauge at a glance but can be through testing. And thorough testing shows that IQ cannot be increased. There is nothing you can really do to increase IQ. Twins born in different environments and with different opportunities will largely share the same IQ. Just because you can't see IQ, doesn't mean it's not genetically fixed.

This is supported by the Flynn Effect, which shows that average IQ scores have risen dramatically in many parts of the world over the past century as living conditions, education, and access to resources have improved. If intelligence were primarily determined by race, we would not expect to see such rapid increases across different populations. This further debunks the notion that intelligence is static and racially determined, showing instead that it is highly responsive to environmental factors.

Whilst you can't increase IQ, you can certainly lower it through things like poor nutrition which may have lead to a slight increase in some populations but despite this most of the third world still falls back a good 10-30 IQ points behind western nations and there's only so much nutrition can play a role in this disparity.

Regarding immigrant performance, it is true that selective immigration policies can lead to certain immigrant groups outperforming others, but this does not support a racial explanation for success or failure. Selective immigration policies often prioritize individuals with high levels of education and skills, which explains the success of groups like Indian and Chinese immigrants in the U.S. and U.K. However, research shows that even less "vetted" groups, like Latin American immigrants, improve their socioeconomic standing over generations. While first-generation immigrants may start with lower incomes and educational levels, their children and grandchildren tend to make significant gains in education and income, closing the gap with native-born populations. This demonstrates that given access to opportunities, immigrant groups can succeed over time, regardless of their initial starting point.

Then explain why the gap has never been closed for say the black population. I can imagine the gap closing for East Asians due to their IQ's not lagging too far behind most westerners', their children might preform better due to less of a language barrier and not having to make the arduous journey of immigration. But why doesn't this apply to all other groups. Why do blacks still struggle to integrate into the US, why do second or third generation Arabs or Pakis fail to integrate into western Europe.

Additionally, the challenges faced by regions like Africa or Southeast Asia are far more complex than just corruption or resource mismanagement. These areas were deeply impacted by colonialism, which left behind political instability and underdeveloped infrastructure. Western aid alone cannot "fix" these regions without addressing deeper systemic issues, such as governance, education, and economic inequality, none of which are tied to race. (also for more jfl ur just wrong and the one coping lmaoo)

Most of Europe was ravaged by the World Wars but built themselves back up. Many European people have been subjugated to rule by other European nations but this does not stop them from becoming successful once independent. Is the US struggling from being a former British colony? Is Hong Kong struggling from being a former British Colony? The Irish were heavily suppressed by the English but Ireland now exists as a first world country. Why is it only ethnic countries that fail to become first world after being freed from foreign rule?


(No again, you haven't disproved anything, you also forgot to tag me in your reply you stupid nigger)